Abstract:The article establishes that the availability of fuel and energy resources becomes a tool of powerful influence in the international arena. When researching the mentioned problems, the significant influence of Russian capital and joint projects on the processes of formation and adoption of foreign policy decisions, changes in the vector of foreign state policy in lobbying interests by Russia is shown. The work proves that the exporting state builds its foreign policy from a position of strength and protects national interests through strategic and tactical manipulations (regulation of energy market prices in the interests of partner countries; creation of conditions for artificial deficit; use of energy dependence of importing countries for lobbying interests in foreign policy or coercion into strategically disadvantageous alliances). The political prerequisites and specifics of the positioning of the USA, EU member states and Ukraine in terms of the construction and commissioning of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline are analysed, the possible impact on the state of European security and the consequences for Ukraine are determined. The behaviour strategy and state policy of supporters and opponents within the framework of project implementation are outlined. It is established that support for the launch of the gas pipeline by Germany, as a key player of the EU, especially during military operations on the territory of Ukraine, may lead to a change in positions in the format of the alliance's functioning. In Ukraine, the launch of the Nord Stream-2 gas pipeline is a direct threat to national interests and the integrity of state borders, as the challenges and threats are both economic (blocking gas supplies, limiting the volume of gas transit through the territory of U kraine) and geopolitical in nature (being at the intersection of spheres of influence EU and NATO Ukraine must balance and adjust the vector of foreign policy).

Nord stream 2, geopolitical conflicts and energy security: Evidence from EU regions

Economic and geopolitical aspects of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline

Impact of different geopolitical factors on the energy transition: The role of geopolitical threats, geopolitical acts, and geopolitical risks

The Impact of the Launch of the Nord Stream 2 Gas Pipeline on the Political Situation in the EU and Ukraine

Does geopolitical uncertainty matter for the diffusion of clean energy?

Geopolitical Risk as a Determinant of Renewable Energy Investments

Do geopolitical risks facilitate the global energy transition? Evidence from 39 countries in the world

Germany’s Position Concerning the Nord Stream-2 Pipeline in the Context of the European Union’s Energy Security

Do geopolitical and energy security risks influence carbon dioxide emissions? Empirical evidence from European Union countries

Unclear and present danger: Russia’s geoeconomics and the Nord Stream II pipeline

Nord Stream 2: It's Time to Change Perspective

Geopolitical risk, climate risk and energy markets: A dynamic spillover analysis

Navigating the nexus: Geopolitical risk, fossil energy prices, and European utility stock returns - Implications for environmental management and energy security in a conflict-ridden global landscape

The EU Energy Transition in a Geopoliticizing World

Heterogeneity of the Impact of Geopolitical Events on Energy Trade: An Empirical Study Based on Regression Discontinuity Design

The impact of financial development and geopolitical risk on renewable energy consumption: evidence from emerging markets

Asymmetric impacts of climate policy uncertainty, investor sentiment on energy prices and renewable energy consumption: Evidence from NARDL and wavelet coherence

Does Geopolitics Have an Impact on Energy Trade? Empirical Research on Emerging Countries

In energy diplomacy with Europe, Russia comes out on top

For whom the bell tolls. A spatial analysis of the renewable energy transition determinants in Europe in light of the Russia-Ukraine war

Foreign Policy Alignment and Russia's Energy Weapon