Protective effects of IRFI-042 in monensin induced neurotoxicity in chicks.

M. Caló,H. Marini,A. Bitto,D. Altavilla,F. Polito,L. Minutoli,P. Lo Cascio,S. Antoci,F. Squadrito

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2008.09.009

IF: 4.3

2008-11-01

Food and Chemical Toxicology

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Psychological, Behavioral, and Interpersonal Effects and Clinical Implications for Health Systems of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic: A Call for Research

Gianluca Castelnuovo,Andrea De Giorgio,Gian Mauro Manzoni,Darren C Treadway,Changiz Mohiyeddini

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02146

2020-09-24

Abstract:The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) emerged at the end of 2019 and was classified as a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) on March 11, 2020. Both the COVID-19 emergency and the extraordinary measures to contain it have negatively affected the life of billions of people and have threatened individuals and nations. One of the main goals of clinical and health psychology during this pandemic is to investigate the behavioral, cognitive, emotional, and psychobiological responses to the COVID-19 emergency as well as to the preventive measures that have been imposed by governments to limit the contagion, such as social isolation. Psychological research has the responsibility to deliver sound empirical evidence to inform public health policies and to support and advise governments and policymakers in their introduction of sustainable, feasible, and cost-efficient prevention and intervention guidelines. Hence, the goal of this call for research is to stimulate theoretical discussions and empirical investigations on the bio-psycho-social impacts of COVID-19 for individuals, groups, and nations. We invite contributions that address the challenges that the COVID-19 emergency has imposed on couples, families, and social systems. In addition, we call for studies that assess the specific effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on highly vulnerable populations such as children, adolescents, pregnant women, patients suffering from chronic and life-threatening conditions, healthcare workers, and elderly citizens. Papers focusing on the impact of emotion regulation and coping strategies are encouraged. Original research, data reports, study protocols, single case reports and community case studies, theoretical perspectives, and viewpoints are invited to help improve our understanding of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science

Emily A Holmes,Rory C O'Connor,V Hugh Perry,Irene Tracey,Simon Wessely,Louise Arseneault,Clive Ballard,Helen Christensen,Roxane Cohen Silver,Ian Everall,Tamsin Ford,Ann John,Thomas Kabir,Kate King,Ira Madan,Susan Michie,Andrew K Przybylski,Roz Shafran,Angela Sweeney,Carol M Worthman,Lucy Yardley,Katherine Cowan,Claire Cope,Matthew Hotopf,Ed Bullmore

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30168-1

IF: 77.056

2020-06-01

The Lancet Psychiatry

Abstract:<h2 class="section-title u-h3 u-margin-l-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Summary</h2><p>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is having a profound effect on all aspects of society, including mental health and physical health. We explore the psychological, social, and neuroscientific effects of COVID-19 and set out the immediate priorities and longer-term strategies for mental health science research. These priorities were informed by surveys of the public and an expert panel convened by the UK Academy of Medical Sciences and the mental health research charity, MQ: Transforming Mental Health, in the first weeks of the pandemic in the UK in March, 2020. We urge UK research funding agencies to work with researchers, people with lived experience, and others to establish a high level coordination group to ensure that these research priorities are addressed, and to allow new ones to be identified over time. The need to maintain high-quality research standards is imperative. International collaboration and a global perspective will be beneficial. An immediate priority is collecting high-quality data on the mental health effects of the COVID-19 pandemic across the whole population and vulnerable groups, and on brain function, cognition, and mental health of patients with COVID-19. There is an urgent need for research to address how mental health consequences for vulnerable groups can be mitigated under pandemic conditions, and on the impact of repeated media consumption and health messaging around COVID-19. Discovery, evaluation, and refinement of mechanistically driven interventions to address the psychological, social, and neuroscientific aspects of the pandemic are required. Rising to this challenge will require integration across disciplines and sectors, and should be done together with people with lived experience. New funding will be required to meet these priorities, and it can be efficiently leveraged by the UK's world-leading infrastructure. This Position Paper provides a strategy that may be both adapted for, and integrated with, research efforts in other countries.</p>

