Abstract:With the disruption of nonessential research due to the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers faced unexpected changes in their work and personal life. We assessed what challenges researchers encountered during lockdown and whether gender, career level, discipline, and job-permanency influenced their experiences (negative and positive), thereby collecting empirical material which could provide valuable information for future mentoring/supporting practices. Data were collected between July-August 2020 via an online-survey, and answers from 210 respondents (78% female, 21% male, 1% non-disclosed gender) working in Animal Behaviour and Welfare (ABW, 57%), other biological sciences (37%) or social sciences (6%) were analysed. Respondents were post-graduate students (35%), research associates (35%), and professors (22%) or classified as 'other' (8%), and overall fixed-term (55%) and permanent (45%) jobholders. We expected that early career researchers, non-permanent jobholders, and female respondents would report more challenges/less positive experiences during lockdown. Due to the widespread impact of the pandemic, we predicted no effect of academic disciplines. We found great inter-individual difference in the experiences reported by the respondents, with some reporting adaptation to a new routine within a week (31% of the respondents) and/or greater efficiency working from home (19%) while others felt less efficient working from home and/or experienced a greater imbalance towards work (30%) and/or increased personal responsibilities (24%). The most commonly reported challenges were the lack of informal contact with colleagues (63%), a loss of focus due to worry or stress (53%) and/or unsuitable working environments (47%). Postgraduate students, research associates, non-permanent jobholders and ABW researchers reported more work-related challenges (p = from 0.03 to <0.0001) and were more likely to worry about the future (p = from 0.0002 to <0.0001) than other career levels, permanent jobholders, and researchers from other disciplines respectively. We found no gender effect (p = from 0.006 [NS due to Benjamini-Liu correction for multiple comparisons, 24 metrics tested] to 1.000), except that female respondents reported more personal changes affecting their ability to work than male respondents (p = 0.037). On a positive note, most respondents (83%) perceived positive changes during lockdown and 60% reported one or more coping strategies during lockdown, with exercising/outdoor activities and interacting with family/friends most commonly reported. Based on our findings, we provide recommendations for overcoming the reported Covid-19-related challenges which could further deliver valuable guidance for supporting/mentoring schemes and activities fostering a more resilient research community.

Some recommendations for doing high‐impact research in social psychological science

Imagine moving behavioral science findings languishing in scholarly journals to public consumption

Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response

Social psychology and COVID-19: What the field can tell us about behavior in a pandemic

Living under the shadow of a pandemic: The psychological challenges underlying social distancing and awareness raising.

Quality, Replicability, and Transparency in Research in Social Psychology

Researching employee experiences and behavior in times of crisis: Theoretical and methodological considerations and implications for human resource management

Positive psychology in a pandemic: buffering, bolstering, and building mental health

How to Run Behavioural Experiments Online: Best Practice Suggestions for Cognitive Psychology and Neuroscience

How to demonstrate the real-world impact of your research

Validity of energy social research during and after COVID-19: challenges, considerations, and responses

Psychological, Behavioral, and Interpersonal Effects and Clinical Implications for Health Systems of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic: A Call for Research

Impacts of COVID-19: A research agenda to support people in their fight

Hits and misses in the last decade of open science: Researchers from different subfields and career stages offer personal reflections and suggestions

SARS-Cov-2 and environmental protection: A collective psychology agenda for environmental psychology research

Where to Next? The Impact of COVID-19 on Human-Robot Interaction Research

Conductance and Social Capital: Modeling and Empirically Measuring Online Social Influence

Research during the COVID-19 pandemic: ethics, gender and precarious work

Approaching psychology’s current crises by exploring the vagueness of psychological concepts: Recommendations for advancing the discipline.

A social psychology of climate change: Progress and promise

Learning from lockdown - Assessing the positive and negative experiences, and coping strategies of researchers during the COVID-19 pandemic