[Clinical significance of complement analysis in collagen diseases].

H. Kameda

2003-10-10

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Comparative Evaluation of Endo-sinus Bone Augmentation after Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation Without Grafting Using Two Radiographic Methods.

Liting Gai,Xin Luo,Ye Guan,Fuming He

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.8365

2021-01-01

The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants

Abstract:PURPOSE Using panoramic radiograph and CBCT to compare the measurement errors of the residual bone height in the same site before implant placement in the posterior maxilla and endo-sinus bone gain after osteotome sinus floor elevation without grafting, and to evaluate endo-sinus bone augmentation before stage-two surgery with CBCT. Also, some related factors of new bone formation in the sinus were analyzed, such as small bone block elevated by osteotome at the implant apex intraoperatively. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients were enrolled in the retrospective study; dental implants were placed in the maxillary posterior region using osteotome sinus floor elevation without grafting. The panoramic radiograph and CBCT were taken preoperatively, immediate postoperatively, and before the stage-two surgery. Endo-sinus bone augmentation was evaluated. A generalized linear model was made to explore the related factors of endo-sinus bone gain. Also, some clinical indexes, such as sinus membrane perforation rate, implant success, and failure criteria were assessed. RESULTS One hundred two dental implants were inserted in 91 patients. Preoperatively, the mean residual bone height was 8.53 ± 1.76 mm and 7.87 ± 1.45 mm measured using a panoramic radiograph and CBCT, respectively, with significant statistical differences (P < .05). Endo-sinus bone gains of 1.31 °æ 1.05 mm by panoramic radiograph and 1.80 ± 1.72 mm by CBCT were observed, with statistically significant differences (P < .05). The final endosinus bone gain was positively correlated with the implant protrusion length at baseline without any other relevant factors, such as elevated small bone block. CONCLUSION Measurement errors could be relatively minimized when using CBCT. Using the osteotome sinus floor elevation technique without grafting, approximately 2 mm of endo-sinus bone could be acquired. The final endo-sinus bone gain was positively correlated with implant protrusion length at baseline. Small bone block elevated intraoperatively did not gain more endo-sinus bone.
Evaluation of New Bone Formation after Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation and Simultaneous Implant Placement Without Grafting by Two Radiographic Methods

Liting Gai,Jianhu Liu,Yi Feng,Xiaoting Shen,Guofen Lin,Fuming He

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.338_13509

2019-01-01

Clinical Oral Implants Research

Abstract:Background After tooth loss, alveolar bone atrophy and pneumatization of the maxillary sinus occur. It is difficult for implant placement to posterior maxilla because of the reduced residual bone height (RBH) available. Osteotome sinus floor elevation (OSFE) is a reliable technique and produced satisfied results. Compared with oral panoramic radiograph (OPG), the application of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) that provides clinically valuable information is considered to be more accurate assessment. Aim/Hypothesis The purpose of this study was to compare radiographically the variances of measurements on OPG and CBCT, and to evaluate the effects of endo-sinus new bone formation after OSFE without grafting in a short time. Simultaneously, to analysis the potential related factors of endo-sinus bone gain (ESBG). Material and Methods A prospective study design was adopted. 87 implant placements were inserted in 80 patients. OPG and CBCT were used at preoperative, immediately in postoperative period and before stage II surgery (mean 5-month postoperative). The RBH was measured at preoperative and before stage II surgery, the implant protrusion length (IPL) was assessed at immediately postoperative and before stage II surgery, ESBG was reviewed before stage II surgery. Compare the RBH, IPL, ESBG between two groups from OPG and CBCT. Correlation analysis was conducted to explore the relationship between ESBG with IPL, RBH, age, gender and bone block lifted intraoperatively by osteotomes. Significance was set to 0.05. Results The mean RBH was 8.47 ± 1.78 mm on OPG and 8.08 ± 1.47 mm on CBCT preoperatively. After mean 5 months, it was found the averaged RBH was 9.58 ± 1.67 mm on OPG and 10.59 ± 1.51 mm on CBCT. The mean IPL was 2.44 ± 1.16 mm on OPG and 1.98 ± 1.09 mm on CBCT at immediately postoperative. The averaged IPL was 1.27 ± 1.30 mm on OPG and 0.05 ± 1.33 mm on CBCT before the stage II surgery, respectively. ESBG was 1.10 ± 0.76 mm on OPG and 1.90 ± 1.38 mm on CBCT. And there were all significant differences between two groups (P < 0.05). As shown by the numerical value, ESBG with bone block lifted were more than with no bone block lifted, but P value > 0.05 that indicating the difference was again not statistically significant difference between two groups. The relevant factors analysis detected that the final ESBG was positively correlated to IPL at immediately postoperative. Meanwhile, no other variables were detected showed to be associated with the final ESBG, including RBH, age, gender and bone block lifted. Conclusion and Clinical Implications In conclusion, compared with the OPG of 2D image, the errors of measurement could be reduced and the results could be assessed more accurately on CBCT. Approximate 2 mm endo-sinus bone augment could be acquired, and the final ESBG was explored to be positively correlated to IPL measured at immediately postoperative. Bone block lifted intraoperatively by osteotomes does not increase the amount of endo-sinus bone formation.
Changes in Bone Graft Height and Influencing Factors after Sinus Floor Augmentation by Using the Lateral Window Approach: A Clinical Retrospective Study of 1 to 2 Years.