English Else
Meta-research on COVID-19: An overview of the early trends

Giovanni Colavizza

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.02961

2021-06-05

Digital Libraries

Abstract:COVID-19 is having a dramatic impact on research and researchers. The pandemic has underlined the severity of known challenges in research and surfaced new ones, but also accelerated the adoption of innovations and manifested new opportunities. This review considers early trends emerging from meta-research on COVID-19. In particular, it focuses on the following topics: i) mapping COVID-19 research; ii) data and machine learning; iii) research practices including open access and open data, reviewing, publishing and funding; iv) communicating research to the public; v) the impact of COVID-19 on researchers, in particular with respect to gender and career trajectories. This overview finds that most early meta-research on COVID-19 has been reactive and focused on short-term questions, while more recently a shift to consider the long-term consequences of COVID-19 is taking place. Based on these findings, the author speculates that some aspects of doing research during COVID-19 are more likely to persist than others. These include: the shift to virtual for academic events such as conferences; the use of openly accessible pre-prints; the `datafication' of scholarly literature and consequent broader adoption of machine learning in science communication; the public visibility of research and researchers on social and online media.
Post pandemic research priorities: A consensus statement from the HL-PIVOT

Mark A Faghy,Ross Arena,Abraham Samuel Babu,Jeffrey W Christle,Susan Marzolini,Dejana Popovic,Amber Vermeesch,Nicolaas P Pronk,Lee Stoner,Andy Smith,HL-PIVOT Network

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2022.07.001

Abstract:We have been amid unhealthy living and related chronic disease pandemics for several decades. These longstanding crises have troublingly synergized with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The need to establish research priorities in response to COVID-19 can be used to address broad health and wellbeing, social and economic impacts for the future is emerging. Accordingly, this paper sets out a series of research priorities that could inform interdisciplinary collaboration between clinical sciences, public health, business, technology, economics, healthcare providers, and the exercise science/sports medicine communities, among others. A five-step methodology was used to generate and evaluate the research priorities with a focus on broad health and well-being impacts. The methodology was deployed by an international and interdisciplinary team from the Healthy Living for Pandemic Event Protection (HL- PIVOT) network. This team were all engaged in responding to the Pandemic either on the 'front-line' and/or in leadership positions ensuring the currency and authenticity of the process. Eight research priorities were identified clustered into two groups: i) Societal & Environmental, and ii) Clinical. Our eight research priorities are presented with insight from previously published research priorities from other groups.
[Chronic total coronary occlusion dis-obstruction by balloon angioplasty].

J. Melchior,B. Meier,L. Finci,G. Steffenino,J. Noble,W. Rutishauser

Abstract:Ninety-three consecutive patients with chronic total coronary occlusion underwent an attempted mechanical des-obliteration by percutaneous coronary angioplasty with a balloon catheter. The global results were 55 p. 100 initial successes (residual stenosis less than 50 p. 100). The good prognostic factors were: 1) left coronary artery, especially left circumflex artery occlusion p less than 0.50, and 2) the proximity to the date of occlusion as assessed from the clinical history or by the occurrence of occlusion between the time of diagnostic coronary angiography and angioplasty. In cases of recent occlusion dating less than one month, the success rate was high: 69 p. 100. On the other hand, there were no successes in occlusions of over 6 months standing. The presence of myocardial infarction did not influence the results. There were few complications (7 p. 100) and these did not include any deaths or cases requiring emergency surgery. Exercise stress tests were carried out after the procedure and were negative in 28 out of 32 patients (88 p. 100). Forty-three patients successfully revascularised were followed up for 1 to 48 months (average 9 months) after angioplasty. Thirty-one patients were asymptomatic. Of the 12 symptomatic patients, 7 underwent exercise stress tests (6 positive) and all had control angiography which showed restenosis in 10 cases with 5 occlusions. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty of recent total coronary occlusions gives good initial results without major complications, and the medium term clinical results are satisfactory.
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on information management research and practice: Transforming education, work and life

Yogesh K. Dwivedi,D. Laurie Hughes,Crispin Coombs,Ioanna Constantiou,Yanqing Duan,John S. Edwards,Babita Gupta,Banita Lal,Santosh Misra,Prakhar Prashant,Ramakrishnan Raman,Nripendra P. Rana,Sujeet K. Sharma,Nitin Upadhyay

