Nord Stream 2: It's Time to Change Perspective

J. Perović,Maria Shagina
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3929/ETHZ-B-000479318
2021-04-01
Abstract:amidst rising tensions between Russia and the West due to Russia’s annexation of the Crimean peninsula and its military intervention in eastern Ukraine. Immediately after the project was signed, it triggered European and transatlantic debates about the pipeline’s necessity and its larger geopolitical implications. Proponents of Nord Stream 2 pointed to the need for more gas imports due to falling domestic production and the volatilities of supplies. In the case of Germany, the most adamant supporter and through its companies Uniper and Wintershall Dea also a key stakeholder in Nord Stream 2, political motives played a large role as well: Berlin considers energy an important link to Russia in light of the deteriorating relationship of the two countries. For the opponents – the US, Poland and Ukraine being the most vocal – Nord Stream 2 contradicts the EU’s stated objective on diversification of supply sources and undermines Europe’s energy security. The gas project has also raised legitimate concerns about its compatibility with the EU’s sanctions policy against Russia. The Russian regime’s increased repression against the political opposition, including the poisoning and imprisonment of Alexei Navalny, has recently strengthened the camp of those who advocate tightening sanctions against Russia, including calls for an immediate halt to the construction of Nord Stream 2. Moreover, the coronavirus pandemic has galvanized the EU’s commitNord Stream 2: It’s Time to Change Perspective
Business,Political Science,Environmental Science,Economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?