Proenvironmental behaviour spillover

Sandra J. Geiger

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00043-1

2022-03-09

Nature Reviews Psychology

Abstract:Nature Reviews Psychology, Published online: 09 March 2022; doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00043-1In this Journal Club, Sandra Geiger describes a meta-analysis of intervention studies on spillover effects in environmental decisions.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Meta-analysis of pro-environmental behaviour spillover

Alexander Maki,Amanda R. Carrico,Kaitlin T. Raimi,Heather Barnes Truelove,Brandon Araujo,Kam Leung Yeung

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0263-9

IF: 27.6

2019-04-01

Nature Sustainability

Abstract:When people engage in a first pro-environmental behaviour (PEB1; for example, conserving energy at home), are they more or less likely (positive and negative spillover, respectively) to engage in other pro-environmental behaviours (‘PEB2’; for example, conserving water at home)? We examined evidence for spillover using a meta-analysis of interventions. We coded 22 studies and unpublished data that fulfilled the following criteria: used experimental or quasi-experimental design, showed change in a PEB1 and measured at least one PEB2. Analysis of the 77 effect sizes found in these studies showed that the overall spillover from a PEB1 was positive, though small, on the intention to perform a PEB2 (pooled mean effect size estimate d+ = 0.17). However, the spillover effect was negative and small for actual behaviour (d+ = −0.03) and policy support (d+ = −0.01) for PEB2. Positive spillover was most likely when interventions targeted intrinsic motivation and when PEB1 and PEB2 were similar. Future research in the area should target and measure spillover processes, collect larger samples and statistically test for spillover in more consistent ways.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and theoretical framework

Heather Barnes Truelove,Amanda R. Carrico,Elke U. Weber,Kaitlin Toner Raimi,Michael P. Vandenbergh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.004

IF: 11.16

2014-11-01

Global Environmental Change

Abstract:A recent surge of research has investigated the potential of pro-environmental behavior interventions to affect other pro-environmental behaviors not initially targeted by the intervention. The evidence evaluating these spillover effects has been mixed, with some studies finding evidence for positive spillover (i.e., one pro-environmental behavior increases the likelihood of performing additional pro-environmental behaviors) and others finding negative spillover (i.e., one pro-environmental behavior decreases the likelihood of additional pro-environmental behaviors). Different academic disciplines have investigated this question, employing different methodologies and arriving at divergent findings. This paper provides a unifying theoretical framework and uses the framework to review the existing research on pro-environmental behavior spillover. Our framework identifies different decision modes as competing mechanisms that drive adoption of initial pro-environmental behaviors, with different consequences for subsequent pro-environmental behaviors, leading to positive, negative, or no spillover. Attribution of the initial pro-environmental behavior to either an external motivator (e.g., a price signal) or internal motivator (e.g., self-identity) also matters. In addition, the characteristics of and similarity between initial and subsequent pro-environmental behaviors can be expected to moderate predicted spillover effects. We explore the implications of our model for policymakers and practitioners, and suggest key areas where future research on the topic would be most beneficial.
Spillover effects in environmental behaviors, across time and context: a review and research agenda

Andreas Nilsson,Magnus Bergquist,Wesley P. Schultz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1250148

IF: 3.725

2016-11-02

Environmental Education Research

Abstract:When implementing environmental education and interventions to promote one pro-environmental behavior, it is seldom asked if and how non-target pro-environmental behaviors are affected. The spillover effect proposes that engaging in one behavior affects the probability of engagement or disengaging in a second behavior. Therefore, the positive spillover effect predicts that interventions targeting one specific behavioral have the capacity to promote non-targeted and/or future pro-environmental behaviors. However, the negative spillover effect predicts that engaging in a first pro-environmental behavior will prevent or decrease a second pro-environmental behavior. Since the theoretical and empirical basis for positive and negative spillover effects are not sufficiently understood, the present paper (1) suggests a distinction between behavioral, temporal, and contextual spillovers (2) reviews the existing spillover research literature across a variety of environmental domains, (3) presents potential moderators governing the direction of spillover effects, and finally (4) discuss techniques to promote pro-environmental spillovers.

