Honey, We Shrunk Our Impact: Social Impact in Organizational Research

Gavin M. Schwarz,Dave Bouckenooghe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00218863231223870

2024-02-11

The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science

Abstract:The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Volume 60, Issue 1, Page 5-18, March 2024.

psychology, applied,management

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Show Me the Impact: Communicating “behavioral Impact Message” to Promote Pro-Environmental Consumer Behavior

Xushan Sheng,Xiaoling Zhang,Xinyue Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.12.012

IF: 8.921

2023-01-01

Sustainable Production and Consumption

Abstract:Showing the impact of pro-environmental behavior is crucial to its adoption. In this paper, we introduce behavioral impact messages, which attempt to persuade people by displaying behavioral consequences. Applications of the concept of impact messages have been extensively covered in the literature, such as in goal framing and the provision of efficacy information. However, there has been no integrative analysis of this basic message pattern. In this regard, an integrated conceptual framework is proposed to uncover the behavioral impact message persuasion process. First, three elements of behavioral impact messages and their variations are identified: the behavioral agent, the intended behavior and its impact. Specifically, we address the contrasts of individual-collective referencing or consumer-company referencing in the ‘agent’ domain, varied options of the ‘behavior,’ and different targets, scopes, and levels of tangibility concerning the ‘impact.’ Second, the combined message strategies are recognized, including gain-and-loss framing, normative strategy, and emotion strategy. Third, a theoretical model is further proposed to reveal how behavioral impact messages and their variations influence pro-environmental consumer behavior adoption through five themes of mechanisms (i.e., knowledge and awareness, personal relevance, efficacy beliefs, attitudes, and emotions). In particular, showing ‘impact’ is important due to its capacity to assist mental simulation of likely future outcomes of the present behavior, prime various motives that direct behavior, and potentially cultivate beliefs about behavioral effectiveness. In addition, the emerging investigation of ‘individual consumers’ in behavioral impact communication may reap the advantages of self-referencing, although susceptible to backfire effects through reactance and moral licensing. Finally, it is recommended that future works of behavioral impact message research should be investigated to address the updated communication context, consider receiver characteristics, and explore long-term exposure effects. Hence, practitioners may optimize messaging interventions by valuing consumers' impacts, expanding behavior options, including multiple impact indicators, fitting online or offline settings, increasing impact visuality and interactivity, and also explore extra effects of behavioral impact exposure on well-being.
Imagine moving behavioral science findings languishing in scholarly journals to public consumption

Gary P. Latham,Alex Alonso

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866231225086

2024-06-09

Organizational Psychology Review

Abstract:Organizational Psychology Review, Volume 14, Issue 2, Page 360-369, May 2024. Where has our reach and impact gone? As behavioral scientists, it is incumbent upon us to extend the reach of our work. Doing so is never easy unless you follow a few approaches. This manuscript underscores the imperative for behavioral scientists to communicate their research findings beyond traditional academic confines, targeting non-scientific audiences. We outline strategic steps that scholars can adopt to enhance the visibility, accessibility, and impact of their research. These include (1) translating scientific jargon into comprehensible language; (2) leveraging digital platforms like blogs, podcasts, and social media; (3) collaborating with media professionals for broader outreach; (4) engaging in public talks and community forums; and (5) developing buy-in from the audiences needed for organizational success. Implementing these strategies not only reinforces the societal relevance of social behavioral science, but also fosters a more informed and engaged public, bridging the gap between academia and the broader community.Plain language summary (latham & alonso)Too often behavioral scientists find themselves languishing in navel-gazing postures because of our incentivization systems. We, behavioral scientists, are rewarded for publishing in peer-reviewed journals where we communicate with one another in the most abstruse jargon imaginable. It comes as no surprise then that we seldom find ourselves translating theory into applied work and, even more seldom, making an impact on real-world problems.While we find ourselves in low-impact, high navel-gazing situations often, there are several things we can do to take application to theory and, vice versa, enhance theory into applied settings. Throughout this manuscript, Latham and Alonso provide a thorough examination of how behavioral scientists can develop partnerships with stakeholder groups. Further, they examine how learning programs can adapt to build partnership skillsets among behavioral scientists. Finally, they apply their findings to an example involving the application of theory around interactive justice.

