Time to refocus for South Korean science

Bec Crew

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-02684-z

IF: 64.8

2024-08-23

Nature

Abstract:Facing challenges on multiple fronts, the country needs to rethink its approaches to research and innovation. Facing challenges on multiple fronts, the country needs to rethink its approaches to research and innovation.

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Can South Korea regain its edge in innovation?

James Mitchell Crow

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-02689-8

IF: 64.8

2024-08-23

Nature

Abstract:The country's record of adaptability and reinvention might stand it in good stead as it strives to get back on track. The country's record of adaptability and reinvention might stand it in good stead as it strives to get back on track.

multidisciplinary sciences
How South Korea's science stars are finding success

Sandy Ong,Benjamin Plackett

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-02687-w

IF: 64.8

2024-08-23

Nature

Abstract:Four notable emerging scientists discuss their work and the country's research scene. Four notable emerging scientists discuss their work and the country's research scene.

multidisciplinary sciences
What will it take to open South Korean research to the world?

Raphael Rashid

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-02685-y

IF: 64.8

2024-08-23

Nature

Abstract:Efforts to join the global ecosystem depend on greater diversity and a more open culture. Efforts to join the global ecosystem depend on greater diversity and a more open culture.

multidisciplinary sciences
Does South Korea have what it takes to become a leading space nation?

Raphael Rashid

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-03579-9

IF: 64.8

2024-11-24

Nature

Abstract:As the country forges global partnerships to boost its space ambitions, concerns mount over funding and private-sector support. As the country forges global partnerships to boost its space ambitions, concerns mount over funding and private-sector support.

multidisciplinary sciences
How South Korea can support female research leaders

Jung-Hye Roe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-02690-1

IF: 64.8

2024-08-23

Nature

Abstract:Inequitable access to research funding and leadership positions is holding back Korean science. Inequitable access to research funding and leadership positions is holding back Korean science.

multidisciplinary sciences
Reshuffling the global R&D deck, 1980-2050

Steven P Dehmer,Philip G Pardey,Jason M Beddow,Yuan Chai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213801

IF: 3.7

2019-03-29

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Based on more recent science spending developments in countries such as China, Korea, India and Brazil, there is a growing sense that the world's scientific deck of cards is in the midst of a major reshuffle. But it is not clear if this reordering is limited to just the top spenders, or, indeed, how these changes have been playing out over the longer term. The new, more comprehensive research and development (R&D) spending estimates presented and discussed here reveal that we are in the midst of a possibly game-changing, albeit partial and perhaps irregular, reshuffle of the global R&D deck. These changes have potentially profound domestic and international economic development implications over the medium to long term. Notably, the fortunes of many of the world's poorer countries continue to look bleak. Using the evolving structure of past R&D spending to project forward, and absent marked changes in science policies and spending priorities, we foresee a continuing and substantial shift in the geography of R&D towards parts of Asia, along with a continuing large, and in many respects growing, gap between the world's scientific haves and have-nots.
China’s New Leaders Must Keep Science in Focus

Gong, Peng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/491161a

IF: 64.8

2012-01-01

Nature

Abstract:By bringing in people with more varied backgrounds, China’s leadership change could benefit science, argues Peng Gong.
Reforming China's Science Awards.

Guoyou Qi,Xuemei Xie,Kevin Zhu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.351.6278.1161-a