environmental studies,education & educational research
More Green Than Gray? Toward a Sustainable Overview of Environmental Spillover Effects: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis (Preprint)

Sandra J. Geiger,Ladislas Nalborczyk,N. Jostmann,C. Brick

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/OSF.IO/U24TX

2021-03-22

Abstract:Climate change represents a major global challenge. Responding to climate change, interventions have been implemented to encourage sustainable behavior. Such interventions may not only promote the target behavior but also increase (positive spillover) or reduce (negative spillover) non-targeted sustainable intentions and behaviors. This pre-registered meta-analysis integrated the experimental research on environmental spillover. Database searches in several languages supplemented by searches to retrieve unpublished literature yielded 61 aggregated effect sizes from 37 studies and 28 articles (N = 26,749 unique participants). The three-level Bayesian meta-analysis provided moderate support for a small positive spillover on intentions, δ = 0.14, 95% CrI [-0.02, 0.29], and strong support for no spillover on behaviors, δ = 0. Moderator analyses showed that positive spillover on intentions and behaviors combined was more likely when interventions thwarted rather than preserved individual choice, and when they addressed normative rather than personal gain goals. Spillover on intentions and behaviors combined was similar in laboratory, online, and field studies, supporting generalizability across settings. Based on this meta-analysis, we developed the PRO guidelines which emphasize statistical power, reporting, and open science to set standards for robust spillover research. The Bayesian approach allows for robust conclusions about the presence and absence of spillover as well as continuous updating with new evidence. We hope that the Bayesian approach combined with the PRO guidelines paves the way toward a sustainable overview of robust spillover research that independent researchers can easily update.

Computer Science,Environmental Science
Climate-relevant behavioural spillover : A review of the literature

L. Whitmarsh

Abstract:Urgent and radical transition to lower-carbon forms of society is imperative to limit current and future climate change impacts. Behavioural spillover theory offers a way to catalyse broad lifestyle change from one behaviour to another in ways that generate greater impacts than piecemeal interventions. Despite growing policy and research attention, the evidence for behavioural spillover and the processes driving the phenomenon are unclear. The literature is split between studies that provide evidence for positive spillover effects (where an intervention targeting an environmentallyconscious behaviour leads to an increase in another functionally related behaviour) and negative spillover effects (where an intervention targeting an environmentally-conscious behaviour leads to a decrease in another functionally-related behaviour). In summarising findings, particular attention is given to the implications for climate-relevant behaviours. While few examples of climate-relevant behavioural spillover exist, studies do report positive and negative spillovers to other actions, as well as spillovers from behaviour to support for climate change policy. There is also some evidence that easier behaviours can lead to more committed actions. The potential contribution of social practice theory to understanding spillover is discussed, identifying three novel pathways to behavioural spillover: via carriers of practices, materiality, and through relationships between practices within wider systems of practice. In considering future research directions, the relatively neglected role of social norms is discussed as a means to generate the momentum required for substantial lifestyle change, and as a way of circumventing obstructive and intransigent climate change beliefs. Graphical/Visual Abstract and Caption One route through which social practices (adapted from Shove et al., 2012) may evolve, overlaid with spillover processes identified by Thøgersen, (2012)

Environmental Science
Pro-environmental spillover in consumer behavior: existence and drivers

Andrea Stocchetti

Abstract:The thesis focuses on pro-environmental spillover, and is based on a panel study (pre and postintervention online surveys) on a sample of students from Århus University, Denmark. Essay 1 analyzes the existence itself of spillover, showing that this is limited to simple and painless behaviors. Essay 2 focuses on the role played by habits as moderator of the spillover effect. Results show that habits do play a relevant role in shaping spillover trajectories, with individuals holding strong habits in the target behavior being more likely to experience stronger spillover. Essay 3 deals with the role played by incentives in spurring spillover; results suggest that the nature of rewards (monetary vs praise) is not a relevant factor in moderating spillover. Firma dello studente

Environmental Science,Economics
Spillover between pro-environmental behaviours: The role of resources and perceived similarity

