How will we know patients are safer? An organization-wide approach to measuring and improving safety

Peter Pronovost, Christine G Holzmueller, Dale M Needham, J Bryan Sexton, Marlene Miller, Sean Berenholtz, Albert W Wu, Trish M Perl, Richard Davis, David Baker, Laura Winner, Laura Morlock
2006-07-01
Abstract:Objective:Our institution, like many, is struggling to develop measures that answer the question, How do we know we are safer? Our objectives are to present a framework to evaluate performance in patient safety and describe how we applied this model in intensive care units.Design:We focus on measures of safety rather than broader measures of quality. The measures will allow health care organizations to evaluate whether they are safer now than in the past by answering the following questions: How often do we harm patients? How often do patients receive the appropriate interventions? How do we know we learned from defects? How well have we created a culture of safety? The first two measures are rate based, whereas the latter two are qualitative. To improve care within institutions, caregivers must be engaged, must participate in the selection and development of measures, and must receive feedback …
What problem does this paper attempt to address?