psychology, applied,management
The measurement of social impact and opportunities for research in business administration

Sergio G. Lazzarini

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rauspm.2017.12.010

2018-01-01

RAUSP Management Journal

Abstract:In the last decades, management scholars have examined ways through which firms can build profitable operations while at the same time addressing pressing social and environmental concerns. But how can organizations ascertain whether their isolated or collaborative efforts are truly generating positive impact to their target populations? Measuring real impact requires addressing several issues related to causality, comparability, and cost (given that most methods require customized data collection and analysis). In this article, I briefly discuss alternative methods to assess impact and then suggest novel research avenues to inform the debate on how to measure impact and how impact measurement practices can help organizations blend social and economic goals.

English Else
Citizenship Behavior: Different Theoretical Perspectives to Understand the Predictors and Outcomes

Peter Bamberger,Patrick Flynn,Russell Eric Johnson,Szu-Han Lin,Yiduo Shao,I-Heng Wu,Bruce Avolio,Amrou Awaysheh,Chu-Hsiang Chang,Aaron Hill,Hun Whee Lee,Emily Poulton,Junqi Shi,Tara S. Wernsing,Mengjie Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2019.11768symposium

2019-01-01

Abstract:This symposium presents cutting-edge research on citizenship behavior. The existing literature has suggested that citizenship behavior is an important and complicated phenomenon that is not fully understood. To reconcile the conflicting views in on-going investigations of this phenomenon, this symposium presents five studies that examine how employees at different organizational levels perceive citizenship behavior and how they enact and react to such behavior. Drawing from multiple theoretical perspectives, these studies advance our understanding regarding the various motives for citizenship behavior and the outcomes of such behavior for the actor, the team, and the organization. Peter Bamberger, who has made a foundational contribution to the workplace helping literature and is currently the Editor-in-Chief of Academy of Management Discoveries, will comment on the papers and facilitate an interactive discussion with the audience. Opening Up the Black Box Between CEO Self-Esteem and Firm Performance: The Mediation Role of CEO Helping and TMT Managerial Consensus Presenter: Yiduo Shao; U. of Florida Presenter: Yifan Song; Temple U. Presenter: Jaclyn Koopmann; Auburn U. Presenter: Aaron Hill; U. of Florida Presenter: Junqi Shi; Lingnan U. / Sun Yat-sen U. The Top of the Top: Psychological Entitlement as a Mediator in Explaining High Performers' Social Behavioral Outcomes Presenter: I-Heng Wu; U. of Iowa Presenter: Min-Hsuan Tu; U. of Florida The Dark and Bright Sides of Empathic Concern: A Conservation of Resources Perspective Presenter: Szu-Han Lin; U. of Massachusetts, Amherst Presenter: Emily Poulton; U. of Massachusetts, Amherst Presenter: Mengjie Xu; U. of Massachusetts, Amherst Presenter: Min-Hsuan Tu; U. of Florida Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Its Implications for Moral Licensing Presenter: Russell Eric Johnson; Eli Broad School of Business, Michigan State U. Presenter: Hun Whee Lee; Michigan State U. Presenter: Chu-Hsiang Chang; Michigan State U. The Effects of Authentic Leadership on Sustainability Presenter: Tara S. Wernsing; IE Business School Presenter: Amrou Awaysheh; Indiana U. - Kelley School of Business Presenter: Patrick Flynn; North Carolina State U. Presenter: Bruce Avolio; U. of Washington
How to demonstrate the real-world impact of your research

Martha Newson,Sadie Watson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-03059-0

IF: 64.8

2024-10-31

Nature

Abstract:Nature, Published online: 30 October 2024; doi:10.1038/d41586-024-03059-0 Influencing policymakers might not feel like part of a researcher's role. But it should be, argue Martha Newson and Sadie Watson.

multidisciplinary sciences
The impact factor of engaged research: Metrics for conservation outcomes

Simon Lhoest,Candice Carr Kelman,Chris J. Barton,Jessica A. Beaudette,Leah R. Gerber