Elise A. Margetts,Yoshihisa Kashima

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.07.005

IF: 7.649

2017-04-01

Journal of Environmental Psychology

Abstract:Pro-environmental behavioural spillover – when performing one pro-environmental behaviour (PEB) increases the likelihood of performing another – has been identified as a possible way to increase the amount of environmentally friendly behaviours that individuals perform. The current research investigated this spillover process, the role of chronic environmental motivations, goal priming and behavioural similarity. Three studies (two conducted with students and one conducted with the general Australian public) provided evidence to suggest that positive spillover occurs between PEBs that are similar in terms of the resources required to perform them, but not between PEBs that are resource-dissimilar. There was no evidence to suggest that negative spillover (the instance where performing one PEB lessens the likelihood of subsequently performing another) occurred. Chronic environmental striving seems to independently influence the performance of PEBs, especially spending time to be more environmentally friendly. The role of priming goals in the spillover process remains unclear.

psychology, multidisciplinary,environmental studies
Positive spillover: The result of attitude change

Laura Henn,Siegmar Otto,Florian G. Kaiser

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101429

IF: 7.649

2020-06-01

Journal of Environmental Psychology

Abstract:Behavioral spillover is the phenomenon when a behavior change is accompanied by subsequent changes in other behaviors related to the same goal (e.g., environmental protection). We propose to understand behavioral spillover as the result of attitude change. According to the Campbell Paradigm (see Kaiser, Byrka, & Hartig, 2010), pro-environmental behaviors are an expression of a person's environmental attitude. The higher the person's level of environmental attitude, the more behavioral costs the person will endure to perform pro-environmental behaviors. Thus, if the person's attitude changes, what is commonly called behavioral spillover will occur: For all pro-environmental behaviors, the person's likelihood of engaging in any one of them will increase. We illustrate this argument by presenting a secondary analysis of data showing that an attitude change results in the frequencies of various pro-environmental behaviors increasing by 3.5% on average. Our proposed model of spillover enforces the idea that those who wish to promote sustainable pro-environmental behavior must inspire changes in people's environmental attitudes instead of attempting to change specific behaviors.

psychology, multidisciplinary,environmental studies
Reflecting on Behavioral Spillover in Context: How Do Behavioral Motivations and Awareness Catalyze Other Environmentally Responsible Actions in Brazil, China, and Denmark?

Nick Nash,Lorraine Whitmarsh,Stuart Capstick,John Thøgersen,Valdiney Gouveia,Rafaella de Carvalho Rodrigues Araújo,Marie K. Harder,Xiao Wang,Yuebai Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00788

IF: 3.8

2019-06-04

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract:Responding to serious environmental problems, requires urgent and fundamental shifts in our day-to-day lifestyles. This paper employs a qualitative, cross-cultural approach to explore people's subjective self-reflections on their experiences of pro-environmental behavioral spillover in three countries; Brazil, China, and Denmark. Behavioral spillover is an appealing yet elusive phenomenon, but offers a potential way of encouraging wider, voluntary lifestyle shifts beyond the scope of single behavior change interventions. Behavioral spillover theory proposes that engaging in one pro-environmental action can catalyze the performance of others. To date, evidence for the phenomenon has been mixed, and the causal processes governing relationships between behaviors appear complex, inconsistent and only partly understood. This paper addresses a gap in the literature by investigating accounts of behavioral spillover in three diverse cultural settings using qualitative semi-structured interviews. The analysis shows that while around half of participants overall who were questioned recalled spillover effects, the other half had not consciously experienced spillover. There were few significant differences across cultures, though some forms of spillover effects were reported more in some cultures than others. More environmentally engaged participants across all three countries were significantly more likely to experience spillover than those who were less engaged. Accounts of within-domain spillovers were most commonly reported, mainly comprising waste, resource conservation and consumption-related actions. Accounts of between-domain spillover were very rare. Recollection of contextual and interpersonal spillover effects also emerged from the interviews. Our findings suggest that more conscious behavioral spillover pathways may be limited to those with pre-existing environmental values. Behavioral spillover may comprise multiple pathways incorporating conscious and unconscious processes. We conclude that targeting behavioral catalysts that generate more socially diffuse spillover effects could offer more potential than conventional spillover involving a single individual.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Facilitating Positive Spillover Effects: New Insights From a Mixed-Methods Approach Exploring Factors Enabling People to Live More Sustainable Lifestyles

