Abstract:Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Ahead of Print. BACKGROUND:Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) may be an alternative to biventricular pacing (BVP) for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We sought to compare the acute hemodynamic and ECG effects of LBBAP, BVP, and left bundle-optimized therapy CRT (LOT-CRT) in CRT candidates with advanced conduction disease.METHODS:In this multicenter study, 48 patients with either nonspecific interventricular conduction delay (n=29) or left bundle branch block (n=19) underwent acute hemodynamic testing to determine the change in left ventricular pressure maximal first derivative (LV dP/dtmax) from baseline atrial pacing to BVP, LBBAP, or LOT-CRT.RESULTS:Atrioventricular-optimized increases in LV dP/dtmaxfor LOT-CRT (mean, 25.8% [95% CI, 20.9%–30.7%]) and BVP (26.4% [95% CI, 20.2%–32.6%]) were greater than unipolar LBBAP (19.3% [95% CI, 15.0%–23.7%]) or bipolar LBBAP (16.4% [95% CI, 12.7%–20.0%];P≤0.005). QRS shortening was greater in LOT-CRT (29.5 [95% CI, 23.4–35.6] ms) than unipolar LBBAP (11.9 [95% CI, 6.1–17.7] ms), bipolar LBBAP (11.7 ms [95% CI, 6.4–17.0]), or BVP (18.5 [95% CI, 11.0–25.9] ms), allP≤0.005. Compared with patients with left bundle branch block, patients with interventricular conduction delay experienced less QRS reduction (P=0.026) but similar improvements in LV dP/dtmax(P=0.29). Bipolar LBBAP caused anodal capture in 54% of patients and resulted in less LV dP/dtmaximprovement than unipolar LBBAP (18.6% versus 23.7%;P<0.001). Subclassification of LBBAP capture (EHRA criteria) indicated LBBAP or LV septal pacing in 27 patients (56%) and deep septal pacing in 21 patients (44%). The hemodynamic benefit of adding left ventricular coronary vein pacing to LBBAP depended on baseline QRS duration (P=0.031) and success of LBBAP (P<0.004): LOT-CRT provided 14.5% (5.0%–24.1%) greater LV dP/dtmaximprovement and 20.8 (12.8–28.8) ms greater QRS shortening than LBBAP in subjects with QRS ≥171 ms and deep septal pacing capture type.CONCLUSIONS:In a CRT cohort with advanced conduction disease, LOT-CRT and BVP provided greater acute hemodynamic benefit than LBBAP. Subjects with wider QRS or deep septal pacing are more likely to benefit from the addition of a left ventricular coronary vein lead to implement LOT-CRT.REGISTRATION:URL:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04905290.

Conduction system pacing associated with reduced heart failure hospitalizations and all-cause mortality compared with traditional right ventricular pacing in the Medicare population

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing

Conduction system pacing compared with biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: Results from International Collaborative LBBAP Study (I-CLAS) Group

Cardiovascular imaging in conduction system pacing: What does the clinician need?

Conduction system pacing versus conventional pacing in patients undergoing atrioventricular node ablation: Nonrandomized, on-treatment comparison

Conduction System Stimulation to Avoid Left Ventricle Dysfunction

Is conduction system pacing more effective than right ventricular pacing in reducing atrial high-rate episodes in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction?

Conduction System Pacing versus Biventricular Pacing in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Reduction of Unnecessary Right Ventricular Pacing by Managed Ventricular Pacing and Search AV+ Algorithms in Pacemaker Patients: 12-Month Follow-Up Results of a Randomized Study.

Loss of capture of conduction system pacemaker caused by fibrosis surrounding the lead: a case report

Prognostic benefits of His‐Purkinje capture in physiological pacemakers for bradycardia

Clinical outcomes of conduction system pacing compared to biventricular pacing in patients with mid-range ejection fraction

Feasibility of Conduction System Pacing in Patients with Baseline Bundle Branch Block—A Single-Center Mid-Term Follow-Up Study

Sex differences outcomes in conduction system pacing for patients with typical left bundle branch block

Mid-term clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing compared to accurate right ventricular septal pacing

Multicenter Hemodynamic Assessment of the LOT-CRT Strategy: When Does Combining Left Bundle Branch Pacing and Coronary Venous Pacing Enhance Resynchronization?: Primary Results of the CSPOT Study

Clinical outcomes of His‐Purkinje conduction system pacing

Conduction system pacing, a European survey: insights from clinical practice

Efficacy of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Patients: Select Site - Cohort Study

Conduction system pacing versus biventricular pacing in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and electrical dyssynchrony

AV‐optimized conduction system pacing for treatment of AV dromotropathy: A randomized, cross‐over study