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110534

IF: 7.499

2024-03-07

Biological Conservation

Abstract:Will this paper lead to any measurable impact on biodiversity conservation? In this essay, we examine the relevance of scientific publications for conservation outcomes and propose specific recommendations to encourage procedural reforms in academia. While many conservation scientists dedicate significant effort to making their research accessible and actionable for conservation outcomes, academia often doesn't reward these efforts and can even inhibit them. Universities increasingly promote engaged scholarship, yet few institutions have established formal mechanisms that promote and reward such work. We suggest a new framework to support engaged universities and propose three recommendations for research institutions. Our recommendations are based on 71 interviews of conservation scientists producing actionable science. We recommend that universities: (1) actively support faculty engagement in boundary-spanning work, providing an interface between research and society; (2) meaningfully reward faculty work that makes a genuine impact on efforts to solve real-world problems, beyond academic publications; and (3) use appropriate metrics to recognize the value of impacts on society and contributions to practical conservation outcomes. Universities supporting engaged scholarship have the potential to excel in attracting talented scholars, securing funding, and fostering impactful change.

environmental sciences,biodiversity conservation,ecology
The Impact of Social Media on Political Activism

Divine Keith

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47941/ijhss.1429

2023-09-11

International Journal of Humanity and Social Sciences

Abstract:Purpose: The main objective of this study was to investigate the impact of social media usage on political activism. Methodology: The study adopted a desktop methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. Findings: The findings revealed that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the impact of social media on political activism. The empirical review revealed that social media amplifies the speed and reach of activism efforts. The instantaneous dissemination of information, real-time communication, and dynamic organization have all been instrumental in enabling activists to orchestrate protests, raise awareness, and mobilize support for critical issues. It is worth noting that the effectiveness of social media in driving political change is contingent on the strategic alignment of online campaigns with offline actions. Successful movements have demonstrated the power of synergizing digital advocacy with physical participation, demonstrating that online platforms serve as a means to an end, rather than the end itself. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Social Movement theory, Network theory and the Agenda- Setting theory may be used to anchor future studies on the impact of social media on political activism. The study therefore recommends for diversifying content exposure, enhanced media literacy, bridging online-offline engagement and promotion of responsible platform use among others.
Delivering impact via the ebb-and-flow of a research team: Reflection on a long-term program of research into a global societal challenge*

Rebecca Bednarek,Eugenia Cacciatori,Konstantinos Chalkias,Rhianna Gallagher Rodgers,Paula Jarzabkowski,Mustafa Kavas,Elisabeth Krull

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00218863231207873

2023-10-28

The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science

Abstract:The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Ahead of Print. In this paper, we draw insights from a 15-year qualitative research program exploring catastrophe insurance and gaps in insurance protection as risks escalate within a world impacted by a climate emergency. We suggest that the ebb-and-flow of our research team's composition and activities through time was inextricably linked with our ability to have a sustained impact on such a large-scale societal issue. The essay situates itself within the research impact and team literature, narrates the trajectory of our research program and team development, and develops a framework for effectively managing impact-oriented qualitative research teams over time. Our framework illustrates key aspects of this process including team (re)forming, building team and individual stickability, performing, and managing team flux. We also present 10 practical takeaways for how these aspects can be managed effectively to produce long-term impact work to address grand challenges.

psychology, applied,management
Evidence-based research impact praxis: Integrating scholarship and practice to ensure research benefits society

Eric A Jensen,Mark Reed,Aaron M Jensen,Alexander Gerber

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.14205.2

2023-08-04

Abstract:Effective research impact development is essential to address global challenges. This commentary highlights key issues facing research impact development as a nascent professional field of practice. We argue that those working on research impact should take a strategic, 'evidence-based' approach to maximize potential research benefits and minimize potential harms. We identify key features of evidence-based good practice in the context of research impact work. This includes integrating relevant research and theory into professional decision-making, drawing on a diversity of academic disciplines offering pertinent insights. Such an integration of scholarship and practice will improve the capacity of research impact work to make a positive difference for society. Moving the focus of research impact work to earlier stages in the research and innovation process through stakeholder engagement and anticipatory research can also boost its effectiveness. The research impact evidence base should be combined with the right kind of professional capacities and practical experience to enhance positive impact. Such capacities need to be developed through relevant education and training, for example, in participatory methods and social inclusion. Such training for research impact work needs to forge strong links between research impact scholarship and practice. Finally, there is a need for improvements in the evidence base for research impact to make it more practically useful.
The Importance of Documenting the Impacts of Health Communication