Patrick Elf,Birgitta Gatersleben,Ian Christie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02699

IF: 3.8

2019-01-31

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract:Positive spillover occurs when changes in one behavior influence changes in subsequent behaviors. Evidence for such spillover and an understanding of when and how it may occur are still limited. This paper presents findings of a 1-year longitudinal behavior change project led by a commercial retailer in the United Kingdom and Ireland to examine behavior change and potential spillover of pro-environmental behavior, and how this may be associated with changes in environmental identity and perceptions of ease and affordability as well as perceptions of how participation in the project has helped support behavior change. We draw on both quantitative and qualitative data. Study 1 examines quantitative data from the experimental and a matched control group. Study 2 reports qualitative findings from a follow up interview study with participants of the experimental group. As expected, we found significant changes in reported pro-environmental behavior and identity in the experimental group as well as some indications of behavioral spillover. These changes were not significantly associated with changes in environmental identity. The interviews suggested that group dynamics played an important role in facilitating a sense of efficacy and promoting sustained behavior change and spillover. Moreover, the support by a trusted entity was deemed to be of crucial importance.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Spillover in the context of forced behaviour change: observations from a naturalistic time-series study

Sebastian Isbanner,Jennifer Algie,Nina Reynolds

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2020.1865431

IF: 4.707

2021-02-05

Journal of Marketing Management

Abstract:The paper investigates spillover in the pro-environmental context of Australian consumers' transition to using reusable bags, and explores its implications for other related environmental behaviours. This study uses a natural time-series design (pre, during and post change measures) to examine a real-world instance of a forced behaviour change incorporating changes in people's grocery shopping habits and possible subsequent behaviours. The study examines attitudes and behaviours including spillover, environmental lifestyle and moral licencing before (n = 200), during (n = 342) and after (n = 346) the phase out of single-use plastic bags. The definition, operationalisation, and measurement of spillover are also explored. Despite conflicting evidence from previous research, our findings suggest that a forced behaviour change can incidentally result in changes in subsequent related behaviours.

management,business
When and How does in‐role pro‐environmental behavior spill over to extra‐role behavior: Two experimental studies in the retail and education industries

Wenjing Guo,Kerrie Unsworth,Christian Bretter,Matthew Davis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3782

2024-04-30

Business Strategy and the Environment

Abstract:By integrating theories of goal proximity and crowding‐out, this research investigates how and when employees' performance of in‐role pro‐environmental behaviors will spill over to future engagement in extra‐role pro‐environmental behaviors. Using two experiments with employees from the retail (N = 338) and education (N = 448) industries, we found a conditional positive spillover effect, mediated by pro‐environmental goal commitment. More specifically, when employees with low intrinsic pro‐environmental motivation received feedback that they had progressed in their in‐role pro‐environmental performance, their extra‐role pro‐environmental behavior intentions increased due to an increased commitment to the pro‐environmental goal. However, when employees had high intrinsic pro‐environmental motivation, this spillover effect was negative (Study 1) or non‐significant (Study 2). To summarize, the positive spillover effect only occurs when employees are not highly intrinsically motivated. Our findings uncover a missing piece in organizational environmental management literature and carry important implications for employee‐oriented initiatives.

management,business,environmental studies
From past to present (for a better future): The moderating role of cognitive mindset on spillover effects in environmental behaviors

Federica Spaccatini,Paolo Riva,Juliette Richetin,Egle Porcelli,Luca Pancani,Roberta Capellini,Simona Sacchi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02917-2

