Abstract:Abstract To curtail the global warming increase to less than 2°C by 2050, the IPCC highlights Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage (CCUS) as a vital approach. TotalEnergies, following its ambition to become a responsible energy major, invests 10% of its R&D budget in CCUS to reduce the global process cost and help decarbonize our activities. TotalEnergies is both working to decarbonize its own assets and developing a transport and storage infrastructure in Europe, with notably Northern Lights an example of note. It is equally of interest how this transport/storage infrastructure can be of use for other sectors and as such how various full CCUS chains may emerge. This explains the interest to develop techno-economic tools to evaluate CO2 capture processes applied to a wide range of industries. CO2 that is an integral part of the manufacturing process, is particularly difficult to abate in any future scenario, and one particular industry, which is facing such a challenge is the cement sector. CCUS has been identified as a potential solution to help with this issue. The present paper outlines the outcomes of a techno-economic study evaluating CO2 capture technologies based on cement factory retrofitting. A literature review aimed at identifying the main characteristics of a typical European cement plant (capacity, process mode, pollutant composition in the flue gas...) was carried out. In this paper, a base case scenario of 90% absorption-based CO2 capture with monoethanolamine (MEA) is compared with four alternative CO2 capture approaches: –An absorption technology based on non-amine solvent.–An adsorption technology based on a Concentration Swing Adsorption process.–An oxyfuel technology derived from the R&D works performed during the CEMCAP project (European CO2 capture project).–A Calcium Looping technology with tail-end process configuration. For each of these approaches, the whole carbon capture chain has been considered: this includes flue gas pretreatment, CO2 conditioning (including compression), steam generation, and utilities. Using process simulations, engineering studies have been carried out and have provided Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) such as Capital Costs, Operation Costs and Global Warming Potential (primary energy consumption per ton of CO2 avoided). It enabled mapping the technologies with regards to the cost and volume of CO2 avoided, as well as providing for each of the technologies the break-even point for an eventual CO2 tax. Based on these KPIs, several facts have been highlighted: –The need to consider the whole process (including utilities, compression...) and not only the capture unit.–The development of new materials for adsorption and contactor design is already driving down costs.–The availability of waste heat can be a game-changer to implement a CO2 capture technology.–Technology comparisons are location and site-specific and cannot be taken as a basis for concept selection. TotalEnergies approach to CCUS is collaborative. With these full-scale techno-economical assessments, generated via quotations from industrial equipment providers and using Engineering, Procurement and Construction standards, this not only gives a basis for comparison, but also assists our discussions with partners to identify key technological development pathways.

The integrated approach of carbon capture, utilization, and storage via CO 2 mineralization for the removal of fly ash, bottom ash, and exhaust gas―A case study of circulating fluidized bed combustion

A Comprehensive Review of CO2 Mineral Sequestration Methods Using Coal Fly Ash for Carbon Capture, Utilisation, and Storage (CCUS) Technology

Coal fly ash and bottom ash low-cost feedstocks for CO2 reduction using the adsorption and catalysis processes

A Review on CO2 Sequestration via Mineralization of Coal Fly Ash

[Research Progress on CO2 Capture, Utilization, and Storage of Fly Ash].

Accelerated CO 2 mineralization technology using fly ash as raw material: Recent research advances

Utilization of Cow Bone Waste and Calcium Oxide for the Solidification and Stabilization of MSWI Fly Ash: Towards Sustainable Practices

Increased Sustainability of Carbon Dioxide Mineral Sequestration by a Technology Involving Fly Ash Stabilization

CCUS-assisted electricity-chemical polygeneration system for decarburizing coal-fired power plant: Process integration and performance assessment

Direct and continuous conversion of flue gas CO2 into green fuels using dual function materials in a circulating fluidized bed system

Life cycle assessment of post-combustion carbon capture and storage for the ultra-supercritical pulverized coal power plant

A new strategy for CO 2 storage and Al 2 O 3 recovery from blast furnace slag and coal fly ash by employing vacuum reduction and alkali dissolution methods

A Green and Multi-Win Strategy for Coal Fly Ash Disposal by CO2 Fixation and Mesoporous Silica Synthesis.

Advanced Mineral Carbonation: An Approach to Accelerate CO2 Sequestration Using Steel Production Wastes and Integrated Fluidized Bed Reactor

Integrated Carbon Capture and Utilization in the Cement Industry: A Comparative Study

Towards sustainable coal industry: Turning coal bottom ash into wealth

Optimum operation condition of fluidized-bed homogeneous crystallization technology for the recovery of carbon dioxide captured in flue gas

Parametric Study on Co-Feeding of Municipal Solid Waste and Coal in an IGCC Power Plant with Pre-Combustion Carbon Capture

Utilization of circulating fluidized bed coal ash in autoclaved aerated concrete manufacture by mineral carbonation

Characteristics of Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustion (CFBC) Ash as Carbon Dioxide Storage Medium and Development of Construction Materials by Recycling Carbonated Ash

A Fair Comparison Between Five Co2 Capture Technologies