Andy J. King

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2416013

IF: 3.501

2024-10-17

Health Communication

Abstract:No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s). 1. One important distinction we had to explain to authors was differentiating between the impact of a communication effort within a study and the impact of that study outside of academic contexts. Others have written about this as well (e.g., Smith, Citation 2018 ), noting as an example that a randomized controlled trial can have an impact on health outcomes but the impact of that research beyond the trial would likely be what most considered "impact." Also, unlike in the 100 th issue forum, which included impact ON health communication research, we tried to focus primarily impact beyond the original or initial research studies. 2. Two other important considerations. First, who documents impact is not specified because I am not sure it matters. You can document others' impact as well or better than you can document your own. Community partners are well situated to document impact in ways researchers might have a hard time writing up in a way that resonates with stakeholders. Second, defining "original research context" is also a challenge – but scholars should document impact more often than not and worry about the utility or quality of those documented impacts over time. For example, outside of the original research context could be a research context in another field. 3. This categorization is reasonable but completely subjective and ignores nuance and overlap of the many impressive activities reported. Still, such categorization streamlines the discussion of trends and observations across essays. 4. This conclusion mirrors that of the editors in their reply to the essays in the 100 th issue of the journal (Thompson et al., Citation 2010 ). In almost 15 years, due undoubtedly in the need for researchers to document their individual impact on the field rather than their impact beyond the field, the documentation of impact of research outside of the immediate research context has changed little among health communication researchers. In that commentary, the authors note the need to reframe what one considers scholarly activity to truly allow for more efforts to have an impact beyond one's own research – an important and thoughtful comment that unfortunately seems to be mostly a priority in writing rather than in practice for most scholars. 5. This concern is not unlike critiques of research studies where some theory/model is mostly unsupported by results, but authors suggest in the discussion that the important results are what supported the theory/model.

health policy & services,communication
Open Science and Reform Practices in Organizational Behavior Research over Time (2011 to 2019)

Elizabeth R. Tenney,Elaine Costa,Aurélien Allard,Simine Vazire

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vr7f9

2020-10-20

Abstract:The “credibility revolution” has fueled a number of initiatives to help bring scientific practices more in line with scientific ideals. These initiatives include increasing the sample size of studies, making data and materials publicly available, pre-registering data collection and analysis plans, publishing replication attempts, and publishing null results. To what extent have these practices become the norm in quantitative Organizational Behavior research? In the current study, using computer algorithms and human coders, we coded the reported use of several open science and reform practices in articles published in four prominent journals (Academy of Management Journal; Journal of Applied Psychology; Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes; and Organization Science) from 2011 through 2019. We found that although the vast majority of articles did not use any open science practices, some practices we coded were on the rise, especially in the last two to three years. While there is much room for improvement, these results suggest the field could be on the brink of important and sustained change.
The Measurement and Communication of Effect Sizes in Management Research

Carl F. Fey,Tianyou Hu,Andrew Delios

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2022.2

IF: 3.776

2022-04-21

Management and Organization Review

Abstract:Abstract The measurement and communication of the effect size of an independent variable on a dependent variable is critical to effective statistical analysis in the Social Sciences. We develop ideas about how to extend traditional methods of evaluating relationships in multivariate models to explain and illustrate the statistical power of a focal independent variable. Even with a growing acceptance of the need to report effect sizes, scholars in the management community have few well-established protocols or guidelines for reporting effect sizes. In this editorial essay, we: (1) review the necessity of reporting effect sizes; (2) discuss commonly used measures of effect size and accepted cut-offs for large, medium, and small effect sizes; (3) recommend standards for reporting effect sizes via verbal descriptions and graphical presentations; and (4) present best practice examples of reporting and discussing effect size. In summary, we provide guidance for authors on how to report and interpret effect sizes, advocating for rigor and completeness in statistical analysis.