IF: 2.8

2022-02-25

Current Psychology

Abstract:Abstract Research literature about the environmental spillover effect produced mixed results, revealing that an initial pro-environmental behavior (PEB) is likely to promote either other PEBs (i.e., positive spillover) or pro-environmental inactions and harming behaviors (i.e., negative spillover). Such inconsistency suggests a possible crucial role of moderating variables. In two experimental studies (N Study 1 = 141, N Study 2 = 124), we investigated whether the recall of past environmental behavior (water-saving vs. water-wasting) affects future intention to perform PEBs (Study 1) and actual PEBs (Study 2), depending on participants’ cognitive mindset (manipulated in Study 1 and measured in Study 2). Results showed that the cognitive mindset is a significant moderator of spillover effects. Compared to a holistic one, an analytical mindset is more likely to result in a greater willingness to engage in future PEBs (Study 1) and actual PEB (Study 2) when past PEB is salient. The main contributions of the studies, limitations and possible future research directions are discussed.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Spillover Benefits: Emphasizing Different Benefits of Environmental Behavior and Its Effects on Spillover

Ellen Van Der Werff,Linda Steg

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02347

IF: 3.8

2018-12-13

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract:To reduce environmental problems, people need to consistently engage in pro-environmental behaviors. Many environmentally friendly actions not only benefit the environment, but can also save money. Research suggests that emphasizing monetary benefits of pro-environmental behavior may hinder positive spillover to other pro-environmental behaviors. Yet, it is unclear why and under which circumstances this is the case. We propose that spillover effects depend on how emphasizing different types of benefits affects environmental self-identity, as a stronger environmental self-identity is more likely to lead to other pro-environmental actions. We hypothesize that emphasizing monetary benefits of pro-environmental behavior is less likely to strengthen environmental self-identity than emphasizing environmental benefits, and therefore not likely to lead to positive spillover. We tested our hypotheses in four experiments. In Study 1, we found that emphasizing the environmental benefits of pro-environmental behavior strengthened environmental self-identity, and resulted in positive spillover compared to not emphasizing any benefits or emphasizing monetary benefits. However, these results were not replicated in Study 2 that included a larger student sample. Yet, Study 3, including a large sample of the general population, showed that emphasizing monetary benefits weakens environmental self-identity and thereby leads to less spillover than emphasizing environmental benefits or not emphasizing any benefits. Similarly, Study 4 suggests that emphasizing monetary benefits may weaken environmental self-identity and decrease positive spillover compared to emphasizing environmental benefits or no benefits. Our findings suggest that environmental self-identity is not easily influenced by emphasizing different types of benefits of behavior, and consequently, spillover behavior is not easily promoted or inhibited. Yet, emphasizing monetary benefits may be a risk in some cases, as it may inhibit positive spillover.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Compensatory and Catalyzing Beliefs: Their Relationship to Pro-environmental Behavior and Behavioral Spillover in Seven Countries

Stuart Capstick,Lorraine Whitmarsh,Nick Nash,Paul Haggar,Josh Lord

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00963

IF: 3.8

2019-05-21

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract:There is growing research interest in behavioral spillover and its potential for enabling more widespread lifestyle change than has typically been achieved through discrete behavioral interventions. There are some routes by which spillover could take place without conscious attention or explicit recognition of the connections between separate behaviors. However, in many cases there is an expectation that an individual will perceive behaviors to be conceptually related, specifically in terms of their compensatory (suppressing further action) or catalyzing (promoting further action) properties, as a prerequisite for both negative and positive spillover. Despite this, relatively little research has been carried out to assess the beliefs that may underpin spillover processes as held by individuals themselves, or to measure these directly. We develop and evaluate a survey-based instrument for this purpose, doing so in a sample of seven countries worldwide: Brazil, China, Denmark, India, Poland, South Africa, and the United Kingdom (approx. 1,000 respondents per country). This approach allows us to assess these measures and to compare findings between countries. As part of this, we consider the connections between beliefs about behavioral relationships, and other key variables such as pro-environmental identity and personal preferences. We observe higher levels of endorsement of compensatory beliefs than previous research, and even higher levels of endorsement of novel items assessing catalyzing beliefs. For the first time, we present evidence of the validity of such measures with respect to comparable constructs, and in relation to people's consistency across different types of behaviors. We reflect on the implications of considering the relationships between behaviors in the context of people's subjective beliefs and offer recommendations for developing this line of research in the broader context of spillover research and within a cross-cultural framework.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Putting Your Money Where Your Mouth Is: An Experimental Test of Pro-Environmental Spillover From Reducing Meat Consumption to Monetary Donations