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102211

IF: 18.958

2020-12-01

International Journal of Information Management

Abstract:<p>The COVID-19 pandemic has forced many organisations to undergo significant transformation, rethinking key elements of their business processes and use of technology to maintain operations whilst adhering to a changing landscape of guidelines and new procedures. This study offers a collective insight to many of the key issues and underlying complexities affecting organisations and society from COVID-19, through an information systems and technological perspective. The views of 12 invited subject experts are collated and analysed where each articulate their individual perspectives relating to: online learning, digital strategy, artificial intelligence, information management, social interaction, cyber security, big data, blockchain, privacy, mobile technology and strategy through the lens of the current crisis and impact on these specific areas. The expert perspectives offer timely insight to the range of topics, identifying key issues and recommendations for theory and practice.</p>

information science & library science
Researching COVID-19: A research agenda for public policy and administration scholars

Claire A Dunlop,Edoardo Ongaro,Keith Baker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076720939631

IF: 2.909

2020-08-01

Public Policy and Administration

Abstract:Coronavirus (COVID-19) is one of the defining policy challenges of an era. In this article, we sketch some possible ways in which the public policy and administration community can make an enduring contribution about how to cope with this terrible crisis. We do so by offering some elements that delineate a tentative research agenda for public policy and administration scholars, to be pursued with epistemic humility. We outline the contours of seven analytical themes that are central to the challenges presented by COVID-19: policy design and instruments, policy learning, public service and its publics, organisational capacity, public governance, administrative traditions and public sector reforms in multi-level governance (MLG). The list is neither exhaustive nor exclusive to COVID-19. The knowledge we can generate must speak not only to the daunting challenge of COVID-19 itself but also to policymakers, and indeed humankind, trying to cope with future unexpected but high impact threats, by leveraging better public policies and building administrative capacities to enable more resilient, equitable and effective public services.

public administration
Uncertainties in a time of changing research practices

Robert Meckin,Melanie Nind,Andy Coverdale

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2023.2173421

2023-08-11

International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice

Abstract:The COVID-19 pandemic wrought uncertainty into everyday life in abrupt and dynamic ways. State, regional, community and institutional responses to the spread of COVID-19 across the globe had profound and immediate implications for the conduct of social research. Measures like physical distancing, travel and movement restrictions, and face-mask mandates disrupted many widespread social research practices such that researchers in many disciplines found they were having to rethink their plans. Initially, conventional face-to-face interviews were out, as were most physically co-present forms of data generation as people and organisations found the risks too high. Shifts to online data generation or using secondary data were attractive, but these were not universally available or appropriate. In the subsequent months and years as COVID-19 has moved differently through populations, regions and countries, with different approaches to governance and containment, physical and organisational restrictions have come and gone and social research methods and methodologies have been continually affected. Concerns about research project life courses have waxed and waned as the potential for lockdowns and other restrictions have risen and fallen with the cyclical spread of the virus. The ongoing uncertainties with respect to COVID-19 include knowing about the biological and infective behaviour of the virus; the dynamism in this means that societal, organisational and governmental responses continue to be unpredictable as models and systems are also in high states of flux (Pearce, Citation 2020 ). In other words, un/certainties were, and arguably still are, having a more significant impact on how we live and how we research. However, as contributions to this special issue show, COVID-19 is just one dimension of many intersecting phenomena that distribute uncertainties unevenly through populations and research method practices.
Perspectives of patients, family members, health professionals and the public on the impact of COVID-19 on mental health

Evangeline Gardiner,Amanda Baumgart,Allison Tong,Julian H Elliott,Luciano Cesar Azevedo,Andrew Bersten,Lilia Cervantes,Derek P Chew,Yeoungjee Cho,Sally Crowe,Ivor S Douglas,Nicole Evangelidis,Ella Flemyng,Peter Horby,Martin Howell,Jaehee Lee,Eduardo Lorca,Deena Lynch,John C Marshall,Andrea Matus Gonzalez,Anne McKenzie,Karine Manera,Sangeeta Mehta,Mervyn Mer,Andrew Conway Morris,Saad Nseir,Pedro Povoa,Mark Reid,Yasser Sakr,Ning Shen,Alan R Smyth,Tom Snelling,Giovanni F M Strippoli,Armando Teixeira-Pinto,Antoni Torres,Andrea K Viecelli,Steve Webb,Paula R Williamson,Laila Woc-Colburn,Junhua Zhang,Jonathan C Craig