Xiaoxu Guan,Jiawei Zhang,Yao Chen,Jie Han,Mengfei Yu,Yi Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.10.010

IF: 4.148

2021-01-01

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Abstract:STATEMENT OF PROBLEM:Recent systematic reviews have reported resorption of bone grafts after augmentation, but the influencing factors are numerous and uncertain. Different brands of bone graft and other factors may affect the bone formation effect after sinus floor augmentation.PURPOSE:The purpose of this retrospective clinical study was to evaluate the graft material height changes after sinus floor augmentation with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to investigate the potential influencing factors related to graft resorption.MATERIAL AND METHODS:Four midsagittal cut CBCT images of 157 posterior maxillary implants after maxillary sinus floor elevation by using the lateral window approach with bone grafts from 116 patients were obtained. Four CBCT scans had been performed immediately (T0), 6 months (T1) and 12 months after bone grafting (T2), and 1.5 to 2 years after treatment (T3), and the distance between the implant platform and the grafted mucosa of the maxillary sinus floor was measured at 3 locations. Correlation coefficients of these parameters were calculated. A linear mixed model was used to investigate potential factors influencing graft height reduction, including the patient's sex, age, smoking status, periodontal status, graft brand, implant site, implant level, placement time, and residual bone height.RESULTS:Mean ±standard deviation graft height at the mesial side of the implant (MeGH) was significantly decreased by 0.32 ±0.88 mm in the first 6 months, was gradually reduced after 6 months (0.26 ±0.43 mm), and then 1 to 2 years later increased to 0.39 ±0.97 mm. The changes in graft height at the center of the implant (CeGH) and graft height at the distal side (DiGH) groups were similar to those in the MeGH group. A significantly positive correlation was found among the height alterations in 3 locations (rs=0.954, P<.001). The linear mixed model showed that smoking was more likely to cause graft height reduction in MeGH (P=.034).CONCLUSIONS:Graft height significantly decreased after maxillary sinus augmentation over 1 to 2 years. Smoking had a negative effect on graft height changes, while the 2 brands of graft and other factors had no significant effect.
Repositioning of the Bone Window in Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation with Simultaneous Implant Placement: A Retrospective Radiographic Study.

Zhikang Wang,Jing Zhang,Lingfei Ren,Guoli Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13963

2022-01-01

Clinical Oral Implants Research

Abstract:Objectives To retrospectively evaluate whether repositioning the bone window leads to a better outcome of three-dimensional sinus augmentation in lateral sinus floor elevation (LSFE) with simultaneous implant placement. Methods 34 patients with a total of 40 implants (14: test group, 26: control group) receiving LSFE with simultaneous implant placement were included in this retrospective research. CBCT images were taken before surgery, immediately and 6 months after surgery. The two-dimensional augmentation parameters, including apical bone height (ABH), endo-sinus bone gain (ESBG), and palatal/buccal bone height (PBH/BBH), and three-dimensional parameters, including augmentation volume (AV) and palatal/buccal augmentation volume (PAV/BAV), were measured. The lateral defect length (LDL) and lateral window length (LWL) were also measured to evaluate the lateral antrostomy recovery. Results At the 6-month follow-up, the reduction rates at ABH, ESBG, and BBH of the test group (ABH: 10.41% +/- 30.30%, ESBG: 2.55% +/- 8.91%, BBH: 2.50% +/- 8.65%) were significantly lower than those of the control group (ABH: 25.10% +/- 22.02%, ESBG: 11.47% +/- 9.79%, BBH: 7.10% +/- 5.37%; p < .05). In addition, the test group showed better three-dimensional augmentation stability on the buccal side (BAV reduction: 15.51% +/- 10.86% vs. 27.15% +/- 12.61%; p < .05). Moreover, the LDL/LWL ratio of the test group was significantly lower than that of the control group (p < .05). Conclusion Within the limitations of this study, repositioning of the bone window in LSFE with simultaneous implant placement could contribute to endo-sinus augmentation stability on the buccal side at the 6-month follow-up. Moreover, it would also facilitate recovery of the lateral antrostomy defect.
The Relation Between Morphology of Maxillary Sinus after Augmentation in Three Classification Methods and Residual Bone Height: A Retrospective Study

Zhi Wang,Qi Jia,Heng Bo Jiang,Jianmin Han,Lidong Zou,Guangliang Niu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1850012

IF: 2.6

2022-01-01

International Journal of Clinical Practice

Abstract:Maxillary sinus augmentation is critical to oral implantology, particularly in some cases. The morphology of the sinus floor reflects the lifting effect to a certain extent; however, there has been limited research on the morphology after sinus augmentation. The present study aims to investigate the relationship between residual bone height (RBH) and the morphology of the sinus floor and determine whether a correlation exists between the different evaluation classifications. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation procedures were performed in 56 patients and 68 teeth using the sinus crest approach (SCA). Imaging results obtained after one year of sinus augmentation were analyzed and simultaneously classified along the coronal plane, the sagittal plane, and the biplane (coronal-sagittal). The higher the RBH, the closer the result tends to be to A, A’, or type 1 (more satisfactory). There was a significant correlation between the three different evaluation classifications (p<0.05). The morphology of perforation cases was involved in types C, D, C’, and D’. A more satisfactory post-lifting morphology (tent type and flat type) is probably related to an optimal preoperative bone height, and an unsatisfactory post-lifting morphology is related to a low preoperative sinus floor height. The sagittal plane evaluation correlates with the coronal plane and biplane evaluation and is thus more recommended.
Sinus Floor Elevation and Simultaneous Dental Implantation: A Long Term Retrospective Study of Sinus Bone Gain

