International law principles of continental shelf delimitation and Sino-Japanese East China Sea disputes

Ying Cai
Abstract:Title of Dissertation: International Law Principles of Continental Shelf Delimitation and the Sino-Japanese East China Sea Disputes Degree: MSc The continental shelf is rich in natural resources, especially the extensive oil and gas reserves. The disputes of continental shelf delimitation between China and Japan in the East China Sea are not only over the ownership of the Senkaku Islands (or Diaoyu Islands), but also the application of international law principles. Japan has based its claim on the principle of equidistance; China on natural prolongation. The provisions of the Continental Shelf Convention and UNCLOS governing the delimitations of the continental shelf are relatively imprecise. This dissertation will examine the relevant international law principles, such as the equidistance, and equity principles. It is intended to discuss the interrelationships between these principles and special circumstances, relevant circumstances, and natural prolongation as well. The dissertation also observes the contemporary landmark cases such as the North Sea Continental Shelf Cases, Tunisia-Libya Continental Shelf case, Libya-Malta Continental Shelf case and so on. Finally, the dissertation attempts to resolve the dispute over the continental shelf delimitation between China and Japan in the East China Sea in light of the abovementioned relevant international law principles. Sitting at the crossroads of politics, law and technical knowledge, maritime delimitation appears as a multi-faceted subject, and the principles should be optimised in relative terms. The claims of Japan and China should therefore be optimised; and it is submitted that they can be reconciled together if both states are willing to resolve disputes equitably.
Law,Geography
What problem does this paper attempt to address?