Abstract:Subject. The article considers the influence of the “Nord Stream 2” pipeline on the ecosystem of the Baltic Sea. The ecosystem services of natural systems, in particular aquatic systems are expensive (according to some estimates, they exceed the global GDP). Their quality is rapidly deteriorating, especially in regions experiencing significant anthropogenic impacts. One of such regions is the Baltic Sea. The polluter-pays principle is becoming more popular in international relations. Evidence proving that the pipeline has no negative effect on the environment confirms the fact that there are no grounds for applying this principle to “Nord Stream 2”. Purpose. To show that “Nord Stream 2” does not pose any significant threat to the sea-water landscapes and does not cause any significant degradation of their ecosystem services. Methods. The study simulates the future state of aquatic ecosystems after the construction of the pipeline. It also analyses the structure of ecosystem services provided by the aquatic landscapes of the Baltic Sea based on available assessments of the ecosystem services of aquatic systems in other regions. Results. For most ecosystem services provided by the aquatic landscapes of the Baltic Sea, the impact of the pipeline is insignificant and/or appears exclusively along its route and at the points of its entry (Ust-Luga) and exit (Greifswald, Germany). In some cases, this has both a negative and a positive impact, for example, when it comes to the living conditions of certain species or as a recreational service. A significant degradation of ecosystem services provided by the aquatic systems of the Baltic Sea and, as a consequence, a significant decrease in their cost is not expected to happen due to the impact of the “Nord Stream 2” pipeline. Conclusions. The environmental conditions in the Baltic Sea arouse a lot of concern. Russia contributes to their deterioration, in particular, to the eutrophication of the sea. However, the “Nord Stream 2” pipeline has little to do with this. What is more, in some cases it has a positive direct or indirect impact on the sea-water landscapes.

Landscapes of Paradox: Public Discourses and Policies in Poland's Relationship With the Nord Stream Pipeline

Nord Stream 2: It's Time to Change Perspective

Germany and Nord Stream 2: evolution and end of an incongruous policy

Economic and geopolitical aspects of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline

The Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline and Germany’s relationship with Russia

Unclear and present danger: Russia’s geoeconomics and the Nord Stream II pipeline

Germany’s Position Concerning the Nord Stream-2 Pipeline in the Context of the European Union’s Energy Security

The Impact of the Launch of the Nord Stream 2 Gas Pipeline on the Political Situation in the EU and Ukraine

Impact of large infrastructure facilities on sea-water landscapes based on the example of “Nord Stream 2”

Gas from the South, Not from Russia: The Possibility of Distributing Natural Gas from the Eastern Mediterranean to Poland and Central Europe

Engaged but constrained. Assessing EU actorness in the case of Nord Stream 2

THE PLACE OF ENERGY DIPLOMACY IN FOREIGN POLICY OF UKRAINE

Offshore Energy Development in Poland—Social and Economic Dimensions

Too little, too late? US sanctions against Nord Stream 2 and the transatlantic relationship

The Role of Polish Local Ports on the Central Baltic Coast in the Development of Offshore Wind Farms

The EU Energy Transition in a Geopoliticizing World

Environmental impact of the explosion of the Nord Stream pipelines

A Legal Framework for Energy-Conscious Urban Planning in Poland and Germany

The politics of Estonia’s offshore wind energy programme: Discourse, power and marine spatial planning

"We rather not connect trade to politics, let alone geopolitics" – The changing role of Russia as a landscape pressure for zero-carbon energy transitions

Nord stream 2, geopolitical conflicts and energy security: Evidence from EU regions