Q Wang,D Li,Z H Tang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19723/j.issn.1671-167x.2019.05.022

2019-01-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the sinus bone gains after sinus floor elevation procedures with or without grafts when implants were placed simultaneously.METHODS:The research included 26 edentulous patients in the maxillary posterior region, who were divided into 2 different groups according to the sinus lift procedures employed: group of osteotome sinus floor elevation with bone grafts (group A) and group of osteotome sinus floor elevation without bone grafts (group B). The implants were placed simultaneously, and were followed for a period of 30-50 months after sinus floor elevation as routine and then were observed for sinus bone change.RESULTS:There were 27 implants (13 implants for group A and 14 implants for group B) and the following time was 40.23 (36.20, 48.07) months. The residual bone height (RBH) was (6.64±1.21) mm for group A and ( 6.96±1.36) mm for group B; the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P=0.459).The sinus bone gain (SBG) when followed was (2.20±1.71) mm for group A, and 1.77 (0.94, 2.05) mm for group B; the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.583). The quality of apical bone around implant apex was divided into 3 categories which were excellent, fine and fair.The quality of apical bone around implant apex was excellent and fine for 9 implants in group A and 8 implants in group B, and the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (Fisher exact test, P=0.695).The implant apex when followed was (0.09±1.32) mm below the new sinus floor for group A and (0.03±0.91) mm for group B, and the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.898). The SBG for the total was 1.85 (1.10, 2.20) mm. The SBG was statistically significantly only related to the protrusion height of the implant apex (r=0.383, P=0.049).CONCLUSION:Sinus floor elevation procedures with or without grafts can all gain good results. The SBG is related to the protrusion height of the implant apex significantly.
Endoscope-assisted Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation with a Mini-Lateral Window: A Retrospective Study

Guanchen Ye,Xiaowen Yu,Baixiang Wang,Yu Zhou,Mengfei Yu,Huiming Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13223

2023-01-01

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Abstract:OBJECTIVES:The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of endoscope-controlled sinus floor augmentation through a mini-lateral window, compared with traditional lateral window approach.MATERIALS AND METHODS:This retrospective research included 19 patients and 20 augmented sinuses using lateral window approach with simultaneous implant placement (test group: a 3-4 mm round osteotomy; control group: a 10 × 8 mm rectangular osteotomy). Preoperatively (T0), immediately after surgery (T1), and 6 months postoperatively (T2), cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were obtained. Residual bone height (RBH), lateral window dimension (LWD), endo-sinus bone gain (ESBG), apical bone height (ABH), and bone density were measured. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Patients' evaluation of pain first day after surgery and a week later was assessed by visual analog scale (VAS).RESULTS:No significant difference was found in ESBG, ABH between the two groups at T1, T2 or their changes from T1 to T2. However, the increase of bone density value in the test group was significantly higher than control group (356.28 ± 149.59 vs. 242.99 ± 129.54; p < 0.05). The sinus perforation rate of test and control group was 10% and 20%, respectively. The VAS score of the test group at the first day after surgery was significantly lower than control group (4.20 ± 1.03 vs. 5.60 ± 1.71; p < 0.05).CONCLUSIONS:Endoscope-controlled maxillary sinus floor augmentation through a mini-lateral window yield similar result with traditional approach in terms of bone height gain. The modified approach could facilitate new bone formation, reducing sinus perforation rate and postoperative pain.
Clinical and radiographic changes following transcrestal sinus augmentation: A scoping review of the last 25 years

Ann M. Decker,Sandra Stuhr,Tiziano Testori,Hom‐Lay Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13389

2024-10-02

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Abstract:Introduction Maxillary sinus floor elevation is a surgical procedure intended to increase the volume of the bone vertically to accommodate dental implant placement. This intervention is frequently required for implant installation in the posterior maxilla, where the bone may be insufficient for securing implants of necessary length and stability. Sinus floor elevation can be completed either through a direct approach with a "window" through the lateral wall of the alveolar ridge or an indirect "transcrestal/transalveolar" sinus floor elevation (TSFE), which accesses the sinus floor through the crest of the edentulous ridge. Our study aims to provide a comprehensive scoping review of research conducted over the past 25 years on TSFE, specifically. Methods A literature search aimed at identifying pertinent literature for the purpose of this PRISMA‐ScR‐compliant scoping review was conducted. Only randomized controlled trials, non‐randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, and case series that met the eligibility criteria were selected. Relevant data from these studies were extracted. Primary outcome measures included radiographic bone levels and implant failure >5 years. Secondary outcome measures included implant stability at time of placement and complications. Interventions reported in the selected studies were grouped based on treatment modality, which were then compared with the control therapy (traditional osteotome technique) after a minimum of 12 months healing period. Results Our search yielded 633 records, and after deduplication, 574 of these were screened. Application of the eligibility criteria led to the inclusion of 37 articles in the final selection. Case selection for included studies enrolling subjects: Four different transcrestal sinus elevation treatment modalities were identified: (a) osteotome, (b) piezoelectric surgery, (c) osseodensification, and (d) hydraulic techniques. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, no superior approach for TSFE could be identified. Overall, all techniques demonstrated high implant survival rates. Conclusion Comprehensive understanding of the patient's medical history, available armamentarium, and post‐operative complications/management strategies are all essential to the completion of a successful TSFE approach for implant placement in the posterior maxilla, regardless of the treatment modality used.

dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
[Clinical evaluation of josamycin for the treatment of Mycoplasma pneumonia in children].

