Abstract:Background The real-time surgical navigation system for improving the accuracy of implants placement has been tested and validated in various clinical cases. Most kinds of errors have been profoundly investigated to evaluate the accuracy. However, the application error associated with the surgeon is hard to eliminate and usually is negligible in the current studies. In order to avoid human error maximally, surgical automatic robot system can be introduced to eliminate it with successful outcome. Aim/Hypothesis To evaluate the accuracy of real time surgical navigation-robot system in placement of dental implants in the severely atrophic edentulous maxilla. In this model study, zygomatic implant (ZI), which is with a length of 50 mm was introduced to verify the reliability of this automatic robot system. Material and Methods To simulate the edentulous maxilla, six phantoms were fabricated according to rapid prototype with fused deposition modeling technology. Bone-anchored fixed titanium mini-screws (diameter 1.0 mm, length 9.0 mm, square cavity 1.0 mm) (CIBEI, Shanghai, China) were served as fiducial markers, and the phantoms then underwent CBCT scanning (i-CAT, Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, PA+ 0.39 mm pixel+ 0.5 mm slice thickness). The DICOM data were transferred to a planning software (DentalHelper, Shanghai, China). Each phantom received two ZIs. The intraoral coronal entry points of implants were at or near the top of the alveolar crest at the level of the second premolar first molar region. Pre-operation planning was set up in surgical navigation system (OralImplantPlanningV1.0, Shanghai, China) and guided robot arm (Universal Robot UR6, Odense, Denmark) to perform automatically trajectory drilling procedure. Results The entry deviations, exit deviations and angle deviations of twelve 50 mm ZIs between preoperatively planned and postoperatively placed implants were measured in this study. The mean deviations of entry points was 2.34 ± 0.79 mm (range from 1.25 to 3.25 mm). The mean deviations of exit points was 2.57 ± 1.73 mm (range from 0.21 to 4.23 mm). The mean deviations of angle was 2.76 ± 1.39 degrees (range from 1.10 to 5.01 degrees). Conclusions and Clinical Implications Despite the limitations of the present study, the automatic robotic system could achieve accept planned-placed accuracy in ZIs placement.

In vitro and in vivo accuracy of autonomous robotic vs. fully guided static computer‐assisted implant surgery

Accuracy of dental implant surgery with robotic position feedback and registration algorithm: An <i>in</i>-<i>vitro</i> study

An in vitro analysis of the accuracy of static and robot‐assisted implant surgery

Accuracy of an autonomous dental implant robotic system versus static guide-assisted implant surgery: A retrospective clinical study

Accuracy of implant placement with computer-aided static, dynamic, and robot-assisted surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

Accuracy of robotic computer‐assisted implant surgery for immediate implant placement: A retrospective case series study

A Comparative Prospective Study on the Accuracy and Efficiency of Autonomous Robotic System Versus Dynamic Navigation System in Dental Implant Placement

Accuracy of Intraoperative Measuring Guide and Conventional Surgical Guide in Anterior Implant Surgery: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

Accuracy of robotic computer-assisted implant surgery for immediate implant placement: A retrospective case series study

Accuracy of an autonomous dental implant robotic system in placing tilted implants for edentulous arches

Advancing accuracy in guided implant placement: A comprehensive meta-analysis: Meta-Analysis evaluation of the accuracy of available implant placement Methods

Accuracy of an autonomous dental implant robotic system in dental implant surgery

Accuracy of autonomous robotic surgery for single-tooth implant placement: A case series

The accuracy of surgical automatic robotic assisted implants placement in edentulous maxilla - an in vitro study

Accuracy of Zygomatic Implant Placement Using Task‐Autonomous Robotic System or Dynamic Navigation: An In Vitro Study

Accuracy assessment of robot-assisted implant surgery in dentistry: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Accuracy analysis of robotic-assisted immediate implant placement: a retrospective case series

Accuracy of the Yakebot dental implant robotic system versus fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery template in edentulous jaw implantation: A preliminary clinical study

Accuracy of dental implant placement using augmented reality-based navigation, static computer assisted implant surgery, and the free-hand method: An in vitro study

Accuracy of autonomous robotic surgery for dental implant placement in fully edentulous patients: A retrospective case series study

Comparison of the positional accuracy of robotic guided dental implant placement with static guided and dynamic navigation systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis