Abstract:Abstract To curtail the global warming increase to less than 2°C by 2050, the IPCC highlights Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage (CCUS) as a vital approach. TotalEnergies, following its ambition to become a responsible energy major, invests 10% of its R&D budget in CCUS to reduce the global process cost and help decarbonize our activities. TotalEnergies is both working to decarbonize its own assets and developing a transport and storage infrastructure in Europe, with notably Northern Lights an example of note. It is equally of interest how this transport/storage infrastructure can be of use for other sectors and as such how various full CCUS chains may emerge. This explains the interest to develop techno-economic tools to evaluate CO2 capture processes applied to a wide range of industries. CO2 that is an integral part of the manufacturing process, is particularly difficult to abate in any future scenario, and one particular industry, which is facing such a challenge is the cement sector. CCUS has been identified as a potential solution to help with this issue. The present paper outlines the outcomes of a techno-economic study evaluating CO2 capture technologies based on cement factory retrofitting. A literature review aimed at identifying the main characteristics of a typical European cement plant (capacity, process mode, pollutant composition in the flue gas...) was carried out. In this paper, a base case scenario of 90% absorption-based CO2 capture with monoethanolamine (MEA) is compared with four alternative CO2 capture approaches: –An absorption technology based on non-amine solvent.–An adsorption technology based on a Concentration Swing Adsorption process.–An oxyfuel technology derived from the R&D works performed during the CEMCAP project (European CO2 capture project).–A Calcium Looping technology with tail-end process configuration. For each of these approaches, the whole carbon capture chain has been considered: this includes flue gas pretreatment, CO2 conditioning (including compression), steam generation, and utilities. Using process simulations, engineering studies have been carried out and have provided Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) such as Capital Costs, Operation Costs and Global Warming Potential (primary energy consumption per ton of CO2 avoided). It enabled mapping the technologies with regards to the cost and volume of CO2 avoided, as well as providing for each of the technologies the break-even point for an eventual CO2 tax. Based on these KPIs, several facts have been highlighted: –The need to consider the whole process (including utilities, compression...) and not only the capture unit.–The development of new materials for adsorption and contactor design is already driving down costs.–The availability of waste heat can be a game-changer to implement a CO2 capture technology.–Technology comparisons are location and site-specific and cannot be taken as a basis for concept selection. TotalEnergies approach to CCUS is collaborative. With these full-scale techno-economical assessments, generated via quotations from industrial equipment providers and using Engineering, Procurement and Construction standards, this not only gives a basis for comparison, but also assists our discussions with partners to identify key technological development pathways.

Integrated Carbon Capture and Utilization in the Cement Industry: A Comparative Study

A Fair Comparison Between Five Co2 Capture Technologies

Environmental impact assessment of post-combustion CO2 capture technologies applied to cement production plants

Techno-economic Analysis of Integrated Carbon Capture and Utilisation Compared with Carbon Capture and Utilisation with Syngas Production

Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Integration of Cement Plants, Power Plants, and CO2 Capture Systems

Technoeconomic Feasibility Study of Cement Plants As Reference Facilities for Centralized CO2 Capture in Industrial Sites

Potential application of cement kiln dust in carbon capture, utilisation, and storage technology

The Carbon-Energy-water Nexus of the Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage Technology Deployment Schemes: A Case Study in China's Cement Industry

Evaluating the Carbon Footprint of Cement Plants Integrated With the Calcium Looping CO2 Capture Process

Techno-economic Analysis on CO2 Mitigation by Integrated Carbon Capture and Methanation

Techno-economic assessment of an industrial carbon capture hub sharing a cement rotary kiln as sorbent regenerator

The Role of Low-Carbon Fuels and Carbon Capture in Decarbonizing the U.S. Clinker Manufacturing for Cement Production: CO2 Emissions Reduction Potentials

[Assessment of Emission Reduction Potential of CO2 Capture, Geological Utilization, and Storage in Cement Industry of China]

LCA and negative emission potential of retrofitted cement plants under oxyfuel conditions at high biogenic fuel shares

CCUS Scenarios for the Cement Industry: Is CO2 Utilization Feasible?

Process Design and Techno-ECONOMIC Evaluation of a Decarbonized Cement Production Process Using Carbon Capture and Utilization

Coupled Oxygen-Enriched Combustion in Cement Industry CO2 Capture System: Process Modeling and Exergy Analysis

Conceptual Design and Life-Cycle Environmental and Economic Assessment of Low-Carbon Cement Manufacturing Processes

The integrated approach of carbon capture, utilization, and storage via CO 2 mineralization for the removal of fly ash, bottom ash, and exhaust gas―A case study of circulating fluidized bed combustion

Techno-economic Analysis of Carbon Capture and Utilization Technologies and Implications for China

CO2 mineralization of demolished concrete wastes into a supplementary cementitious material – a new CCU approach for the cement industry