T. Motohiro,K. Tanaka,T. Koga,Y. Shimada,N. Tomita,Y. Sakata,T. Fujimoto,T. Nishiyama,K. Ishimoto,K. Tominaga

1983-06-01

Abstract:Thirty-one strains of Mycoplasma pneumoniae were tested for drug sensitivity to both josamycin (JM) and erythromycin (EM), to evaluate the efficacy of JM for mycoplasmal pneumonia in children. In addition to the sensitivity tests of 31 M. pneumoniae strains against JM and EM, 50 patients, between the ages of 3 years 1 month and 13 years 3 months, suspected of suffering from mycoplasmal pneumonia were treated with 50 or 200 mg JM tablets at an average daily dose of 43.1 mg/kg t.i.d. or b.i.d. for an average period of 14 days; an additional 31 patients between the ages of 2 years 9 months and 11 years, suspected of suffering from this disease were treated with tablet or dry syrup of EM, with the exception of EM estolate, t.i.d. or b.i.d. at an average daily dose of 72.5 mg/kg for an average period of 15 days. Patients were selected in 37 and 22 mycoplasmal pneumonic patients respectively for JM and EM. Clinical and bacteriological effects, efficacy and side effects of the drugs on this disease were studied and the following results were obtained. Drug sensitivity test Of all 31 strains tested for JM sensitivity the populations which exhibited 0.125 mcg/ml were most abundant (18/31, 58.1%) and MIC pattern of all strains were distributed from 0.0313 to 0.125 mcg/ml. In the EM group, 61.3% (19/31) of the populations were sensitive at 0.015 mcg/ml, exhibiting the dominant distribution pattern and MIC range of all organism varied from 0.0078 to 0.0313 mcg/ml. Resistant strains were found to neither JM nor EM. EM was approximately 2 to 10 times more active than JM in MIC evaluation. Clinical effects of JM by daily doses Clinical effects relative to the daily dose were evaluated in 3, 7, 10 days after administration of drugs. The response was favorable, according to assessments of the attending doctors, in 96.7, 100% and 95.8% of the patient group given JM in a daily dose of 40-49 mg/kg, the group to which the largest number of patients belonged. Similar favorable results were obtained by the assessments of Evaluation Committee, showing 86.7, 96.7% and 100% of favorable response. Upon comparison, in the same interval, of these results with those of the groups given EM in a daily dose of 50 mg/kg, the group in which the largest number of patients were seen, there was no significant difference in the assessments either of the attending doctors or of the Evaluation Committee.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation with injectable xenogeneic bone substitute in gel form: A clinical, radiological and histological analysis

Michele A Lopez,Pier C Passarelli,Andrea Netti,Alessia Felicetti,Flavia Dell'Aquila,Piotr Wychowański,Antonio D'Addona

Abstract:Purpose: This retrospective study measured the increase in bone tissue using the transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation with injectable xenogeneic bone substitute in gel form with simultaneous implant placement. This procedure allows elevation of the sinus floor atraumatically, reducing the risk of perforation of the Schneiderian membrane. Methods: 52 subjects needing unilateral sinus floor elevation, with a residual crestal height from 2 mm to 5 mm, and a request for at least one implant-prosthetic rehabilitation in the posterior maxillary area were enrolled. Transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation was performed with injectable xenogeneic bone substitute in gel form. The sinus elevation was measured after the surgery and 6 months later with a CBCT. Average values were calculated for each measure. Results: 46 implants were simultaneously placed; six implants were placed after 4 months because of the lack of primary stability. All the placed implants, with a follow-up varying from 3 to 5 years after loading, osseointegrated successfully resulting in a survival rate of 100%. Average pre-operative bone height was 4.2 mm while after the surgery the average value reached was 10.1 mm with an average value of new bone gain of 6.43 mm. Histological analysis revealed the presence of 33.2% of vital bone. Clinical significance: Transcrestal sinus floor elevation with injectable xenogenic bone substitute in gel form is a minimally invasive technique that can reduce the incidence of Schneider membrane perforations, making a widely used method, such as sinus floor elevation, safer and less operator dependent.
Clinical application of modified minimally invasive incision in maxillary sinus lift and dental implantation surgery

Yong-bin MOU,Ran CHENG,LHao-xin,Lin CHEN,Yan-xiang ZHU,Zi-tong LIN

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13312/j.issn.1671-7783.y160266

