Feasibility Assessment of Rapid Response EEG in the Identification of Nonconvulsive Seizures During Military Medical Air Transport

Joshua D Luster,William R Hoffman,Morgan Jordan,Kelsey Cacic,Zahari N Tchopev,Jess Anderson,William Gissendanner,Elijah Miranda,Tony Yuan,Adam Willis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usae471

2024-10-10

Abstract:Introduction: Traumatic brain injury often requires neurologic care and specialized equipment, not often found downrange. Nonconvulsive seizures (NCSs) and nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) occur in up to 30% of patients with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury and is associated with a 39% morbidity and an 18% mortality. It remains difficult to identify at bedside because of the heterogeneous clinical manifestations. The primary diagnostic tool is an electroencephalogram (EEG) which is large, requires an external power source, and requires a specialized technician and neurologist to collect and interpret the data. Rapid response EEG (rr-EEG) is an FDA-approved device that is pocket sized and battery powered and uses a disposable 10-electrode headset. Prior studies have demonstrated the noninferiority of rr-EEG in the identification of NCSE and NCS as compared to conventional EEG in hospitals. An unanswered question is whether rr-EEG could be used in the identification of NCSE and NCS by medics. Materials and methods: In conjunction with the Critical Care Air Transport (CCAT) team, a simulation was created and implemented on a CCAT training mission. The simulation team included a neurology resident, who oversaw the simulation, a pulmonary critical care fellow, an intensive care unit nurse, and a respiratory therapy. A survey was provided before and after the simulation. The team was expected to review the rr-EEG to make clinical decisions during ground transport, takeoff, and landing. The neurology resident monitored and recorded the team's ability to distinguish between NCS and a normal EEG. In between, the neurology resident monitored the quality of the EEG for potential interference and loss of quality. Results: The CCAT team was able to efficiently set up the rr-EEG on a patient manikin, correctly identify visual EEG wave forms of a patient in NCS, and utilize the proprietary audio program of a simulated patient in NCS. The team reported that the device was easily set up in the environment, and the data were interpretable despite vibration, aircraft auditory and electrical noise, and the ergonomics of the aircraft medical section. Conclusions: This pilot study has validated a potentially revolutionary technology in medical transport. The rr-EEG technology is measurably user-friendly and will improve patient outcomes. This device and simulation can reduce time to an EEG by hours to days allowing for immediate treatment and intervention, which can significantly reduce morbidity and mortality.