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2021.2022637

Abstract:Background: The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has seen a global surge in anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and stress. Aims: This study aimed to describe the perspectives of patients with COVID-19, their family, health professionals, and the general public on the impact of COVID-19 on mental health. Methods: A secondary thematic analysis was conducted using data from the COVID-19 COS project. We extracted data on the perceived causes and impact of COVID-19 on mental health from an international survey and seven online consensus workshops. Results: We identified four themes (with subthemes in parenthesis): anxiety amidst uncertainty (always on high alert, ebb and flow of recovery); anguish of a threatened future (intense frustration of a changed normality, facing loss of livelihood, trauma of ventilation, a troubling prognosis, confronting death); bearing responsibility for transmission (fear of spreading COVID-19 in public; overwhelming guilt of infecting a loved one); and suffering in isolation (severe solitude of quarantine, sick and alone, separation exacerbating grief). Conclusion: We found that the unpredictability of COVID-19, the fear of long-term health consequences, burden of guilt, and suffering in isolation profoundly impacted mental health. Clinical and public health interventions are needed to manage the psychological consequences arising from this pandemic.
Research during the COVID-19 pandemic: ethics, gender and precarious work

Caitlin Buckle

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2020.1857907

2021-01-26

International Journal of Housing Policy

Abstract:In this essay, I reflect on my experiences of undertaking housing research during the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic has had vast global impacts beyond the massive loss of life; disrupting economies, environments and social systems and creating a global housing crisis. Due to these extreme circumstances, conducting research at this time can have unforeseen challenges. I discuss these challenges, and their impacts (1) on research participants and (2) on researchers, as well as (3) on the quality of research outputs that can be produced. These challenges are situated within narratives of my own personal experiences as an early-career researcher and mother, conducting housing research on COVID-related topics. I offer advice on whether research should be conducted under the difficult circumstances created by the pandemic, and future priorities for the housing research community.

environmental studies,regional & urban planning,urban studies
Early impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health care and on people with mental health conditions: framework synthesis of international experiences and responses

Luke Sheridan Rains,Sonia Johnson,Phoebe Barnett,Thomas Steare,Justin J Needle,Sarah Carr,Billie Lever Taylor,Francesca Bentivegna,Julian Edbrooke-Childs,Hannah Rachel Scott,Jessica Rees,Prisha Shah,Jo Lomani,Beverley Chipp,Nick Barber,Zainab Dedat,Sian Oram,Nicola Morant,Alan Simpson,COVID-19 Mental Health Policy Research Unit Group,Alexia Papamichail,Anna Moore,Annie Jeffery,Blanca Sanz-Magallón Duque De Estrada,Brendan Hallam,Brynmor Lloyd-Evans,Carolina Yanez Contreras,Celia Esteban Serna,Chukwuma Ntephe,Daphne Lamirel,Eleanor Cooke,Eiluned Pearce,Frederike Lemmel,Freya Koutsoubelis,Guendalina Cragnolini,Jasmine Harju-Seppänen,Jingyi Wang,Joseph Botham,Karima Abdou,Karolin Krause,Kati Jane Turner,Konstantina Poursanidou,Lisa Gruenwald,Louisa Jagmetti,Lucia Mazzocchi,Magdalena Tomaskova,Marcella Montagnese,Mélanie Mahé,Merle Schlief,Mia Maria Günak,Monica Leverton,Natasha Lyons,Norha Vera,Qian Gao,Raza Griffiths,Rebecca Lane,Riccardo Busato,Sarah Ledden,Scarlett Mac-Ginty,Selina Hardt,Sofia Orlando,Steve Gillard,Tamar Jeynes,Tamara Ondrušková,Theodora Stefanidou,Una Foye,Vasiliki Tzouvara,Victoria Cavero

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-020-01924-7

Abstract:Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic has many potential impacts on people with mental health conditions and on mental health care, including direct consequences of infection, effects of infection control measures and subsequent societal changes. We aimed to map early impacts of the pandemic on people with pre-existing mental health conditions and services they use, and to identify individual and service-level strategies adopted to manage these. Methods: We searched for relevant material in the public domain published before 30 April 2020, including papers in scientific and professional journals, published first person accounts, media articles, and publications by governments, charities and professional associations. Search languages were English, French, German, Italian, Spanish, and Mandarin Chinese. Relevant content was retrieved and summarised via a rapid qualitative framework synthesis approach. Results: We found 872 eligible sources from 28 countries. Most documented observations and experiences rather than reporting research data. We found many reports of deteriorations in symptoms, and of impacts of loneliness and social isolation and of lack of access to services and resources, but sometimes also of resilience, effective self-management and peer support. Immediate service challenges related to controlling infection, especially in inpatient and residential settings, and establishing remote working, especially in the community. We summarise reports of swiftly implemented adaptations and innovations, but also of pressing ethical challenges and concerns for the future. Conclusion: Our analysis captures the range of stakeholder perspectives and experiences publicly reported in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in several countries. We identify potential foci for service planning and research.
Work, Life and COVID-19: a Rapid Review and Practical Recommendations for the Post-Pandemic Workplace

Xi Wen Chan,Sudong Shang,Paula Brough,Adrian Wilkinson,Chang-qin Lu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12355

2023-01-01

Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources

Abstract:Remote working because of the COVID-19 pandemic has eroded boundaries between work and home, necessitating the need to evaluate the long-term impacts of these changes and mitigate any negative effects on workers' work-life experiences. To do so, we reviewed and examined work-life research published since the start of the pandemic. The review yielded a sample of 303 work-life scholarly articles, with three common themes: 1) work-life boundaries have become more permeable, with behavior-based and time-based work-life conflict emerging as the more salient forms of work-life conflict; 2) technical work demands have increased, as employees grapple with techno-invasion, techno-overload and techno-complexity; and 3) psychological and emotional work demands have intensified. Based on these key findings, we call for multi-level and multi-agency responses to deal with the complex, diverse nature of work-life demands. Specifically, we offer recommendations at the individual-, team/organizational- and societal/governmental-levels to enhance employees' work and non-work lives after the pandemic.
A systematic review on the impacts of Covid‐19 on work: Contributions and a path forward from the perspectives of ergonomics and psychodynamics of work

Tiago F. A. C. Sigahi,Bruno C. Kawasaki,Ivan Bolis,Sandra N. Morioka

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20889

2021-02-12

Abstract:<p>Work is a major issue in the discussions on the Covid‐19 pandemic, whose consequences impair the capacities of workers at all organizational levels and impose unexpected challenges on managers. Nevertheless, the scientific literature still lacks an overview of how researchers have been covering the issue. This article presents a systematic review to investigate the impact of Covid‐19 on work and workers of all occupations, reveal research gaps, and help managers to adapt to organizations amid the pandemic. This review is based on a sample of 258 papers from Web of Science and Scopus databases. Quantitative and qualitative analysis indicated a vast majority of studies focused on frontline healthcare workers and a lack of empirical investigation on managers' work. We show how literature has been addressing different aspects of work (e.g., workers' health, working conditions, procedures, protection equipment, remote working, etc.) in the various economic sectors. We discuss the results in light of ergonomics and psychodynamics of work, two disciplines that conceive work and organization as intimately connected, and that can assist managers in meeting the difficulties brought by the pandemic. We highlight that considering the construction of health, interindividual variability, subjective relation to work, supportive workplace environment, and organizational and individual capabilities can play a key role in successfully adapting and transforming organizations in the current scenario.</p>

engineering, manufacturing,ergonomics
Working during the COVID-19 pandemic: Understanding employee mental health

Anamika Viswanathan,Vishal Agrawal,Preeti Kodancha,Shubhanginidevi Jhala,Aishwarya Naik,Anwesha Guha,Vijayalaya Srinivas T

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ipj.ipj_72_21

2023-01-01

Industrial Psychiatry Journal

Abstract:Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has radically transformed workplaces, bearing an adverse impact on the mental health of employees.Aim: The current study attempts to gain an understanding of the mental health of employees while working from home (WFH) during the COVID-19 pandemic.Setting and Design: The research followed a mixed-methods design and was conducted across two phases, with participants divided into two subgroups - the WFH subgroup (currently engaging in WFH) and the not working from home (NWFH) subgroup (unable to engage in vocational tasks due to the pandemic).Materials and Methods: The first phase employed quantitative standardized measures of workplace well-being, work and social adjustment, and quality of mental health across 187 participants. The second phase involved in-depth interviews of 31 participants selected from the previous phase, to understand the factors impacting mental health.Results: Strong correlations were recorded between the mental health of an individual and work-related constructs such as workplace well-being and work and social adjustment. The study revealed that participants rated themselves as being significantly more stressed and less productive during the pandemic. Thematic analysis identified the stressors (factors that negatively impact mental health) and enhancers (factors that enhance mental health). Fourteen stressors and 12 enhancers were identified for the WFH group, while five stressors and three enhancers were identified for the NWFH group.Conclusions: The results of the study indicate a significant relationship between the mental health of employees and work-related experiences through the pandemic. Further research on the stressors and enhancers identified through the study can pave the way for effective interventions to promote employee mental health.
Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response