Amanda R. Carrico,Kaitlin T. Raimi,Heather Barnes Truelove,Brianne Eby

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517713067

2017-06-21

Environment and Behavior

Abstract:Psychological studies testing behavioral spillover—the notion that behavior change resulting from an intervention affects subsequent similar behaviors—has resulted in conflicting findings in the environmental domain. This study sought to further demarcate the spillover process by asking participants to engage in a difficult first pro-environmental behavior, reducing red meat consumption, for either health or environmental reasons. Evidence of spillover was tested via a subsequent monetary donation to an environmental organization. While there was no evidence of spillover for those in the green behavior condition, those in the health behavior condition were less likely to donate relative to controls. There was evidence that pro-environmental behavior led to an increase in environmental concern. In turn, environmental concern was associated with an increased likelihood of donating. Environmental concern may, thus, be one route to positive spillover in some subsets of the population.

psychology, multidisciplinary,environmental studies
Rationalizing Inconsistent Consumer Behavior. Understanding Pathways That Lead to Negative Spillover of Pro-environmental Behaviors in Daily Life

Lieke Dreijerink,Michel Handgraaf,Gerrit Antonides

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.583596

IF: 3.8

2021-05-17

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract:Ideally, pro-environmental consumer behavior leads to a lower impact on the environment. However, due to negative behavioral spillovers environmentally friendly behavior could lead to an overall higher environmental impact if subsequent environmentally unfriendly behavior occurs. In this exploratory interview study we focused on two pathways leading to negative spillover: a psychological path (perceived effort, moral licensing) and an economic path (rebound effects). We wanted to gain insight into people’s motivations to behave environmentally unfriendly and to explore people’s level of awareness of both pathways. Our results indicate that pro-environmental behaviors that are associated with higher effort are performed less frequently, and that when people do not perform these behaviors they associate them with higher effort levels. When people perceive behaviors as more effortful they increasingly seem to use arguments to motivate and rationalize why performing the behavior is difficult or impossible. Moreover, we found that although some people can imagine that moral licensing and rebound effects could occur and can provide examples from their own lives, most people assess these concepts as not rational. People seem unaware of the relation between a first pro-environmental behavior (PEB) and a subsequent behavior, and therefore inconsistencies in behavior go unnoticed. As people are good at rationalizing why they do not perform specific PEBs, they in general feel satisfied with their own pro-environmental actions. In order to discourage negative spillovers, we describe a number of approaches and research ideas aimed at taking away the grounds for rationalization.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Analyzing spillovers from food, energy and water conservation behaviors using insights from systems perspective

Pranay Kumar,Holly Caggiano,Cara Cuite,Frank A. Felder,Rachael Shwom

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2022.41

2023-01-24

Behavioural Public Policy

Abstract:Spillover effects are considered important in evaluating the impacts of food, energy and water (FEW) conservation behaviors for limiting global greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. Failure to account for all possible spillovers, or indirect and unintended results of an intervention, not only obscures valuable information pertaining to the dynamic interactions across domains but also results in biased estimates. In this study, we first systematically reviewed articles that investigate the idea that the performance of one pro-environmental behavior influences the conduct of subsequent behaviors(s) from the FEW domains. From our review of 48 studies in the last decade, we note that a big part of the discussion on spillover concerns the nature and direction of causal relationships between individual FEW conservation behaviors. We identify a critical gap in the literature regarding the distinction between spillover effects caused by the interventions as distinct from those caused by the primary behaviors. Next, we conducted a quantitative meta-analysis of the reviewed empirical studies to find a modest but overall positive spillover effect. Finally, we reviewed the theoretical and methodological plurality in the FEW spillover literature using a systemic thinking lens to summarize what is already known and identify future challenges and research opportunities with significant policy implications.
Does perceived similarity of pro-environmental behaviors lead to behavioral spillover?