2016-01-01

Abstract:Objective:To compare two invasive incision sizes in maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery for increasing the height of sinus floor and reducing the discomfort and complications of patients.Methods:Two different size of windows(6 mm ×6 mm and 10 mm ×15 mm)for maxillary sinus lift surgery were adopted in 29 cases(32 implants)with vertical bone mass defect in maxillary posterior,who would accept maxillary sinus floor elevation and implant placement surgery.The experimental(n =15)and control groups (n =14)were implanted artificial bone and implants simultaneouly.The evaluation of the discomfort of patients after surgery was evaluated at day 10 and 30 after surgery respectively.The height and width of alveolar bone at the bottom of the maxillary sinus floor were examined by CBCT scan at day 180 after opera-tion.Results:All the implants examined were shown with wonderful bone integration and the height and width of the maxillary sinus floor were significantly improved.Compared with the control group [(41.34 ± 6.54)minutes],the operation time in the experimental group [(40.23 ±5.42)minutes]had no signifi-cantly prolonged.The discomfort feeling of patients in the experimental group was better than that of control group at day 10 and day 30 after surgery.Conclusion:Small window approach with minimally invasive incision in the treatment of maxillary sinus floor is less invasive than the traditional approach.
The Comparative Evaluation of Transcrestal and Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation in Sites with Residual Bone Height ≤6 Mm: A Two-Year Prospective Randomized Study.

Yiqun Zhou,Yang Shi,Misi Si,Mengjie Wu,Zhijian Xie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13688

2020-01-01

Clinical Oral Implants Research

Abstract:OBJECTIVES To compare clinical and radiographic outcomes between transcrestal sinus floor elevation (TSFE) and lateral sinus floor elevation (LSFE) approaches of simultaneous implant placement in atrophic maxilla. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with a residual bone height (RBH) ≤6 mm were enrolled and randomly assigned to TSFE and LSFE groups. Patients in both groups simultaneously underwent sinus floor elevation with bovine-derived xenograft and implant placement. Clinical and radiographic results were evaluated immediately after surgery and after 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The endo-sinus bone gain (ESBG), apical implant bone height (ABH), endo-sinus bone-implant contact rate (EBICR), and crestal bone level (CBL) were assessed using panoramic radiographs. RESULTS Forty-one implants (TSFE: 21, LSFE: 20) were placed in cases with a mean RBH of 3.77 ±1.16 mm. All implants obtained clinical success and satisfactory ESBG at 24 months. No significant differences were found in ESBG and ABH between two groups immediately after surgery, but LSFE group showed significantly higher values than TSFE group thereafter. Grafts in TSFE group reached stability 6 months earlier than that in LSFE group. In both groups, EBICR was almost 100%, and CBL showed no detectable changes. CONCLUSIONS LSFE can achieve higher ESBG 2 years after surgery. Otherwise, TSFE could be an alternative to LSFE, when the access for lateral window preparation is limited. Both approaches were highly predictable for RBH ≤6 mm during 24-month observation period for the implants placed simultaneously.
Minimally invasive flap compared to a trapezoidal flap in lateral approach maxillary sinus elevation procedures: Four-month post-loading results from a split-mouth randomised controlled trial

Nicola Baldini,Chiara D'Elia,Raffaele Mirra,Marco Ferrari

Abstract:Purpose: To test a minimally invasive flap in the lateral approach for maxillary sinus floor elevation when compared to a trapezoidal flap. Materials and methods: Each patient received a bilateral sinus elevation procedure based on two different randomly allocated surgical approaches according to a split-mouth design: in the test side, a horizontal incision at mucogingival line was realised; in the control side, a trapezoidal flap was elevated to prepare the lateral window. Each sinus was filled using deproteinised bovine bone and the window covered with a collagen membrane. Implants were inserted according to a two-stage technique 6 months after sinus elevation procedures, submerged and then loaded after 6 months with definitive screw-retained metal-ceramic prostheses. Patients were followed up to 4 months post-loading. Outcome measures included: implant and prosthesis failures, complications, peri-implant marginal bone level changes, residual bone height and width, recorded before sinus augmentation and 180 days post-intervention by computed tomography (CT) scans, surgical times and patient discomfort data, assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) diagram for each treated side at 1, 7, 14 and 30 days of follow-up. Results: Seventeen patients were enrolled in this trial and none dropped out. Five completely edentulous patients were treated with full-arch prosthetic restorations (Toronto dental prosthesis) and 12 patients with partial metal-ceramic screw-retained prostheses. In total 72 implants were inserted, 37 in the test group and 35 in the control group. No prosthesis or implant failures occurred. A total of seven patients showed complications: five of them had complications in both test and control sides. Eight complications were detected in each group. During maxillary sinus elevation procedures, nine interventions (four from the test group and five from the control group) were affected by intrasurgical complications (six membrane perforations and three severe bleedings); post-surgical complications occurred to three patients (one submucosal emphysema in a patient from the test group, one wound dehiscence and a graft infection both recorded in the control group); a total of four implants in two patients in the test group, versus three implants from one patient in the control group showed peri-implant mucositis. There were no statistically significant differences in complications between the two groups (P = 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15-3.11). Patients from the control group, at 4 months after loading, lost on average 0.53 mm (standard deviation [SD] 0.27; 95% CI: 0.40-0.65), and patients from the test group lost on average 0.66 mm (SD 0.27; 95% CI: 0.53-0.78); the difference was not statistically significant (mean difference: 0.07 mm; SD 0.34; 95% CI: -0.03-0.17; P = 0.102). Significant values for bone augmentation in height, 9.26 mm (SD 1.46; 95% CI: 8.56-9.95) in the test group and 9.38 mm (SD 1.95; 95% CI: 8.45-10.30) in the control group, and width, 1.68 mm (SD 1.04; 95% CI: 1.18-2.20) in the test group and 1.60 mm (SD 1.27; 95% CI: 0.99-2.20) in the control group, were found from the 180-day CT scans. No statistically significant differences were detected between the two groups, either for the bone augmentation data (difference: 0.27 mm; 95% CI: 0.15-0.38; P = 0.60) or for the bone width values (difference: 0.02 mm; 95% CI: 0.07-0.11; P = 0.67). A significant reduction in the total surgical time was found in the test group (mean difference: 6.64 minutes; SD 4.32; 95% CI: 4.58-8.69), with the difference being statistically significant (P = 0.009). Evaluation of patients' postoperative discomfort showed a significant preference for the test procedure: at 1 day the VAS value was 4 (interquartile range [IQR] 2 to 5) in the test group; in the control group the VAS score was 5 (IQR 4 to 8). The intergroup difference was statistically significant (P = 0.002). At the 7-day follow-up, the VAS value was 1 in the test group (IQR 0 to 3) and 3 in the control group (IQR 0 to 7), this difference was statistically significant (P = 0.003). No differences were detected at 14 and 30 days (P > 0.05). Conclusions: A minimally invasive approach to access the sinus cavity can be as successful as a conventional trapezoidal flap in maxillary sinus floor elevations.
[Evaluation of Clinical Results on Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation and Dental Implant Placement (122 Cases Report)].