2016-01-01

Abstract:Youyou Tu won the Nobel Prize, yet she failed to be nominated for China's own State Science and Technology (S&T) Awards. This has triggered a fierce debate on the S&T Award evaluation system in China. S&T awards are determined by bureaucrats and social circles (“guanxi”) ([ 1 ][1]). Because the system lacks transparency and allows no input from citizens or scientists, it is prone to opaque operations and influence by cronyism, favoritism, and bureaucracy. This has contaminated the science culture in China. Scientists feel obligated to develop “guanxi” networks instead of focusing on scientific discovery. A large portion of the country's science budget was estimated to have been wasted on networking dinners instead of invested in research labs ([ 1 ][1], [ 2 ][2]). Such priorities lead to scientific corruption and fraud ([ 3 ][3]). If nothing changes, talented scientists and scientific breakthroughs will continue to be suppressed. It is time for China to reform its S&T evaluation system. It should depend on merit, transparency, peer reviews, and objective measures. True participation by the science community should be institutionalized. The government should detach itself from the process. Decision-makers should consult with international academic circles and nongovernmental organizations. This new system is feasible with the availability of the Internet and social media. Making these changes will set an example for other countries that suffer from issues similar to China's. 1. [↵][4]1. Y. G. Shi, 2. Y. Rao , Science 329, 1128 (2010). [OpenUrl][5][Abstract/FREE Full Text][6] 2. [↵][7]1. Y. Xie, 2. C. Zhang, 3. Q. Lai , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 9437 (2014). [OpenUrl][8][Abstract/FREE Full Text][9] 3. [↵][10]1. C. Cao, 2. N. Li, 3. X. Li, 4. L. Liu , Science 341, 460 (2013). [OpenUrl][11][Abstract/FREE Full Text][12] [1]: #ref-1 [2]: #ref-2 [3]: #ref-3 [4]: #xref-ref-1-1 "View reference 1 in text" [5]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DScience%26rft.stitle%253DScience%26rft.aulast%253DShi%26rft.auinit1%253DY.%26rft.volume%253D329%26rft.issue%253D5996%26rft.spage%253D1128%26rft.epage%253D1128%26rft.atitle%253DChina%2527s%2BResearch%2BCulture%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1126%252Fscience.1196916%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F20813923%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [6]: /lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6Mzoic2NpIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEzOiIzMjkvNTk5Ni8xMTI4IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MjU6Ii9zY2kvMzUxLzYyNzgvMTE2MS4xLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ== [7]: #xref-ref-2-1 "View reference 2 in text" [8]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DProc.%2BNatl.%2BAcad.%2BSci.%2BU.S.A.%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1073%252Fpnas.1407709111%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F24979796%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [9]: /lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoicG5hcyI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMToiMTExLzI2Lzk0MzciO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyNToiL3NjaS8zNTEvNjI3OC8xMTYxLjEuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9 [10]: #xref-ref-3-1 "View reference 3 in text" [11]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DScience%26rft.stitle%253DScience%26rft.aulast%253DCao%26rft.auinit1%253DC.%26rft.volume%253D341%26rft.issue%253D6145%26rft.spage%253D460%26rft.epage%253D462%26rft.atitle%253DReforming%2BChina%2527s%2BS%2526T%2BSystem%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1126%252Fscience.1234206%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F23908209%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [12]: /lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6Mzoic2NpIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEyOiIzNDEvNjE0NS80NjAiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyNToiL3NjaS8zNTEvNjI3OC8xMTYxLjEuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9
A new vision for American science

Sudip S. Parikh,Marcia K. McNutt,Darío Gil

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adu7982

IF: 56.9

2024-11-30

Science

Abstract:America's scientific success is no accident. It has been powered by a decades-long commitment to federal investment in fundamental research that, in turn, nurtured both domestic and foreign talent and prompted the translation of breakthroughs to fuel the economy, improve health, fortify national security, and inspire awe. The world has benefited from the proliferation of this model, and partnerships between the US and other countries have resulted in game-changing discoveries, from medicines to machine learning. Yet what got America to this point will not get the country to where it needs to go. A new vision is required to respond to an evolving global science and technology ecosystem.

multidisciplinary sciences
Nature 's message to South Africa's next government: talk to your researchers

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-01516-4

IF: 64.8

2024-05-30

Nature

Abstract:The young nation faces some deep-rooted challenges. Solutions informed by science could make a difference. The young nation faces some deep-rooted challenges. Solutions informed by science could make a difference.

multidisciplinary sciences
Current Status of Korea's Industry–Academia Cooperation in Materials and Future Policy Directions

