Abstract:Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery (sCAIS) for tooth-supported free-end dental implantation with the aid/and without the aid of fixation pins to secure the surgical template through comparison between planned, 3D printed guide position and placement implant position. Materials and methods: Thirty-two duplicated maxillary resin models were used in the present in vitro study. Digital planning was performed and fabrication of a surgical template that allowed implant placement on the distal extension edentulous site of the model (maxillary left side). A first optical scan was performed after fitting the surgical template on the model to assess the deviation at the surgical guide level. After placing implants in the model using the surgical guide, scan bodies were attached to the implants, and a second scan was performed to record the position of placed implants. The digital representations were later superimposed to the pre-operative scan and measurements of implant deviations were performed. Global (coronal and apical), horizontal (coronal and apical), depth and angular deviations were recorded between planned implant position, guide position, and placement implant position. Three-way ANOVA was used to compare implant location (#13, 14, and 15), fixation pin (with or without pin), and guide comparison (planned, guided, and placement). Results: Final implant placement based on the digital plan and based on the 3D printed guide were very similar except for depth deviation. Use of fixation pin had a statistically significant effect on the depth and angular deviation. Overall, without fixation pins and based on guide versus placement, mean global coronal (0.88 ± 0.36 mm), horizontal coronal (0.55 ± 0.32 mm), and apical (1.44 ± 0.75 mm), and angular deviations (4.28 ± 2.01°) were similar to deviations with fixation pins: mean global coronal (0.88 ± 0.36 mm); horizontal coronal (0.67 ± 0.22 mm) and apical (1.60 ± 0.69 mm); and angular deviations (4.53 ± 2.04°). Horizontal apical without pins (1.63 ± 0.69 mm) and with fixation pins (1.72 ± 0.70 mm) was statistically significant (p = 0.044). Depth deviation without pins (-0.5 ± 0.5 mm) and with fixation pins (-0.16 ± 0.62 mm) was also statistically significant (p = 0.005). Further analysis demonstrated that the final sleeve position on the 3D printed guide was on average 0.5 mm more coronal than the digital plan. Conclusions: The use of surgical guides with or without fixation pins can provide clinically acceptable outcomes in terms of accuracy in implant position. There was a statistically significant difference in the accuracy of implant position when utilizing fixation pins only for horizontal apical and depth deviation. Additionally, a statistically significant difference between the planned and the 3D printed surgical guide when considering the sleeve position was detected.

Are Sleeves Necessary in Static Computer‐Assisted Implant Surgery? A Comparative In Vitro Analysis

Sleeveless guided implant placement compared to conventional approaches: An in vitro study at healed sites and fresh extraction sockets

Accuracy of open‐sleeved vs. closed‐sleeved static computer‐assisted implant systems in immediate maxillary molar implant placement: An in vitro study

Comparison of Different Types of Static Computer-Guided Implant Surgery in Varying Bone Inclinations

How Accurate Is Oral Implant Installation Using Surgical Guides Printed from a Degradable and Steam-Sterilized Biopolymer?

The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery

Accuracy of a Milled Digital Implant Surgical Guide: an in Vitro Study

Deviations of different systems for guided implant surgery

Influence of 3D-printing method, resin material, and sterilization on the accuracy of virtually designed surgical implant guides

Accuracy of template‐based guided dental implant placement—An in vitro comparison of different manufacturing methods

Accuracy of immediately placed implants using surgical guides from different 3-dimensional printers: An in vitro study

Comparison of accuracy between single posterior immediate and delayed implants placed using computer guided implant surgery and a digital laser printed surgical guide: A clinical investigation

An in vitro analysis of the accuracy of static and robot‐assisted implant surgery

In vitro study on the accuracy of sleeveless guided endodontics and treatment of a complex upper lateral incisor

In vitro and in vivo accuracy of autonomous robotic vs. fully guided static computer‐assisted implant surgery

Comparative evaluation of accuracy of implants placed with thermoplastic and three-dimensional-printed surgical guides: A randomized controlled trial

Accuracy of implant placement with computer-aided static, dynamic, and robot-assisted surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

Accuracy of Guided Implant Surgery in the Partially Edentulous Jaw Using Digital impression versus Desktop Scanner and CBCT cast scan: Randomized Clinical Trial

Accuracy of a 3D Printed Sleeveless Guide System Used for Fiber Post Removal: an in Vitro Study.

Accuracy of Computer-Guided Implant Surgery by a CAD/CAM and Laser Scanning Technique.

Accuracy Assessment of Implant Placement with Versus Without a CAD/CAM Surgical Guide by Novices Versus Specialists Via the Digital Registration Method: an in Vitro Randomized Crossover Study.