Li-xin Qiu,Xiu-lian Hu,Bo Chen,Jian-hui Li,Ye Lin,Xing Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:1002-0098.2006.03.003

2006-01-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVETo evaluate the clinical results of osteotome sinus floor elevation technique in the posterior maxillary region.METHODSA total of 122 patients underwent osteotome sinus floor elevation from July 1998 to July 2004. Forty-eight cases were male and 74 were female. The mean age was 46.5 years (between 20 and 69). A total of 157 implants were placed and restored. The mean follow-up time was 29.7 months (between 14 and 84 months). Clinical examination and radiographs were conducted. All the patients with 8 - 11 mm height of residual bone in the posterior maxilla underwent sinus floor elevation and implant placement using osteotome without any bone grafts simultaneously. The elevation height was 2 - 5 mm. Healing abutments were connected at the same time of implant placement with insertion torque over 0.25 N.m and the final prostheses were restored after 3 - 4 months. Implants were submerged if the insertion torque was less than 0.25 N.m. Second-stage operation was conducted 3 - 4 months later and the implants were restored afterwards.RESULTSSinus membrane perforation was observed in 12 cases, no sinus complication was observed during the follow-up. All of the 157 implants gained osteointegration and were restored. No implant lost was observed during the follow-up. All the patients were satisfied with the final prostheses.CONCLUSIONSOsteotome sinus floor elevation without any bone graft was a predictable and safe technique. It could be used in the maxillary posterior area implant placement with residual bone volume of 8 - 11 mm.
Modified Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation Via A Mini-Lateral Window With Simultaneous Placement Of Dental Implants: A Clinical And Radiographical Study

Liqin Zhu,Liangru He,Qun Wang,Xiaoyi Chen,Junhua Xu,Huiming Wang

2017-01-01

Abstract:This study assessed the effectiveness of modified sinus floor elevation via a mini-lateral window with simultaneous placement of implants in 20 patients with severely atrophic maxilla. Patients received mini-round-like or a mini-slot osteotomy which was done to establish an access on the lateral sinus wall for placement of bone grafts depending on the number of inserted implants and the characteristics of sinus floor. Clinical and radiographic parameters were collected. Results showed all implants were well maintained, with 100% cumulative success rate. The mean residual, immediate and 6-month postoperative augmented bone height was 3.0 +/- 0.5, 13.6 +/- 0.9, and 13.2 +/- 0.8 mm, respectively. Intra-operative and 6-month postoperative implant stability quotient (ISQ) were 61.2 +/- 3.7 and 76.8 +/- 2.4, respectively. No significant differences were found in clinical outcomes between two types of window approaches. Sinus augmentation via a mini window with simultaneous placement of implants has a higher success rate, may improve clinical outcome and thus can be used as a reliable treatment for severely atrophic maxilla.
Immediate implant placement combined with maxillary sinus floor elevation utilizing the transalveolar approach and nonsubmerged healing for failing teeth in the maxillary molar area: A randomized controlled trial clinical study with one-year follow-up

Hanqing Liu,Renzhang Liu,Mingzhen Wang,Jianjun Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12783

