Abstract:Statement of problem: Robotic systems have shown promise for implant placement because of their accuracy in identifying surgical positions. However, research on the accuracy of patient calibration methods based on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scanner (IOS) data registration is lacking. Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to develop a calibration method based on the registration of CBCT and IOS data of a robot-assisted system for implant placement, evaluate the accuracy of this calibration method, and explore the accuracy of robot-assisted surgery at different implant positions. Material and methods: Twenty standardized, polyurethane, partially edentulous maxillary typodonts were divided into 2 groups: one group used a calibration method based solely on CBCT data (CBCT group), and the other used a calibration method based on the registration of CBCT and IOS data (IOS group). Four implants were planned for each typodont in the right second premolar, left central incisor, left first premolar, and left second molar positions. The robot performed the osteotomies and implant placement step by step according to the preoperative plan. The operating software program automatically measured the deviation between the planned and actual implant position. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the least significant difference (LSD) post hoc test (α=.05) were used to analyze differences between the test groups. Results: The angular deviation and 3-dimensional deviations at implant platform and apex between the 2 calibration methods did not significantly differ among the 4 implant positions (P>.05). The horizontal and depth deviations at the implant platform and apex levels between the 2 calibration methods did not significantly differ among the 4 implant positions (P>.05). In the anterior region (left central incisor), the CBCT group showed higher horizontal deviation at both the implant platform and apex compared with the IOS group (P<.05). Conversely, the IOS group had greater depth deviation at both the implant platform and apex than the CBCT group (P<.05). In the posterior region, with or without distal extension (right second premolar, left first premolar, and left second molar), no statistically significant differences were found between the 2 calibration methods (P>.05). Conclusions: The calibration method that was based on the registration of CBCT and IOS data demonstrated high accuracy. No significant differences in the accuracy of the calibration methods for robot-assisted implant placement were found between the CBCT group and IOS group.

Accuracy of an autonomous dental implant robotic system in dental implant surgery

Accuracy of dental implant surgery with robotic position feedback and registration algorithm: An <i>in</i>-<i>vitro</i> study

Accuracy of an autonomous dental implant robotic system versus static guide-assisted implant surgery: A retrospective clinical study

Accuracy of an autonomous dental implant robotic system in placing tilted implants for edentulous arches

Accuracy of an autonomous dental implant robotic system in partial edentulism: A pilot clinical study

Clinical evaluation of autonomous robotic‐assisted full‐arch implant surgery: A 1‐year prospective clinical study

[Animal Experiment on the Accuracy of the Autonomous Dental Implant Robotic System].

Accuracy of autonomous robotic surgery for single-tooth implant placement: A case series

Accuracy of autonomous robotic surgery for dental implant placement in fully edentulous patients: A retrospective case series study

Accuracy of robotic surgery for dental implant placement: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Accuracy of dental implant placement with a robotic system in partially edentulous patients: A prospective, single-arm clinical trial

The accuracy of surgical automatic robotic assisted implants placement in edentulous maxilla - an in vitro study

Accuracy assessment of robot-assisted implant surgery in dentistry: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Accuracy of Immediate Dental Implant Placement with Task-Autonomous Robotic System and Navigation System: an in Vitro Study

Accuracy of robotic computer-assisted implant surgery for immediate implant placement: A retrospective case series study

Accuracy of a calibration method based on cone beam computed tomography and intraoral scanner data registration for robot-assisted implant placement: An in vitro study

Accuracy of dental implant surgery using dynamic navigation and robotic systems: An in vitro study

Accuracy analysis of robotic-assisted immediate implant placement: a retrospective case series

Accuracy of dental implant surgery with robotic position feedback and registration algorithm: An in-vitro study

In vitro and in vivo accuracy of autonomous robotic vs. fully guided static computer‐assisted implant surgery

A Comparative Prospective Study on the Accuracy and Efficiency of Autonomous Robotic System Versus Dynamic Navigation System in Dental Implant Placement