Jay J. Van Bavel,Katherine Baicker,Paulo S. Boggio,Valerio Capraro,Aleksandra Cichocka,Mina Cikara,Molly J. Crockett,Alia J. Crum,Karen M. Douglas,James N. Druckman,John Drury,Oeindrila Dube,Naomi Ellemers,Eli J. Finkel,James H. Fowler,Michele Gelfand,Shihui Han,S. Alexander Haslam,Jolanda Jetten,Shinobu Kitayama,Dean Mobbs,Lucy E. Napper,Dominic J. Packer,Gordon Pennycook,Ellen Peters,Richard E. Petty,David G. Rand,Stephen D. Reicher,Simone Schnall,Azim Shariff,Linda J. Skitka,Sandra Susan Smith,Cass R. Sunstein,Nassim Tabri,Joshua A. Tucker,Sander van der Linden,Paul van Lange,Kim A. Weeden,Michael J. A. Wohl,Jamil Zaki,Sean R. Zion,Robb Willer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z

IF: 24.252

2020-04-30

Nature Human Behaviour

Abstract:The COVID-19 pandemic represents a massive global health crisis. Because the crisis requires large-scale behaviour change and places significant psychological burdens on individuals, insights from the social and behavioural sciences can be used to help align human behaviour with the recommendations of epidemiologists and public health experts. Here we discuss evidence from a selection of research topics relevant to pandemics, including work on navigating threats, social and cultural influences on behaviour, science communication, moral decision-making, leadership, and stress and coping. In each section, we note the nature and quality of prior research, including uncertainty and unsettled issues. We identify several insights for effective response to the COVID-19 pandemic and highlight important gaps researchers should move quickly to fill in the coming weeks and months.

psychology, experimental,neurosciences,multidisciplinary sciences
The Social and Economic Impact of Covid-19 on Family Functioning and Well-Being: Where do we go from here?

Claudia Andrade,Martie Gillen,José Alberto Molina,Melissa J. Wilmarth

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-022-09848-x

2022-05-28

Journal of Family and Economic Issues

Abstract:A growing body of research demonstrates that COVID-19 has had a profound impact on family functioning and well-being in a range of countries. The fear and uncertainty of the health risks, in addition to the stress from ensuing restrictions and constraints on everyday life caused major disruptions, impacting the financial, emotional, and physical well-being of adults and children alike. In this report, we summarize the current literature on the impact of COVID-19 disruption to family functioning and economic well-being as a context for this special issue. Our findings indicate that while the pandemic may have caused a reallocation of intra-familial tasks, a large gender disparity remains regarding the proportion of domestic work and childcare. The pandemic disproportionally impacted lower-income families, families from ethnic minority and vulnerable groups, and women. Finally, the financial impacts of the emergence in Spring of 2020 have strained family relationships, although the effects depend to a large extent on quality of the relationships and family well-being before COVID-19. To address the long-term bidirectional effects of the pandemic on family well-being and the well-being of the global economy calls for research that crosses disciplinary divides.
Management research contributions to the COVID-19: a bibliometric literature review and analysis of the contributions from the Journal of Management & Organization

Oluremi B. Ayoko,Andrea Caputo,John Mendy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2021.70

2021-11-01

Abstract:Abstract The COVID-19 health crisis triggered changes in the workplace. This paper explores the insights from scholarly work published in the Journal of Management and Organization ( JMO ) and systematizes this body of knowledge to build a scientific overview that looks at how the COVID-19 health crisis and its repercussions may be managed by organizations. We conducted a bibliometric investigation of JMO 's most influential papers published from 1995 to June 2020 that offers insights into the management of the COVID-19 crisis. Our bibliometric investigation reveals six clusters: (1) conservation of resources theory, entrepreneurs, gender and work–family conflict; (2) corporate governance, corporate social responsibility and stakeholder salience; (3) family firms, innovation and research methods; (4) creativity, leadership and organizational change; (5) job satisfaction and psychological empowerment; and (6) team performance. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our findings.

