Abstract:Over the last decade proposal success rates in the fundamental sciences have dropped significantly. Astronomy and related fields funded by NASA and NSF are no exception. Data across agencies show that this is not principally the result of a decline in proposal merit (the proportion of proposals receiving high rankings is largely unchanged), nor of a shift in proposer demographics (seniority, gender, and institutional affiliation have all remained unchanged), nor of an increase (beyond inflation) in the average requested funding per proposal, nor of an increase in the number of proposals per investigator in any one year. Rather, the statistics are consistent with a scenario in which agency budgets for competed research are flat or decreasing in inflation-adjusted dollars, the overall population of investigators has grown, and a larger proportion of these investigators are resubmitting meritorious but unfunded proposals. This White Paper presents statistics which support this conclusion, as well as recent research on the time cost of proposal writing versus that of producing publishable results. We conclude that an aspirational proposal success rate of 30-35% would still provide a healthily competitive environment for researchers, would more fully utilize the scientific capacity of the community's facilities and missions, and provide relief to the funding agencies who face the logistics of ever-increasing volumes of proposals.

'Shrugging off failure is hard': the $400-million grant setback that shaped the Smithsonian lead scientist's career

Early-career setback and future career impact

I was denied tenure — how do I cope?

Keeping in touch with the road not taken

Chinese scientists say funding shake-up has made it harder to win grants

Firmly Planted, Always Moving

Mid-career pitfall of consecutive success in science

U.S. giant telescopes imperiled by funding limit

Insights from four female scientists caught at the early-career crossroads

If at first you don't succeed

From a pocketful of rocks to scientific director of palaeontological research

I returned my neuroscience grant to devote my career to the climate crisis

What steps to take when funding starts to run out

How stepping out helped us tune in: finding space and time to think as an early career researcher

Larger or longer grants unlikely to push senior scientists towards high-risk, high-reward work

'Maybe I was never meant to be in science': how imposter syndrome seizes scientist mothers

"Bring it on": Explaining persistence in science at the intersection of identity and epistemology

How to keep research afloat during an administrative stint

Impact of Declining Proposal Success Rates on Scientific Productivity

Breaking Stereotypes: How Undergraduates' Life Experiences of Scientists Shape their Scopes of Possibility

FAIL Is Not a Four-Letter Word: A Theoretical Framework for Exploring Undergraduate Students’ Approaches to Academic Challenge and Responses to Failure in STEM Learning Environments