Sung Soo Kim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202204879

IF: 29.4

2022-10-05

Advanced Materials

Abstract:Industry–academia cooperative activities have decreased in South Korea, despite the government's expansion of R&D investment, presenting challenges as cutting‐edge technologies develop rapidly. A new policy of "3N", National Lab, National Facility, and National Research Team in the field of materials, has been launched recently, to enhance the cooperative networks. More diversity in activating the open innovation ecosystem is needed. The current status and policy directions of Republic of Korea's industry–academia cooperation in materials research are introduced. Industry–academia cooperation has various forms, such as contract research, joint research, technology transfer, technology assistance, as well as talent development between universities and industry. The actual characteristics of industry–academia cooperation are differentiated, depending on research models such as curiosity‐driven research, market‐driven research, and scenario‐driven research. In addition, there are diverse forms of cooperation, ranging from attaining one‐off cooperation goals, to implementing a series of cooperation, to forging sustainable partnership through sharing of values. The efforts and tasks supporting industry–academia cooperation, and the diverse industry–academia cooperative activities, are considered herein from the perspective of the Korean government's policy. Policy recommendations for the industry–academia cooperation, based on the current state and tasks of materials field, are also suggested.

materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry, physical,physics, applied, condensed matter,nanoscience & nanotechnology
Beyond Catch-Up: Could China Become the Global Innovation Powerhouse? China's Innovation Progress and Challenges from a Holistic Innovation Perspective

Jin Chen,Ximing Yin,Xiaolan Fu,Bruce McKern

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtab032

2021-01-01

Industrial and Corporate Change

Abstract:Over the past century and a half, global technological leadership has shifted from Europe to the United States, while scholars argue that the world has seen that it is now shifting from the United States to China due to China's extraordinary catch-up in the past four decades, in which the public policy-oriented national innovation system development plays a critical role that might provide an alternative way for innovation-driven development especially for emerging markets. Even though encountering many challenges ahead, China is positioning itself to take over the global innovation leadership in the next few decades. Here in this article, we introduce a serious yet underexplored question: could China go beyond catch-up and become the global innovation powerhouse? Specifically, drawing from the holistic innovation perspective, which is an original theoretical paradigm for the mission-oriented innovation policy change, this article critically reviews, both qualitatively and quantitatively, China's remarkable innovation progress and main drivers in comparison with G7 countries plus South Korea and India, trying to provide a comprehensive and critical view of state-of-the-art research on China's innovation catch-up. We further explore the five major challenges that China must take seriously when marching toward the global innovation powerhouse. Finally, we propose a mission-oriented holistic STI policy design framework for both China and other emerging economies to go beyond catch-up in a competitive dynamic world. This article provides a new and holistic perspective to access China's innovation progress and challenges, also generates novel insights for scholars and public agencies to contribute to global innovation development, with a shared goal of achieving global sustainable development in the post-COVID-19 pandemic world.
Opportunity from crisis: a common agenda for higher education and science, technology and innovation policy research

Merle Jacob,Tomas Hellström

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.949531

2014-09-14

Studies in Higher Education

Abstract:This paper makes a plea for the construction of a common agenda for higher education and science, technology and innovation (STI) policy research. The public higher education and research sector in all countries is currently in the grip of several challenges arising from increased accountability, internationalization and in some cases dwindling resources. Even as the sector is struggling to come to grips with these new developments, policy-makers the world over are being exhorted that their best route to sustainable economic development is investment in higher education and research. Scholars in STI policy and higher education research currently address these issues separately. This paper argues that a joint research effort from both these communities would push the research frontier further for each respective field and improve the evidence base for policy.

education & educational research
Current and Future Challenges of the Chinese Research System

Hugo Horta,Wenqin Shen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080x.2019.1632162

2019-01-01

Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management

Abstract:This paper assesses the evolution and current situation of the Chinese research system, mainly the academic research system from 1996 to 2017, using trend analysis and the revealed comparative advantage (RCA) index. Despite the impressive growth of China's knowledge capability, as measured by the number of publications in the international indexed literature over the past four decades, the country is still in a catching-up pattern with the world's most advanced research systems, instead of being a full-fledged scientific superpower. The analysis shows that China's publication growth has been to some extent inflated, as it was boosted by the inclusion of Chinese language journals in the international indexed literature. Therefore, this growth should be considered in a more moderate light. The competitiveness of China's disciplinary areas appears somewhat stalled when comparing the 1996-2000 and 2013-2017 periods, during which the same STEM-related disciplinary areas were the most competitive. This finding reveals not only a specialised knowledge structure, typical of catching-up countries, but also underperforming and neglected disciplinary areas in the social sciences, humanities and health sciences from a research funding standpoint. Based on this assessment, it is recommended that policymakers and university administrators change their focus from research quantity to research visibility by allocating funding in a less concentrated way to STEM fields, while promoting collaborative initiatives that can encourage the qualifications of academics and the visibility of the knowledge they produce.
Has Globalization Strengthened South Korea’s National Research System? National and International Dynamics of the Triple Helix of Scientific Co-Authorship Relationships in South Korea