management
A measure for the impact of research

Alejandro M. Aragón

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1302.7274

2013-04-12

Abstract:The last few years have seen the proliferation of measures that quantify the scientific output of researches. Yet, these measures focus on productivity, thus fostering the "publish or perish" paradigm. This article proposes a measure that aims at quantifying the impact of research de-emphasizing productivity, thus providing scientists an alternative, conceivably fairer, evaluation of their work. Emphasis is placed on the scientist rather than on quantities that can grow unbounded. The measure, defined initially for manuscripts, is then extended to researchers and institutions.

Digital Libraries
Publication Bias in the Organizational Sciences

Sven Kepes,George C. Banks,Michael McDaniel,Deborah L. Whetzel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452760

IF: 8.247

2012-07-31

Organizational Research Methods

Abstract:Publication bias poses multiple threats to the accuracy of meta-analytically derived effect sizes and related statistics. Unfortunately, a review of the literature indicates that unlike meta-analytic reviews in medicine, research in the organizational sciences tends to pay little attention to this issue. In this article, the authors introduce advances in meta-analytic techniques from the medical and related sciences for a comprehensive assessment and evaluation of publication bias. The authors illustrate their use on a data set on employment interview validities. Using multiple methods, including contour-enhanced funnel plots, trim and fill, Egger’s test of the intercept, Begg and Mazumdar’s rank correlation, meta-regression, cumulative meta-analysis, and selection models, the authors find limited evidence of publication bias in the studied data.

management,psychology, applied
Research methodology on pursuing impact driven research

Tao Xie

2019-01-01

Abstract:“Because anybody who thinks that we’re just here because we’re smart forgets that we’re also privileged, and we have to extend that farther. So we’ve got to educate and help every generation and we all have to keep it up in lots of ways.”–David Notkin, 1955-2013
Towards a Better Understanding of Online Influence: Differences in Twitter CommunicationBetween Companies and Influencers

Diana C. Hernandez-Bocanegra,Angela Borchert,Felix Brünker,Gautam Kishore Shahi,Björn Ross

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.07986

2022-02-16

Social and Information Networks

Abstract:In the last decade, Social Media platforms such as Twitter have gained importance in the various marketing strategies of companies. This work aims to examine the presence of influential content on a textual level, by investigating characteristics of tweets in the context of social impact theory, and its dimension immediacy. To this end, we analysed influential Twitter communication data during Black Friday 2018 with methods from social media analytics such as sentiment analysis and degree centrality. Results show significant differences in communication style between companies and influencers. Companies published longer textual content and created more tweets with a positive sentiment and more first-person pronouns than influencers. These findings shall serve as a basis for a future experimental study to examine the impact of text presence on consumer cognition and the willingness to purchase.
Proenvironmental behaviour spillover

Sandra J. Geiger

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00043-1

2022-03-09

Nature Reviews Psychology

Abstract:Nature Reviews Psychology, Published online: 09 March 2022; doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00043-1In this Journal Club, Sandra Geiger describes a meta-analysis of intervention studies on spillover effects in environmental decisions.
Deep Impact: A Study on the Impact of Data Papers and Datasets in the Humanities and Social Sciences

Barbara McGillivray,Paola Marongiu,Nilo Pedrazzini,Marton Ribary,Mandy Wigdorowitz,Eleonora Zordan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/publications10040039

2022-10-16

Publications

Abstract:The humanities and social sciences (HSS) have recently witnessed an exponential growth in data-driven research. In response, attention has been afforded to datasets and accompanying data papers as outputs of the research and dissemination ecosystem. In 2015, two data journals dedicated to HSS disciplines appeared in this landscape: Journal of Open Humanities Data (JOHD) and Research Data Journal for the Humanities and Social Sciences (RDJ). In this paper, we analyse the state of the art in the landscape of data journals in HSS using JOHD and RDJ as exemplars by measuring performance and the deep impact of data-driven projects, including metrics (citation count; Altmetrics, views, downloads, tweets) of data papers in relation to associated research papers and the reuse of associated datasets. Our findings indicate: that data papers are published following the deposit of datasets in a repository and usually following research articles; that data papers have a positive impact on both the metrics of research papers associated with them and on data reuse; and that Twitter hashtags targeted at specific research campaigns can lead to increases in data papers' views and downloads. HSS data papers improve the visibility of datasets they describe, support accompanying research articles, and add to transparency and the open research agenda.
Some recommendations for doing high‐impact research in social psychological science

