Abstract:Abstract Background Governments have attempted to combat the COVID-19 pandemic by issuing guidelines for disease prevention behavior (e.g., wearing masks, social distancing, etc.) and by enforcing these guidelines. However, while some citizens have complied with these guidelines, others have ignored them or have even participated in large-scale protests. This research aims both to understand the causes of such variation in citizens’ adherence to government guidelines on disease prevention behavior and to extend the scientific literature on disease prevention to account for the collective resilience of a society to diseases. Thus, this research draws on the health belief model and collective resilience theory to develop hypotheses about the determinants of a citizen’s disease prevention behavior. These hypotheses deal with how citizens’ vulnerability, attitudes toward disease prevention, and social orientation are associated with COVID-19 prevention behaviors. Methods From March 24 to April 4, 2020, a cross-sectional online survey was conducted in Bolivia. It included questions on demographic characteristics, chronic health problems, emotional burden, attitudes towards preventive behaviors, trust in public institutions, and culture. Among 5265 participants who clicked on the survey, 1857 at least partially filled it out. After removing data with missing responses to any variable, the final sample consists of 1231 respondents. The collected data were analyzed using hierarchical linear modeling. Results Regarding a citizen’s vulnerability, chronic health problems have a U-shaped association with disease prevention behavior. Moreover, age, female gender, and worries have positive associations with disease prevention behavior, whereas depression showed a negative association. Regarding attitudes toward disease prevention, trust in public institutions, and attitudes toward social distancing, a government-imposed lockdown and the enforcement of this lockdown showed positive associations with disease prevention behavior. Regarding social orientation, individualism and collectivism both have positive relationships with disease prevention behavior. Conclusions In the COVID-19 pandemic, a citizen’s low vulnerability, weak social orientation, and beliefs about low benefits of disease prevention behavior are associated with poor compliance with guidelines on disease prevention behavior. More research on these associations would help generalize these findings to other populations and other public health crises.

Social influence matters: We follow pandemic guidelines most when our close circle does

Political and community logics jointly affect 'social distancing' compliance

Social alignment matters: Following pandemic guidelines is associated with better wellbeing

Prevention for oneself or others? Psychological and social factors that explain social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic

Mass behaviour change amid COVID-19: How public health information and social norms explain the transformation

The Emotional Path to Action: Empathy Promotes Physical Distancing and Wearing of Face Masks During the COVID-19 Pandemic

The Role of Collective Group Orientation and Social Norms on Physical Distancing Behaviors for Disease Prevention

Socio-demographic factors associated with self-protecting behavior during the Covid-19 pandemic

How Vicarious Experiences Influence Non‐compliance with COVID‐19 Prevention Regulations

Culture and contagion: Individualism and compliance with COVID-19 policy

Local risk perception enhances epidemic control

Collectivism fosters preventive behaviors to contain the spread of COVID‐19: Implications for social marketing in public health

Cultural orientation, power, belief in conspiracy theories, and intentions to reduce the spread of COVID‐19

Collectivism, individualism and COVID-19 prevention: a cross sectional study of personality, culture and behavior among Canadians

A Bayesian approach to reveal the key role of mask wearing in modulating projected interpersonal distance during the first COVID-19 outbreak

Basic human values & compliance with government-recommended prosocial health behavior

Physical distancing during the COVID‐19 crisis: The roles of threat and moralization

Social values, self- and collective efficacy explaining behaviours in coping with Covid-19: Self-interested consumption and physical distancing in the first 10 days of confinement in Spain

The crowding of social distancing: How social context and interpersonal connections affect individual responses to the coronavirus*

Factors influencing social distancing to prevent the community spread of COVID-19 among Chinese adults

Explaining interpersonal differences in COVID-19 disease prevention behavior based on the health belief model and collective resilience theory: a cross-sectional study from Bolivia