Ki-Seok Kwon,Han Woo Park,Minho So,Loet Leydesdorff

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0512-9

IF: 3.801

2011-01-01

Scientometrics

Abstract:We trace the structural patterns of co-authorship between Korean researchers at three institutional types (university, government, and industry) and their international partners in terms of the mutual information generated in these relations. Data were collected from the Web of Science during the period 1968–2009. The traditional Triple-Helix indicator was modified to measure the evolving network of co-authorship relations. The results show that international co-authorship relations have varied considerably over time and with changes in government policies, but most relations have become stable since the early 2000s. In other words, the national publication system of Korea has gained some synergy from R&D internationalization during the 1990s, but the development seems to stagnate particularly at the national level: whereas both university and industrial collaborations are internationalized, the cross-connection within Korea has steadily eroded.
China's Drive for Innovation within a World of Profound Changes

Elsa B. Kania

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2021.0014

2021-01-01

Asia Policy

Abstract:executive summary: This essay examines China's drive for innovation as part of its national development strategy and addresses the tensions China faces between retaining control and autonomy in relevant sciences and technologies and becoming a global leader in these fields. main argument The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has assessed that the world is undergoing "profound changes unseen in a century" in part as a result of rapid advances in science and technology. The Covid-19 pandemic has heightened the impact of these changes and added to the disruption of the current global order. Such conditions present unique challenges and opportunities for China in the course of its national rejuvenation. Xi Jinping has accelerated the pursuit of China's rise as a great power, and the 14th Five-Year Plan highlights the country's capacity for innovation and to leverage science and technology in pursuit of that objective. Progress toward this goal, however, has been uneven. Although China aspires to be a new "high ground" in science and technology, the capacity for innovative Chinese technologies to go global may be undermined by a deficit of trust and transparency. If China does emerge as a leader in new frontiers of innovation in the course of the fourth industrial revolution, this shift could present significant implications for the future balance of power. policy implications • China's drive for innovation will continue to confront certain incongruities. While the CCP has prioritized innovation, the imperative of party control may undermine the necessary conditions for it. And while China has risen within and benefited from a world of open science, intense competition in the geopolitical environment is complicating that paradigm. • China and its technology companies have shown increasing technological prowess (e.g., in coping with the Covid-19 pandemic) but still face technical impediments to overcoming strangleholds in key areas, such as semiconductors, that act as chokepoints. • For the U.S. to sustain its traditional leadership in science and technology, it will need to revitalize and reinvest in innovation domestically.
Emerging challenges for science, technology and innovation policy research: A reflexive overview

Piera Morlacchi,Ben R. Martin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.021

IF: 7.2

2009-05-01

Research Policy

Abstract:This opening article in the special issue provides a reflexive overview of the nature and purpose of science, technology and innovation (STI) policy research at present, and makes a case for a collective and critical reflection on the means and ends of our research. The complex interaction between the past, present and future in the STI policy research field is one of the key themes of this article and of the special issue more generally. We first attempt to problematise what current STI policy research is, and then expand on the goals of the special issue. Besides summarising each article, we also discuss how these articles, individually and collectively, provide an overview of a number of epistemic, normative and practical challenges that confront us, articulating the main features of each of these. We end with a call for a sustained, critical and extensive ‘conversation’ among researchers in our field about the nature and purpose of STI policy research and the challenges we face.

management
Halt the Ongoing Decoupling and Reboot US-China Scientific Collaboration

