Abstract:417 Background: Lean Six Sigma Visual Management dashboards, or scorecards, are visual tools designed to drive and improve quality patient care, operationalize best practices, and promote a culture of operational excellence. Practice scorecards create a disciplined problem-solving culture where root causes are identified, and systemic process-based improvements are implemented. Scorecards are created to show full practice data transparency, allowing all employees and sites to see each other’s data. Scorecards are designed so that providers can efficiently review the maximum amount of data, following a Green, Yellow, Red visual cue to signify goal adherence. Methods: Phase 1 (2018 – 2019): Clinical scorecards were created and introduced to all staff on a weekly basis focusing on a few key patient metrics (ex: pain scale, pain care plan, ACP, PHQ-9, teaching/consents, patient portal access). Phase 2 (2020 – 2022): Clinical scorecards were expanded with additional patient care initiatives. New nurse navigator scorecards created (ex: patient teaching and survivorship visits). New physician and APP scorecards created with practice-specific provider metrics. Phase 3 (2023 – 2024): Scorecards updated yearly to match practice quality initiatives. New dashboards for non-clinical employees initiated. Physician and APP compensation changed to include quality metric performance tied to financial incentive. Results: Over the course of 5 years, OHC quality scorecard metrics improved from below national averages (red) to exceeding top-tier threshold goals (green). Scorecard utilization increased across all areas of the business, expanding from one scorecard in 2018 to eight in 2024. Scorecards increased overall practice data transparency leading to increase practice quality metric performance. OHC staff utilize scorecards on a weekly, monthly, and quarterly basis to drive quality improvement adherence. Improved outcomes through full data transparency increased staff participation and ownership in quality metrics and led to achieved shared savings in managed care programs. Example of metrics and results: Patient NCCN Staging 36% (2588/7263) to 96% (10299/10749), Teaching/Consents 37% (423/1147) to 97% (3067/3160), and Oral regimen NCCN entry 69% (586/845) to 98% (1037/1055). Conclusions: Visual Management dashboards or practice scorecards are instrumental in driving and supporting practice change. Scorecards allowed OHC staff to efficiently visualize practice-wide actionable data with eye-catching colors to promote optimal clinical performance. As increased data procurement is on the rise, practices can empower their staff to drive change through data utilization. OHC’s scorecards have proven to bridge the gap to goal, facilitate transparent data sharing, and empower providers and staff toward collaboration and embracing operational excellence.

Board Quality Scorecards: Measuring Improvement

Board Oversight of Patient Care Quality in Large Nonprofit Health Systems

Overseeing oversight: governance of quality and safety by hospital boards in the English NHS

Hospital on a page: standardizing data presentation to drive quality improvement

An Exploratory Analysis of the Association between Hospital Quality Measures and Financial Performance

Quality improvement scorecards driving innovation and best practice in a large community oncology practice.

Measuring against clinical standards

"We measure what we can measure": Struggles in defining and evaluating institutional review board quality

Hospital board oversight of quality and safety: a stakeholder analysis exploring the role of trust and intelligence

Do Experts Understand Performance Measures? A Mixed-Methods Study of Infection Preventionists

The internal processes and behavioral dynamics of hospital boards: an exploration of differences between high- and low-performing hospitals

Assessing Performance and Quality After Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes

From Reporting to Improving: How Root Cause Analysis in Teams Shape Patient Safety Culture

The relationship between patients' perception of care and measures of hospital quality and safety

ACCF/AHA/ACR/SCAI/SIR/SVM/SVN/SVS 2010 Performance Measures for Adults with Peripheral Artery Disease

Board level “Picture-Understanding-Action”: a new way of looking at quality

Developing risk management dashboards using risk and quality measures: A visual best practices approach

Development and implementation of a balanced scorecard in an academic hospitalist group

Public Board Score Reporting Undermines Holistic Review for Residency Selection

Proposed Quality Metrics for Congenital Cardiac Anesthesia: A Scoping Review

The balanced scorecard: a potent tool for energizing and focusing healthcare organization management