A bounded accumulation model of temporal generalization outperforms existing models and captures modality differences and learning effects

Nir Ofir,Ayelet N. Landau
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.15.616846
2024-10-17
Abstract:Multiple systems in the brain track the passage of time and can adapt their activity to temporal requirements (Paton & Buonomano, 2018). While the neural implementation of timing varies widely between neural substrates and behavioral tasks, at the algorithmic level many of these behaviors can be described as bounded accumulation (Balci & Simen, 2024). So far, from the range of temporal psychophysical tasks, the bounded accumulation model has only been applied to temporal bisection, in which participants are requested to categorize an interval as "long" or "short" (Balci & Simen, 2014; Ofir & Landau, 2022). In this work, we extend the model to fit performance in the temporal generalization task, in which participants are required to categorize an interval as being the same or different compared to a standard, or reference, duration (Wearden, 1992). Previous models of performance in this task focused on either the group level or performance of highly trained animals (Birngruber et al., 2014; Church & Gibbon, 1982; Wearden, 1992). Whether the same models can fit performance from a few hundreds of trials of single participants, necessary for comparing performance across experimental manipulations, has not been tested. A drift-diffusion model with two decision boundaries fits the data of single participants better than the previous models. We ran two experiments, one comparing performance between vision and audition and another examining the effect of learning. We found that decision boundaries can be modified independently: While the upper boundary was higher in vision compared to audition, the lower boundary decreased with learning in the task.
Neuroscience
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problems that this paper attempts to solve are: **How to extend the existing bounded accumulation model to adapt to time generalization tasks, and whether this model can better fit the data of a single participant under different experimental conditions**. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following points: 1. **Extension of model applicability**: The existing bounded accumulation model is mainly applied to the time bisection task, that is, participants need to judge whether a time interval is "short" or "long". The paper attempts to extend this model to time generalization tasks, in which participants need to judge whether a time interval is the same as or different from the standard time interval. 2. **Model performance evaluation**: Through experimental data, compare the performance of the extended bounded accumulation model (i.e., the double - boundary drift - diffusion model, DDM) with other existing models (such as the CG model, the MCG model, and the BSU model) in fitting the data of a single participant. 3. **Modal differences and learning effects**: Explore the influence of different sensory modalities (vision and audition) on time generalization tasks, and how the learning process affects task performance. ### Main research methods 1. **Experimental design**: - **Experiment 1**: Compare the time generalization performance under visual and auditory stimuli. - **Experiment 2**: Examine the influence of the learning effect on the performance of time generalization tasks. 2. **Model comparison**: - **CG model**: Assume that the decision boundaries are symmetrically distributed around the true standard time interval. - **MCG model**: Modify the CG model so that the standardization method of the decision variable depends on the objective duration of the current time interval. - **BSU model**: Allow the decision boundaries to be asymmetric and introduce a bias term to explain the deviation between individuals. - **DDM model**: Extend the bounded accumulation model and use the double - boundary drift - diffusion process to describe the decision - making process. ### Main results 1. **Model fitting effect**: The double - boundary drift - diffusion model (DDM) performs better than other models in fitting the data of a single participant. 2. **Modal differences**: Participants' performance in auditory tasks is significantly better than that in visual tasks. 3. **Learning effect**: With the learning of the task, the decision boundaries can be adjusted independently. For example, in visual tasks, the upper boundary is higher, and the lower boundary decreases with learning. ### Formula summary - **Decision rule of the CG model**: \[ -b < \frac{t - s}{s} < b \] where \( s \) is the standard memory, \( b \) is the decision boundary, and \( t \) is the time interval of the current trial. - **Decision rule of the MCG model**: \[ -b < \frac{t - s}{t} < b \] - **Decision function of the BSU model**: \[ P(\text{same} | t; b_1, b_2, \epsilon, k) = \Phi\left(\frac{b_2 - (t + \epsilon - s)}{k t}\right) - \Phi\left(\frac{b_1 - (t + \epsilon - s)}{k t}\right) \] - **Decision function of the DDM model**: \[ p(\text{same} | t; b_l, b_u, c) = \Phi\left(\frac{b_u - t}{c \sqrt{t}}\right) - \Phi\left(\frac{b_l - t}{c \sqrt{t}}\right) \] These formulas respectively describe the decision - making processes of different models in time generalization tasks, where \( \Phi \) represents the standard normal cumulative distribution function.