Rapid-Response Electroencephalography in Seizure Diagnosis and Patient Care: Lessons From a Community Hospital

Eleanor Eberhard,Samuel R. Beckerman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/jnn.0000000000000715
2023-09-10
Journal of Neuroscience Nursing
Abstract:Nonconvulsive seizures (NCSs) are prevalent among critically ill patients and patients with recent convulsive seizures, with a reported incidence of 8% to 20% in the intensive care unit (ICU) population. 1 Frequently, NCSs can go undetected at the bedside because of subtle clinical symptoms, but most can be diagnosed with electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring. 2,3 Current guidelines from multiple professional societies support prompt evaluation of patients using EEG after convulsive status epilepticus, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and acute brain injuries (eg, traumatic brain injury, stroke) that lead to altered mental status and/or seizures. 4–6 Delays in obtaining EEGs are associated with decreased diagnostic yield and latency in administering antiseizure medications, which may lead to increased seizure burden and decreased efficacy of antiseizure medications. 7–9 Conversely, prompt diagnosis and treatment may be neuroprotective, improve patient prognosis, and reduce hospital or ICU length of stay (LOS). 10 Several factors contribute to delayed seizure recognition and hinder timely diagnosis and treatment. Although other training initiatives have shown that nursing staff can effectively recognize and monitor EEG patterns in continuous and long-term monitoring settings, this is still dependent on readily available EEG equipment. 11–14 A major contributor at many hospitals is limited access to rapid conventional EEGs. This is often due to cumbersome and expensive conventional EEG equipment that requires highly trained technicians. 15 In addition, fellowship-trained neurologists are needed to interpret conventional EEG tracings and guide diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. 15,16
nursing,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?