Michel Handgraaf,Gerrit Antonides,L. Dreijerink

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frbhe.2023.1226590

2023-09-29

Abstract:Similarity of pro-environmental behaviors is described as a moderator of behavioral spillover: when behaviors are perceived as similar positive spillover would be more likely. However, how people perceive similarity is unclear and therefore, the exact role that similarity plays in the spillover process is uncertain. In a survey (n = 1,536) we investigated how people clustered a variety of pro-environmental behaviors and why. Moreover, we explored potential spillovers between people's current and desired behaviors. People appeared to mainly cluster behaviors according to domains (such as energy, mobility) in addition to other categorization types. Furthermore, positive spillovers from actual to desired behavior occurred both within and between domains. In other words, similarity did not seem to play an important role in predicting spillover. In general, people who clustered behaviors into more different categories had a stronger overall desire to behave pro-environmentally than people who used fewer clusters.

Psychology,Environmental Science
Cognitive Accessibility as a New Factor in Proenvironmental Spillover: Results From a Field Study of Household Food Waste Management

Nicole Sintov,Sally Geislar,Lee V. White

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517735638

2017-11-10

Environment and Behavior

Abstract:An emerging body of literature has contributed to understanding behavioral spillover; however, a limited range of behaviors and psychological pathways have been studied. The current study investigates whether starting to compost, a relatively difficult behavior receiving limited attention in the spillover literature, results in spillover to household waste prevention behaviors, including food, energy, and water waste prevention. It also tests cognitive accessibility as a new mediator in the spillover process, and advances an integrative process model to address methodological inconsistencies in the spillover literature. Data are from a 2015 longitudinal field experiment to increase composting. Participants ( N = 284) were residents of Costa Mesa, California, who received a structural intervention (i.e., curbside organic waste bins) and procedural information about composting. Positive spillover was observed. Additionally, cognitive accessibility partially mediated the relationship between composting and energy and water waste–prevention behaviors. Future research should adopt a consistent definition of spillover and explore additional pathways.

psychology, multidisciplinary,environmental studies

Proenvironmental behaviour spillover

Meta-analysis of pro-environmental behaviour spillover

Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and theoretical framework

Spillover effects in environmental behaviors, across time and context: a review and research agenda

More Green Than Gray? Toward a Sustainable Overview of Environmental Spillover Effects: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis (Preprint)

Climate-relevant behavioural spillover : A review of the literature

Pro-environmental spillover in consumer behavior: existence and drivers

Spillover between pro-environmental behaviours: The role of resources and perceived similarity

Positive spillover: The result of attitude change

Reflecting on Behavioral Spillover in Context: How Do Behavioral Motivations and Awareness Catalyze Other Environmentally Responsible Actions in Brazil, China, and Denmark?

Facilitating Positive Spillover Effects: New Insights From a Mixed-Methods Approach Exploring Factors Enabling People to Live More Sustainable Lifestyles

Spillover in the context of forced behaviour change: observations from a naturalistic time-series study

When and How does in‐role pro‐environmental behavior spill over to extra‐role behavior: Two experimental studies in the retail and education industries

From past to present (for a better future): The moderating role of cognitive mindset on spillover effects in environmental behaviors

Spillover Benefits: Emphasizing Different Benefits of Environmental Behavior and Its Effects on Spillover

Compensatory and Catalyzing Beliefs: Their Relationship to Pro-environmental Behavior and Behavioral Spillover in Seven Countries

Putting Your Money Where Your Mouth Is: An Experimental Test of Pro-Environmental Spillover From Reducing Meat Consumption to Monetary Donations

Rationalizing Inconsistent Consumer Behavior. Understanding Pathways That Lead to Negative Spillover of Pro-environmental Behaviors in Daily Life

Analyzing spillovers from food, energy and water conservation behaviors using insights from systems perspective

Does perceived similarity of pro-environmental behaviors lead to behavioral spillover?

Cognitive Accessibility as a New Factor in Proenvironmental Spillover: Results From a Field Study of Household Food Waste Management