Abstract:Background: In previous studies, immediate implant placement in molar sites has been widely applied. Purpose: To study the clinical effect and feasibility of immediate implant placement combined with maxillary sinus floor elevation utilizing the transalveolar approach and nonsubmerged healing for failing teeth in the maxillary molar area. Material and methods: Patients who required implantation surgry to replace a failing tooth in the maxilla molar region were selected. Patients were randomized into two groups: immediate implant placement combined with maxillary sinus floor elevation utilizing the transalveolar approach and nonsubmerged healing (test group) or delayed implant placement combined with maxillary sinus floor elevation utilizing the transalveolar approach and nonsubmerged healing (control group). The outcome criteria were the success rates of implants, Cone Beam Computer Tomography (CBCT) data and results of the subjective satisfaction survey performed with a visual analog scale (VAS). Results: All implants had good initial stability after implantation. The survival rate of implants was 100% at 1-year follow-up. At the time of permanent restoration, the differences in average horizontal shrinkage of alveolar bone (W1) on the buccal side between the test group (0.65 ± 0.12 mm) and the control group (1.23 ± 0.32 mm) were statistically significant (P < .0001); however, no statistically significant difference (P = .515) was observed on the palatal side (0.3 ± 0.10 mm vs 0.28 ± 0.08 mm). The difference in vertical resorption of alveolar bone (H1) on the buccal side between the test group (0.60 ± 0.18 mm) and the control group (1.53 ± 0.19 mm) was statistically significant (P < .0001), but no statistically significant difference (P = .190) in the reduction of palatal alveolar bone (0.24 ± 0.12 mm vs 0.29 ± 0.13 mm) was observed. After 1-year loading, no statistically significant difference (P > .05) in vertical or horizontal changes (W2, H2) were identified in the test group or control group. Patient satisfaction in both groups was similar (8.36 ± 1.01 vs 8.14 ± 1.35), and the difference between groups was not statistically significant (P = .638). Conclusion: Immediate implant placement combined with maxillary sinus floor elevation utilizing the transalveolar approach and nonsubmerged healing is feasible for the maxillary molar area, and the clinical effect is satisfactory.
Two-dimensional scanning capacitance microscopy measurements of cross-sectioned very large scale integration test structures

G. Neubauer,A. Erickson,C. Williams,J. Kopanski,M. Rodgers,D. Adderton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1116/1.588487

Abstract:Scanning probe technology, with its inherent two‐dimensionality, offers unique capabilities for the measurement of electrical properties on a nanoscale. We have developed a setup which uses scanning capacitancemicroscopy (SCM) to obtain electrical information of cross‐sectioned samples while simultaneously acquiring conventional topographical atomic force microscopy(AFM) data. In an extension of our work on very large scale integration cross sections, we have now obtained one‐dimensional and two‐dimensional SCM data of cross sections of blanket‐implanted, annealed Si wafers as well as special test structures on Si. We find excellent agreement of total implant depth obtained from SCM signals of these cross‐sectioned samples with conventional secondary ion mass spectrometry(SIMS) profiles of the same samples. Although no modeling for a direct correlation between signal output and absolute concentration has yet been attempted, we have inferred quantitative dopant concentrations from correlation to SIMS depth profiles obtained on the same sample. By these means of indirect modeling, we have found that our SCM technique is sensitive to carrier density concentrations varying over several orders of magnitude, i.e., <1×1015 to 1×1020 atoms/cm3, with a lateral resolution of 20–150 nm, depending on tip and dopant level.
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of the Two-Window Technique Without Membrane Versus the Solo-Window Technique with Membrane over the Osteotomy Window for Maxillary Sinus Augmentation

Huajie Yu,Danqing He,Lixin Qiu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12547

2017-01-01

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Abstract:BackgroundMaturation of the grafted volume after lateral sinus elevation is crucial for the long-term survival of dental implants. PurposeTo compare endo-sinus histomorphometric bone formation between the solo- and two-window maxillary sinus augmentation techniques with or without membrane coverage for the rehabilitation of multiple missing posterior teeth. Materials and MethodsPatients with severely atrophic posterior maxillae were randomized to receive lateral sinus floor elevation via the solo-window technique with membrane coverage (Control Group) or the two-window technique without coverage (Test Group). Six months after surgery, bone core specimens harvested from the lateral aspect were histomorphometrically analyzed. ResultsTen patients in each group underwent 21 maxillary sinus augmentations. Histomorphometric analysis revealed mean newly formed bone values of 26.0816.23% and 27.14 +/- 18.11%, mean connective tissue values of 59.34 +/- 12.42% and 50.03 +/- 17.13%, and mean residual graft material values of 14.6 +/- 14.56% and 22.78 +/- 10.83% in the Test and Control Groups, respectively, with no significant differences. ConclusionsThe two-window technique obtained comparative maturation of the grafted volume even without membrane coverage, and is a viable alternative for the rehabilitation of severely atrophic posterior maxillae with multiple missing posterior teeth.
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Two-Window Versus Solo-Window Technique by Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation in Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: Results from a 1-Year Observational Phase.

Huajie Yu,Lixin Qiu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12505

2017-01-01

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Abstract:Background: Implant failures are more common when multiple missing posterior teeth need lateral sinus floor elevation owing to inadequate tissue maturation after grafting. Effects of lateral window dimensions on vital bone formation have rarely been compared. Purpose: To compare endo-sinus bone formation between two- and solo-window techniques to rehabilitate multiple missing posterior teeth that need substantial augmentation. Methods and materials: Patients with severely atrophic posterior maxilla were randomized to receive lateral sinus floor elevation via solo or two bony windows. Bone core specimens harvested from lateral aspect of the augmentation sites were histomorphometrically analyzed. Proportions of mineralized bone (MB), bone substitute materials (BS), and nonmineralized tissue (NMT) were quantified. Results: Twenty-one patients underwent 23 maxillary sinus augmentations. One patient in each group dropped out during the follow-up period. Lateral window dimensions were 81.65 +/- 4.59 and 118.04 +/- 19.53 mm(2) in the test and control groups, respectively. Histomorphometric analysis revealed mean MB of 42.32%+/- 13.07% and 26.00%+/- 15.23%, BS of 40.34%+/- 9.52% and 60.03%+/- 10.13%, and NMT of 18.14%+/- 14.24% and 14.75%+/- 10.38% in test and control groups, respectively, with significant differences. Conclusion: The two-window technique could facilitate faster maturation and consolidation of the grafted volume and is an effective alternative for rehabilitation of severely atrophic posterior maxilla with multiple missing posterior teeth.
Influence of Lateral Windows with Decreased Vertical Height Following Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation: A 1-Year Clinical and Radiographic Study.

Wei Lu,Jin Xu,Hui-ming Wang,Fu-ming He

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.6213

2018-01-01

The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants

Abstract:PURPOSETo verify whether lateral sinus floor elevation (LSFE) with the vertical height of the osteotomy decreased to 3 to 5 mm can achieve improvement compared with a conventional lateral window in terms of implant survival, graft stability, and related complications.MATERIALS AND METHODSOf the 49 patients who were selected for inclusion in this retrospective study, 25 patients were in the test group and 24 were in the control group based on the vertical height of the lateral window. Each patient received the LSFE treatment using deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) based on the two different vertical heights of the lateral window (test group: 3 to 5 mm; control group: 6 to 8 mm in vertical height). Residual bone dimensions were measured preoperatively, and graft dimensions were measured immediately after the procedure (baseline), 6 months (T1), and 1 year (T2) postoperatively on the basis of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. CBCT scan data at the baseline were analyzed with image processing software to evaluate the volume of augmented material, and they were transformed into three-dimensional reconstruction images to calibrate the window dimension. Implant failure and recorded intraoperative and postoperative complications were counted.RESULTSA prominent augmented graft height was obtained in both groups (test group: 9.48 ± 3.27 mm; control group: 10.44 ± 3.01 mm) with no significant difference; likewise, no difference was observed concerning augmented graft volume. Neither cumulative survival rate (CSR) nor augmented graft height decrement had any statistical intergroup difference during each follow-up interval. CSRs were detected as 100% for the test group and 94.28% and 91.67% for the control group based on implants and patients, respectively. Intraoperative membrane perforation was reported in two cases with a few nosebleeds the first night in the test group, while one case occurred in the control group. All the perforations were successfully sealed intraoperatively by a collagen membrane.CONCLUSIONOsteotomy of LSFE with decreased vertical height yielded similar results to the control group with conventional dimensions in terms of implant survival, graft stability, and related complications with 1 year of follow-up. Notwithstanding, a prospective split-mouth randomized controlled trial with long-term observation is imperative to further investigate the influence of decreased vertical height of the lateral window on maturation and consolidation of DBBM.

[Clinical significance of complement analysis in collagen diseases].

Comparative Evaluation of Endo-sinus Bone Augmentation after Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation Without Grafting Using Two Radiographic Methods.

Evaluation of New Bone Formation after Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation and Simultaneous Implant Placement Without Grafting by Two Radiographic Methods

Changes in Bone Graft Height and Influencing Factors after Sinus Floor Augmentation by Using the Lateral Window Approach: A Clinical Retrospective Study of 1 to 2 Years.

Repositioning of the Bone Window in Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation with Simultaneous Implant Placement: A Retrospective Radiographic Study.

The Relation Between Morphology of Maxillary Sinus after Augmentation in Three Classification Methods and Residual Bone Height: A Retrospective Study

Sinus Floor Elevation and Simultaneous Dental Implantation: A Long Term Retrospective Study of Sinus Bone Gain

Endoscope-assisted Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation with a Mini-Lateral Window: A Retrospective Study

Clinical and radiographic changes following transcrestal sinus augmentation: A scoping review of the last 25 years

[Clinical evaluation of josamycin for the treatment of Mycoplasma pneumonia in children].

Transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation with injectable xenogeneic bone substitute in gel form: A clinical, radiological and histological analysis

Clinical application of modified minimally invasive incision in maxillary sinus lift and dental implantation surgery

The Comparative Evaluation of Transcrestal and Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation in Sites with Residual Bone Height ≤6 Mm: A Two-Year Prospective Randomized Study.

Minimally invasive flap compared to a trapezoidal flap in lateral approach maxillary sinus elevation procedures: Four-month post-loading results from a split-mouth randomised controlled trial

[Evaluation of Clinical Results on Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation and Dental Implant Placement (122 Cases Report)].

Modified Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation Via A Mini-Lateral Window With Simultaneous Placement Of Dental Implants: A Clinical And Radiographical Study

Immediate implant placement combined with maxillary sinus floor elevation utilizing the transalveolar approach and nonsubmerged healing for failing teeth in the maxillary molar area: A randomized controlled trial clinical study with one-year follow-up

Two-dimensional scanning capacitance microscopy measurements of cross-sectioned very large scale integration test structures

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of the Two-Window Technique Without Membrane Versus the Solo-Window Technique with Membrane over the Osteotomy Window for Maxillary Sinus Augmentation

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Two-Window Versus Solo-Window Technique by Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation in Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: Results from a 1-Year Observational Phase.

Influence of Lateral Windows with Decreased Vertical Height Following Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation: A 1-Year Clinical and Radiographic Study.