Shaking table test of prefabricated equipment cabins with a resilient steel frame at the bottom

Yulong Feng,Zhihao Zeng,Qing Jiang,Tianshu Zeng,Xun Chong,Junqi Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119019
IF: 5.582
2024-09-28
Engineering Structures
Abstract:A common steel frame is installed at the bottom of a prefabricated equipment cabin (PEC) in modular cabin-type substations to create ample space for equipment routing and maintenance. This paper proposes an earthquake-resilient steel frame instead of the common one, which uses replaceable buckling-restrained cover plates (BRCPs) to dissipate energy and disc spring bolts (DSBs) to provide restoring force. Two PECs with the common frame and the resilient frame were designed and produced, called the seismic model and baseline resilient model respectively. Two natural ground motions were selected, and the two models were tested at three earthquake levels. Then, one replacement resilient model and three parametric resilient models were loaded under maximum considered earthquakes. The test results showed that the acceleration amplification factor of the top of the two frames ranged between 1.17 and 2.09, indicating that the bottom frames amplified the acceleration of the PECs. The resilient frame proposed in this paper significantly reduced the acceleration amplification factor of the cabin roof relative to the cabin bottom. It should be noted that the equipment acceleration was greater than that of the prefabricated cabin, and the equipment acceleration in the resilient models was slightly greater than that in the seismic model, implying that further research is needed to control the response of equipment inside the prefabricated cabin. The resilient frame can guide structural damage to the replaceable core plate, without residual deformation after earthquakes, and has good rapid recovery after earthquakes. Reducing the preload of DSBs can effectively enhance the acceleration control effect of the structure while removing the core plate of the beam-column joint or column foot joint has less impact.
engineering, civil
What problem does this paper attempt to address?