Abstract:Interval timing, the ability of animals to estimate the passage of time, is thought to involve diverse neural processes rather than a single central "clock" (Paton & Buonomano, 2018). Each of the different processes engaged in interval timing follows a different dynamic path, according to its specific function. For example, attention tracks anticipated events, such as offsets of intervals (Rohenkohl & Nobre, 2011), while motor processes control the timing of the behavioral output (De Lafuente et al., 2024). Hence, different processes provide complimentary perspectives on mechanisms of time perception. The temporal bisection task, where participants categorize intervals as "long" or "short", is thought to rely on the same mechanisms as other perceptual decisions (Balci & Simen, 2014). In line with this hypothesis, we previously described an EEG potential that tracks the formation of decision following the end of the timed interval (Ofir & Landau, 2022). Here, we track the dynamics of motor preparation to investigate the formation of decision within the timed interval. In contrast to typical perceptual decisions, where motor plans for all response alternatives are prepared simultaneously (Shadlen & Kiani, 2013), we find that different temporal decisions develop sequentially. While preparation for "long" responses was already underway before interval offset, no preparation was found for "short" responses. Furthermore, within intervals categorized as "long", motor preparation was stronger at interval offset for faster responses. Our findings shed light on the unique dynamics of temporal decisions and demonstrate the importance of considering neural activity in timing tasks from multiple perspectives.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore how motor preparation reflects the dynamic process of decision boundary crossing during the time - decision - making process, especially in the time bisection task. Specifically, researchers hope to reveal the relationship between time perception and decision formation by analyzing the brain activities of participants when making "long" or "short" judgments within different time intervals.
### Research Background and Problems
1. **Diversity of Time Perception**
- The time - perception ability of animals is considered to involve multiple neural processes rather than a single central "clock". Different processes follow different dynamic paths according to their specific functions. For example, attention tracks expected events (such as the end of a time interval), while motor processes control the timing of behavioral output (De Lafuente et al., 2024).
2. **Time Bisection Task**
- In the time bisection task, participants need to classify time intervals as "long" or "short". This task relies on the same mechanisms as other perceptual decisions (Balcı & Simen, 2014). Previous studies have shown that after the end of a time interval, EEG signals reflect the formation of decisions (Ofir & Landau, 2022).
3. **Dynamic Changes in Motor Preparation**
- Different from typical perceptual decisions, motor preparation in time decisions develops sequentially. Preparation for a "long" response has already begun before the end of the time interval, while there are no obvious signs of preparation for a "short" response. Moreover, in intervals classified as "long", faster responses show stronger motor preparation at the end of the time interval.
### Research Purposes
This study aims to directly investigate the process of time - evidence accumulation, especially by tracking the preparation of manual responses to reflect this process. Specifically, researchers focus on the following questions:
- **Temporal Dynamics of Motor Preparation**: How does motor preparation change over time within a time interval?
- **Reflection of Decision Boundary Crossing**: Does motor preparation reflect the crossing of decision boundaries, and if so, how?
- **Differences in Different Decisions**: Are there significant differences in motor preparation for "long" and "short" decisions?
Through the exploration of these questions, researchers hope to reveal the unique dynamics of time - decision - making and emphasize the importance of considering neural activities from multiple perspectives in time tasks.
### Method Overview
To answer the above questions, researchers used the time bisection task and recorded the EEG activities of participants. Particular attention was paid to the amplitude changes in the mu - beta frequency band (8 - 30 Hz), because this is considered a robust marker for preparing and executing motor commands (Pfurtscheller & Lopes Da Silva, 1999). By analyzing these data, researchers were able to track the motor preparation of participants within different time intervals, thus revealing the process of decision formation.
### Main Findings
- **Temporal Dynamics of Motor Preparation**: In the 1 - 2 - second time - interval blocks, mu - beta lateralization remained close to zero within the first second after the start of the time interval and then gradually increased, showing preparation for a "long" response.
- **Reflection of Decision Boundary Crossing**: For a "long" response, motor preparation had already significantly increased before the end of the time interval; while for a "short" response, there were no significant signs of motor preparation.
- **Differences in Different Decisions**: For a "long" response, faster reaction times were associated with stronger motor preparation, while no significant association was found in "short" responses.
These findings provide a new perspective for understanding the unique dynamics of time - decision - making and emphasize the importance of considering multiple aspects of neural activities in time tasks.