management
COVID-19 and finance: Agendas for future research

John W Goodell,John W. Goodell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101512

IF: 9.848

2020-07-01

Finance Research Letters

Abstract:<p>This paper highlights the enormous economic and social impact of COVID-19 with respect to articles that have either prognosticated such a large-scale event, and its economic consequences, or have assessed the impacts of other epidemics and pandemics. A consideration of possible impacts of COVID-19 on financial markets and institutions, either directly or indirectly, is briefly outlined by drawing on a variety of literatures. A consideration of the characteristics of COVID-19, along with what research suggests have been the impacts of other past events that in some ways roughly parallel COVID-19, points toward avenues of future investigation.</p>

business, finance
COVID-19 Pandemic: Assessment of Current Strategies and Socio-economic Impact

Anushka Bhargava,Praveen Dahiya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09720634221109295

2022-07-15

Journal of Health Management

Abstract:Journal of Health Management, Ahead of Print. The coronavirus disease is a respiratory tract disorder which causes pneumonia-like symptoms in severe patients and mild flu-like symptoms in mild symptomatic cases first noticed in Wuhan, China. DNA sequencing and further analysis shows it to be 79% like the 2002 SARS-CoV and 50% like the 2012 MERS-CoV. It was also observed that the novel coronavirus's spike protein was larger and very different from its previously known strains. For diagnosis, multiple strategies were developed and real time reverse-transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technique was determined to be the best technique. The CT scan was also found effective majorly for the continuous assessment of the disease. Treatment strategies used in previous outbreaks were looked into and put to trial like convalescent plasma therapy. Vaccine development using various genetic engineering strategies are going on across the world. To contain the spread of the disease, countries with positive cases were put under lockdown to break the chain of spread. These lockdowns forced industries, offices, schools, religious places, stadiums, travel, and many more to close which impacted the economies of all the major countries. Lesser human interaction and more use of social media has impacted the social aspects of human life. Cases of domestic violence and mental stress increased among households. Economic stimulus package was announced by various countries to curb the socio-economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Student mental health in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic: A call for further research and immediate solutions

Nicholas Grubic,Shaylea Badovinac,Amer M Johri

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764020925108

2020-05-02

International Journal of Social Psychiatry

Abstract:With the global development of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak, the psychological issues which accompany this pandemic have rapidly compounded its public health burden (Torales et al., 2020). Emerging research assessing the mental health implications of COVID-19 has identified a heightened prevalence of moderate-to-severe self-reported depressive and anxious symptomatology among the general public (Wang et al., 2020), reflecting the widespread effects of uncertainty and health-related fears. However, further research that investigates beyond the population level is required to understand the individualized disruption of lives and routines as a result of COVID-19, and its associated psychological impacts.

Protective effects of IRFI-042 in monensin induced neurotoxicity in chicks.

Psychological, Behavioral, and Interpersonal Effects and Clinical Implications for Health Systems of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic: A Call for Research

Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science

Meta-research on COVID-19: An overview of the early trends

Post pandemic research priorities: A consensus statement from the HL-PIVOT

[Chronic total coronary occlusion dis-obstruction by balloon angioplasty].

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on information management research and practice: Transforming education, work and life

Researching COVID-19: A research agenda for public policy and administration scholars

Uncertainties in a time of changing research practices

Perspectives of patients, family members, health professionals and the public on the impact of COVID-19 on mental health

Research during the COVID-19 pandemic: ethics, gender and precarious work

Early impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health care and on people with mental health conditions: framework synthesis of international experiences and responses

Work, Life and COVID-19: a Rapid Review and Practical Recommendations for the Post-Pandemic Workplace

A systematic review on the impacts of Covid‐19 on work: Contributions and a path forward from the perspectives of ergonomics and psychodynamics of work

Working during the COVID-19 pandemic: Understanding employee mental health

Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response

The Social and Economic Impact of Covid-19 on Family Functioning and Well-Being: Where do we go from here?

Management research contributions to the COVID-19: a bibliometric literature review and analysis of the contributions from the Journal of Management & Organization

COVID-19 and finance: Agendas for future research

COVID-19 Pandemic: Assessment of Current Strategies and Socio-economic Impact

Student mental health in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic: A call for further research and immediate solutions