Effects of Bone Grafting and Non-Bone Grafting on Implant Stability and New Bone Formation in Patients Undergoing Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation Combined with Bicon Short Implants
Shuangxi Liu,Shaoshan Chen,Zhuogeng Chen,Xue He,Xieshan Huang
Abstract:Objective: To compare the effects of bone grafting versus non-bone grafting on implant stability and new bone formation in patients undergoing maxillary sinus floor lift combined with placement of a Bicon short dental implant. Methods: We recruited 60 patients with posterior maxillary tooth loss and insufficient jaw bone mass from December 2017 to December 2019, and the patients were divided into 2 groups in accordance with the surgical method: the bone grafted group (n = 32) and the non-bone grafted group (n = 28). Both groups underwent maxillary sinus floor elevation combined with Bicon short dental implant placement. No bone-grafting materials were used in the non-bone grafted group, and autologous bone chips mixed with Bicon bone substitute were used for bone grafting in the bone grafted group. The 2 groups were compared for their peri-implant index and periodontal bleeding index immediately after the operation, as well as at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The study also compared the sub-sinus-membrane height, peri-implant bone density, implant stability quotient, and alveolar bone height in the implant area at 3, 6, and 12 months after the operation, as well as the implant survival rate and complications (infection, bleeding, mucosal perforation, sinus-floor cyst, and bone-graft displacement) 12 months after the operation. Results: The peri-implant index and periodontal bleeding index immediately after the operation in the bone grafted group were higher than those in the non-bone grafted group (all P < .05), but there were no significant differences in the 2 indices between the 2 groups at 3, 6, and 12 months after the operation (all P > .05). The sub-sinus-membrane height, peri-implant bone density, implant stability quotient, and alveolar bone height in the bone grafted area were higher in the bone grafted group than in the non-bone grafted group at 3, 6, and 12 months after the operation (all P < .05). Although the implant survival rate in the bone grafted group was slightly higher than that in the non-bone grafted group at 12 months after the operation, the difference was not statistically significant (P > .05). One case of mucosal perforation occurred in the bone grafted group, but there was no significant difference in the complication rate between the 2 groups (P > .05). Conclusion: The findings of this study support the use of autologous bone chips mixed with Bicon bone substitute in maxillary sinus floor elevation combined with Bicon short dental implant placement for improved implant stability and new bone formation. Further research is needed to evaluate long-term outcomes and potential complications associated with this technique.