Abstract:Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery (sCAIS) for tooth-supported free-end dental implantation with the aid/and without the aid of fixation pins to secure the surgical template through comparison between planned, 3D printed guide position and placement implant position. Materials and methods: Thirty-two duplicated maxillary resin models were used in the present in vitro study. Digital planning was performed and fabrication of a surgical template that allowed implant placement on the distal extension edentulous site of the model (maxillary left side). A first optical scan was performed after fitting the surgical template on the model to assess the deviation at the surgical guide level. After placing implants in the model using the surgical guide, scan bodies were attached to the implants, and a second scan was performed to record the position of placed implants. The digital representations were later superimposed to the pre-operative scan and measurements of implant deviations were performed. Global (coronal and apical), horizontal (coronal and apical), depth and angular deviations were recorded between planned implant position, guide position, and placement implant position. Three-way ANOVA was used to compare implant location (#13, 14, and 15), fixation pin (with or without pin), and guide comparison (planned, guided, and placement). Results: Final implant placement based on the digital plan and based on the 3D printed guide were very similar except for depth deviation. Use of fixation pin had a statistically significant effect on the depth and angular deviation. Overall, without fixation pins and based on guide versus placement, mean global coronal (0.88 ± 0.36 mm), horizontal coronal (0.55 ± 0.32 mm), and apical (1.44 ± 0.75 mm), and angular deviations (4.28 ± 2.01°) were similar to deviations with fixation pins: mean global coronal (0.88 ± 0.36 mm); horizontal coronal (0.67 ± 0.22 mm) and apical (1.60 ± 0.69 mm); and angular deviations (4.53 ± 2.04°). Horizontal apical without pins (1.63 ± 0.69 mm) and with fixation pins (1.72 ± 0.70 mm) was statistically significant (p = 0.044). Depth deviation without pins (-0.5 ± 0.5 mm) and with fixation pins (-0.16 ± 0.62 mm) was also statistically significant (p = 0.005). Further analysis demonstrated that the final sleeve position on the 3D printed guide was on average 0.5 mm more coronal than the digital plan. Conclusions: The use of surgical guides with or without fixation pins can provide clinically acceptable outcomes in terms of accuracy in implant position. There was a statistically significant difference in the accuracy of implant position when utilizing fixation pins only for horizontal apical and depth deviation. Additionally, a statistically significant difference between the planned and the 3D printed surgical guide when considering the sleeve position was detected.

In-house CAD/CAM fabricated repositioning guide in maxillary repositioning after Le Fort I osteotomy

Accuracy of mandibular repositioning surgery using new technology: Computer-aided design and manufacturing customized surgical cutting guides and fixation plates

Randomized Clinical Trial of the Accuracy of Patient-Specific Implants Versus CAD/CAM Splints in Orthognathic Surgery.

Do patient-specific cutting guides and plates improve the accuracy of maxillary repositioning in hemifacial microsomia?

Accuracy of Intraoperative Measuring Guide and Conventional Surgical Guide in Anterior Implant Surgery: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

A Novel Method of Computer Aided Orthognathic Surgery Using Individual CAD/CAM Templates: a Combination of Osteotomy and Repositioning Guides.

An accuracy study of metal surgical template guide assisted mandibular osteotomy in craniofacial microsomia

A new approach of splint-less orthognathic surgery using a personalized orthognathic surgical guide system: A preliminary study.

Accuracy of the Modified Tooth-Supported 3D Printing Surgical Guides Based on CT, CBCT, and Intraoral Scanning in Maxillofacial Region: a Comparison Study

Accuracy of dental implant surgery with robotic position feedback and registration algorithm: An <i>in</i>-<i>vitro</i> study

Accuracy of flapless immediate implant placement in anterior maxilla using computer-assisted versus freehand surgery: A cadaver study

A Comparison of Accuracy among Different Approaches of Static‐guided Implant Placement in Patients Treated with Mandibular Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study

Comparison of the Accuracy of Maxillary Repositioning Between Using Splints and Templates in 2-Jaw Orthognathic Surgery

Accuracy of Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated Using Computer Numerical Control Milling for Edentulous Jaws: a Pilot Clinical Trial.

An in vitro study of the precision of CAD/CAM guides in the posterior area

The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery

The Comparison of 3D Printing Surgical Guide and Traditional Occlusal Splint in the Treatment with Facial Asymmetry Cases

Accuracy of Patient-Specific Implants Versus CAD/CAM Splints with the Mandible-First Approach in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery for Skeletal Class II Malocclusion.

A CAD/CAM Maxillary Guiding for Osteotomy, Drilling and Maxillary Positioning in Orthognathic Surgery: Accuracy Analysis.

Comparison of accuracy between single posterior immediate and delayed implants placed using computer guided implant surgery and a digital laser printed surgical guide: A clinical investigation

Accuracy of a Chairside, Fused Deposition Modeling Three-Dimensional-printed, Single Tooth Surgical Guide for Implant Placement: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial