Abstract:A fundamental feature of the human brain is its capacity to learn novel motor skills. This capacity requires the formation of vastly different visuomotor mappings. Using a grid navigation task, we investigated whether training variability would enhance the flexible use of a visuomotor mapping (key-to-direction rule), leading to better generalization performance. Experiments 1 and 2 show that participants trained to move between multiple start-target pairs exhibited greater generalization to both distal and proximal targets compared to participants trained to move between a single pair. This finding suggests that limited variability can impair decisions even in simple tasks without planning. In addition, during the training phase, participants exposed to higher variability were more inclined to choose options that, counterintuitively, moved the cursor away from the target while minimizing its actual distance under the constrained mapping, suggesting a greater engagement in model-based computations. In Experiments 3 and 4, we showed that the limited generalization performance in participants trained with a single pair can be enhanced by a short period of variability introduced early in learning or by incorporating stochasticity into the visuomotor mapping. Our computational modeling analyses revealed that a hybrid model between model-free and model-based computations with different mixing weights for the training and generalization phases, best described participants' data. Importantly, the differences in the model-based weights between our experimental groups, paralleled the behavioral findings during training and generalization. Taken together, our results suggest that training variability enables the flexible use of the visuomotor mapping, potentially by preventing the consolidation of habits due to the continuous demand to change responses. The development of new motor skills often requires the learning of novel associations between actions and outcomes. These novel mappings can be flexible and generalize to new situations, or more local with narrow generalization, similar to stimulus-action associations. In a series of experiments using a navigation task, we showed that generalizable mappings are favored under a training variability regime, while local mappings with narrow generalization are developed in the absence of variability. Training variability was generated in our experiments either with multiple goals or with stochasticity in the action-outcome mapping, with both regimes leading to successful generalization. In addition, we showed that the benefits in generalization from training variability can be observed even when participants are subsequently exposed to no variability for a prolonged period of time. These results were best described by a mixture of model-free and model-based reinforcement learning algorithms, with different mixture weights for the training and generalization phases.

Anticipated variability increases generalization of predictive learning

Exposure to temporal variability promotes subsequent adaptation to new temporal regularities

Task-irrelevant phase but not contrast variability unlocks generalization in visual perceptual learning

The role of training variability for model-based and model-free learning of an arbitrary visuomotor mapping

Generalization in perceptual learning across stimuli and tasks

Cue Predictiveness and Uncertainty Determine Cue Representation During Visual Statistical Learning.

When stimulus variability accelerates the learning of task knowledge in adults and school-aged children

Feature Variability Determines Specificity and Transfer in Multiorientation Feature Detection Learning

Stimulus variability improves generalization following response inhibition training

Dissociable dynamic effects of expectation during statistical learning

Intermixed levels of visual search difficulty produce asymmetric probability learning

Expecting to integrate additional information improves averaging of experience

A bounded accumulation model of temporal generalization outperforms existing models and captures modality differences and learning effects

The impact of emotional valence on generalization gradients

Neural variability compresses with increasing belief precision during Bayesian inference

Computational processes of simultaneous learning of stochasticity and volatility in humans

Predictability and Variation in Language Are Differentially Affected by Learning and Production

Generalization and Memorization: the Bias Potential Model.

High-variability training does not enhance generalization in the prototype-distortion paradigm

Two determinants of dynamic adaptive learning for magnitudes and probabilities

Evidence for belief updating in decision-variable space: past decisions with finer granularity attract future ones more strongly