Abstract:Evidence-based decision-making is most effective with comprehensive access to scientific studies. If studies face significant publication delays or barriers, the useful information they contain may not reach decision-makers in a timely manner. This represents a potential problem for mission-oriented disciplines where access to the latest data is required to ensure effective actions are undertaken. We sought to analyse the severity of publication delay in conservation science—a field that requires urgent action to prevent the loss of biodiversity. We used the Conservation Evidence database to assess the length of publication delay (time from finishing data collection to publication) in the literature that tests the effectiveness of conservation interventions. From 7,447 peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed studies of conservation interventions published over eleven decades, we find that the raw mean publication delay was 3.2 years (±2SD = 0.1) and varied by conservation subject. A significantly shorter delay was observed for studies focused on Bee Conservation, Sustainable Aquaculture, Management of Captive Animals, Amphibian Conservation, and Control of Freshwater Invasive Species (Estimated Marginal Mean range from 1.4–1.9 years). Publication delay was significantly shorter for the non-peer-reviewed literature (Estimated Marginal Mean delay of 1.9 years ± 0.2) compared to the peer-reviewed literature ( i.e ., scientific journals; Estimated Marginal Mean delay of 3.0 years ± 0.1). We found publication delay has significantly increased over time (an increase of ~1.2 years from 1912 (1.4 years ± 0.2) to 2020 (2.6 years ± 0.1)), but this change was much weaker and non-significant post-2000s; we found no evidence for any decline. There was also no evidence that studies on more threatened species were subject to a shorter delay—indeed, the contrary was true for mammals, and to a lesser extent for birds. We suggest a range of possible ways in which scientists, funders, publishers, and practitioners can work together to reduce delays at each stage of the publication process.

The impact factor of engaged research: Metrics for conservation outcomes

Impact Evaluation to Communicate and Improve Conservation Non-Governmental Organization Performance: the Case of Conservation International

The positive impact of conservation action

Achieving Open Access to Conservation Science

Reaching and implementing the best available knowledge in wildlife biology

Analysis of the Impact Factor and JCR Rankings in Conservation Science Journals: Why JCR Should Have a Heritage Category

Measuring the Impact of Conservation: The Growing Importance of Monitoring Fauna, Flora and Funga

Now is the time for academics to think and act beyond academia

Expanding Conservation Science through Emerging Interdisciplinary STEM Fields

Evidence-based research impact praxis: Integrating scholarship and practice to ensure research benefits society

A measure for the impact of research

Reducing publication delay to improve the efficiency and impact of conservation science

How to demonstrate the real-world impact of your research

Bibliometric Analysis of Global Engagement Research: Trends, Prolific Authors, and Impact in Environmental Science and Business & Economics Fields

Conservation through connection: Approaches to engaging communities in applied grizzly bear research

Biodiversity conservation as a promising frontier for behavioural science

Making more effective use of human behavioural science in conservation interventions

Research methods and reporting practices in zoo and aquarium conservation‐education evaluation

Quantity over quality of publications: Are we using the right metrics to judge author's productivity and impact in biomedical research?

Measuring impact in research evaluations: A thorough discussion of methods for, effects of, and problems with impact measurements

An Integrated Impact Indicator: A new definition of 'Impact' with policy relevance