Sander Linden

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12463

2021-02-01

Asian Journal Of Social Psychology

Abstract:<p>In this article, I reflect upon my own career to distil some general recommendations for doing high‐impact social psychological research in the midst of a worldwide pandemic. My suggestions include (a) testing and deriving theories that can help explain real‐world human judgment and behaviour (answering questions that people care about), (b) preaching beyond the choir (communicating your research to audiences outside of social psychology), and (c) birds of a feather are stronger together (maximizing impact through strategic collaborations).</p>

psychology, social
Organizational Behavior in Small and Medium Enterprises: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda

Shesira Belén Mamani-Ildefonso,Vanessa Noemi Quispe-Martinez,Franklin Cordova-Buiza,Gisela Analy Fernandez-Hurtado

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34190/ecmlg.19.1.1930

2023-11-13

Abstract:The main objective of the research is to determine the impact of organizational behavior among small and medium-sized companies in the scientific literature between 2012 and 2022. The Prisma 2020 methodology (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta - Analyses) was used for the processing of data obtained in the collection of articles supported by databases such as: Redalyc, Scopus, Dialnet and Scielo from which a total of 18 articles related to the study variable were obtained, 90% of them coming from Latin America, occupying the first place Colombia followed by Ecuador, all in Spanish language; on the other hand, the sectors and items that were used for the studies were 30% private and industrial educational sector. For the analysis of relevant information and keywords on the variable, ATLAS ti.22 was used, which allows identifying the concepts and topics with greater mention and relevance, among them: the authors indicate that the study of organizational behavior allows predicting the behavior of people within companies; it also helps to find the best work structure, identifies people's skills and improves the flow of horizontal and vertical communication; at the same time, it is the most complex to develop because each person is considered a genuine and unique link, which have different criteria, thoughts and points of view. In conclusion, it is argued that in order to maintain a good working environment within the company where effective labor relations based on ethical and moral values are fostered or executed, the full understanding and management of behaviors and attitudes among the members of the organization must be prioritized; only in this way will there be a satisfactory impact on the performance of the collaborators. This research will allow future researchers to link organizational culture with the performance and loyalty of their collaborators, prioritizing policies and norms that sustain harmony and efficiency in a company.

Honey, We Shrunk Our Impact: Social Impact in Organizational Research

Show Me the Impact: Communicating “behavioral Impact Message” to Promote Pro-Environmental Consumer Behavior

Imagine moving behavioral science findings languishing in scholarly journals to public consumption

The measurement of social impact and opportunities for research in business administration

Citizenship Behavior: Different Theoretical Perspectives to Understand the Predictors and Outcomes

How to demonstrate the real-world impact of your research

The impact factor of engaged research: Metrics for conservation outcomes

The Impact of Social Media on Political Activism

Delivering impact via the ebb-and-flow of a research team: Reflection on a long-term program of research into a global societal challenge*

Evidence-based research impact praxis: Integrating scholarship and practice to ensure research benefits society

The Importance of Documenting the Impacts of Health Communication

Open Science and Reform Practices in Organizational Behavior Research over Time (2011 to 2019)

The Measurement and Communication of Effect Sizes in Management Research

A measure for the impact of research

Publication Bias in the Organizational Sciences

Research methodology on pursuing impact driven research

Towards a Better Understanding of Online Influence: Differences in Twitter CommunicationBetween Companies and Influencers

Proenvironmental behaviour spillover

Deep Impact: A Study on the Impact of Data Papers and Datasets in the Humanities and Social Sciences

Some recommendations for doing high‐impact research in social psychological science

Organizational Behavior in Small and Medium Enterprises: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda