Abstract:Introduction Governments around the globe now seek to judge the performance of their public services. This has given rise to the introduction of a range of complex and sophisticated regimes to provide information to politicians, managers and the public on organizational success or failures. Examples include an index of measures of performance of Chinese cities (China Daily 2004), the Comprehensive Performance Assessment in English local government (Audit Commission 2002), the Government Performance Results Act 1992 in the US, the Service Improvement Initiative in Canada, the Putting Service First scheme in Australia, Strategic Results Area Networks in New Zealand, Management by Results in Sweden, and Regulation of Performance Management and Policy Evaluation in the Netherlands (Pollitt and Bouckaert 2004). Researchers have increasingly turned their attention to public service performance (e.g., see the Symposium edition of Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2005 (Boyne and Walker 2005), on the determinants of performance in public organizations). Despite such progress, a persistent problem for public management researchers and practitioners has been the conceptualisation and measurement of performance. Previous research has shown that organizational performance is multifaceted (Boyne 2003; Carter et al . 1992; Quinn and Rohrbaugh 1983; Venkatraman and Ramanujuam 1986). This is because public organizations are required to address a range of goals, some of which may be in conflict. Consequently, public organizations are obliged to focus attention on multiple dimensions of performance. Boyne's (2002) review of these dimensions isolated five conceptual categories – outputs, efficiency, effectiveness, responsiveness and democratic outcomes.

Promoting the Public Service Performance Evaluation: an Alternative View from Performance Culture Perspective

Basic Theoretical Analysis of Performance Evaluation of Public Cultural Services

Using PROMETHEE in the Evaluation of NPOs' Performance

Assessment of Innovative Performance Management in Chinese Police System

Performance Evaluation of Public Institutions: a Chinese Case

Public Service Performance: Subjective and objective measures of organizational performance: An empirical exploration

Public Participation in Government Performance Evaluation

Discussion on public hospital social performance evaluation

Public Service Motivation and Performance: The Role of Organizational Identification

Performance Evaluation Of Public-Private Partnership In Infrastructure Development In China: An Overview

The role and influencing factors of government performance evaluation: A test of Chinese public officials’ perceptions in Gaoming district

The Impact of Societal Culture on the Use of Performance Strategies in East Asia: Evidence from a Comparative Survey

Establishing a Teacher Performance Evaluation System Geared to the Cultivation of Character: With a Reflection on New Public Management Theory

ANALYSING PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT IN PUBLIC SERVICES: HOW USEFUL IS THE CONCEPT OF A PERFORMANCE REGIME?

What Values Are Evaluated? an Exploratory Empirical Study of the Public Values Structure in Chinese Local Government Performance Evaluation Through the Case of the ‘hangzhou Model’

Research on the Performance Evaluation Model of Functional Technologies with Partial Least Squares Regression

Public Participation, Expert Knowledge and Performance Evaluation Mode of the Government:An Inquiry for Analytical Framework of Performance Evaluation Mode of the Government

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND CITIZEN SATISFACTION WITH THE GOVERNMENT: EVIDENCE FROM CHINESE MUNICIPALITIES

Performance Management Systems (PMS): Challenges and Opportunities in the Public Sector

Service Performance Evaluation Promotes the Sustainable Development of Information Resources Sharing

Evaluation of Public Service Quality:Foreign Experience and Reform Orientation in China