Li Tang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2024.101521

IF: 3.7

2024-01-01

Journal of Informetrics

Abstract:This study reveals that, following bilateral reduced international visitation and academic exchange, Sino-American scientific collaboration is positioned at a turning point in a declining course. American international students originating from China have declined by nearly 22 %, and American students studying in China plummeted to 1.8 % of the number in 2018–2019. US-China interdependence in scientific collaboration has also reduced remarkably. At the same time, the concentration of influential research collaborated between the United States and China is consistently greater than both nations’ research outputs. Following the discussion of possible substitutes and the roles of American and Chinese researchers in global basic science and emerging issues, I argue that the two nations are so entwined in scientific collaboration that an adversarial rivalry perspective misses much of reality. In the face of rising uncertainties and global disasters, humanity does not have time to waste on nationalistic competitions. It is time for visionary leadership from both countries to promote intellectual exchange and scientific collaboration to address pressing global challenges.
Foresight: Turning Challenges into Opportunities

Leonid Gokhberg,Dirk Meissner,Alexander Sokolov

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25628-3_1

2016-01-01

Abstract:Foresight has gained much attention as a tool for developing and informing science, technology and innovation policy and company strategies. It is frequently used for detecting not only potential development paths of technologies but also possible economic and societal changes; and for identifying challenges that nations, societies and companies might face in the future. Raising awareness within the respective communities of trends and challenges is critically important—and the biggest challenge is how we can develop measures to meet these anticipated challenges. Paradoxically, perhaps, it may be more helpful for creating and implementing successful measures if these are elaborated by thinking about grasping opportunities, rather than framing them in terms of threats that have to be responded to. Accordingly there is a need to change the mindsets in science, technology and innovation policy making—and to engender solution and opportunity orientation among scientists and engineers.
Economic statecraft at the frontier: Korea’s drive for intelligent robotics

Elizabeth Thurbon,Linda Weiss

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1655084

IF: 4.1461

2019-09-12

Review of International Political Economy

Abstract:East Asian countries come most to mind when considering the role of governmental institutions in the contemporary economy. Specifically, it is widely assumed that the openness of economies, the maturation of companies, and their participation in global production chains have created extraordinary pressures that erode opportunities and incentives for government-business collaboration. We test this assumption in the South Korean context, with a focus on the case of robotics. This case is fruitful because it highlights the multiple challenges that face South Korean policymakers. These include the capacity to deliver cutting-edge technologies, to create new industry, to address potential downsides with novel solutions, and to engage the private sector in a relationship of 'governed interdependence'. In examining Korean strategies for grappling with the pressures they face, we seek to illuminate a pattern of state activity that existing concepts fail to capture. By refocusing the concept of geo-economic statecraft to encompass domestically deployed initiatives at the techno frontier, we intend to breach the impasse in the developmental/post developmental state debate and to open up a new research agenda. That agenda should probe the conditions that might motivate states to craft techno-economy building initiatives, and the relationships of governed interdependence which they must forge to achieve them.

economics,international relations,political science

Time to refocus for South Korean science

Can South Korea regain its edge in innovation?

How South Korea's science stars are finding success

What will it take to open South Korean research to the world?

Does South Korea have what it takes to become a leading space nation?

How South Korea can support female research leaders

Reshuffling the global R&D deck, 1980-2050

China’s New Leaders Must Keep Science in Focus

Reforming China's Science Awards.

A new vision for American science

Nature 's message to South Africa's next government: talk to your researchers

Current Status of Korea's Industry–Academia Cooperation in Materials and Future Policy Directions

Beyond Catch-Up: Could China Become the Global Innovation Powerhouse? China's Innovation Progress and Challenges from a Holistic Innovation Perspective

Opportunity from crisis: a common agenda for higher education and science, technology and innovation policy research

Current and Future Challenges of the Chinese Research System

Has Globalization Strengthened South Korea’s National Research System? National and International Dynamics of the Triple Helix of Scientific Co-Authorship Relationships in South Korea

China's Drive for Innovation within a World of Profound Changes

Emerging challenges for science, technology and innovation policy research: A reflexive overview

Halt the Ongoing Decoupling and Reboot US-China Scientific Collaboration

Foresight: Turning Challenges into Opportunities

Economic statecraft at the frontier: Korea’s drive for intelligent robotics