The problem with making Safety-II work in healthcare

Merel J Verhagen,Marit S de Vos,Mark Sujan,Jaap F Hamming

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014396

2022-03-18

Abstract:'The problem with...' series covers controversial topics related to efforts to improve healthcare quality, including widely recommended, but deceptively difficult strategies for improvement and pervasive problems that seem to resist solution. Introduction Patient safety is typically assessed by the frequency of adverse events or incidents, which means we seek to determine safety by its absence rather than its presence.1 The Safety-II perspective aspires to overcome this paradox by bringing into focus situations where safety is actually present, that is, in everyday work that usually goes well.2 Central to Safety-II is the notion that, in complex systems such as healthcare, safety is a consequence of collective efforts to adapt to dynamic conditions and uncertainty, rather than the natural state of a system where nothing untoward happens. This type of thinking has been met with significant interest and enthusiasm in healthcare,3–6

health care sciences & services,health policy & services