Abstract:Objectives to Background To compare electromechanical ventricular synchrony when pacing from different sites, including right ventricular apex pacing (RVAP), right ventricular septum pacing (RVSP), His bundle pacing (HBP), left bundle branch pacing (LBBP), and RVSP during unipolar pacing from the ring electrode of LBBP lead (RVSPring) in each patient and evaluate the correlations between electrophysiological characteristics and ventricular synchrony. Methods Twenty patients with complete atrioventricular block indicated for dual-chamber pacemaker implantation were included in the study. Unipolar pacing at different sites, including RVAP, RVSP, HBP, LBBP, and RVSPring, was successively performed in each patient. The pacing characteristics and echocardiogram parameters were collected and compared among intrinsic rhythm and pacing at different sites. Results Similar to HBP (114.84 +/- 18.67 ms), narrower paced QRSd was found in LBBP (116.15 +/- 11.60 ms) as compared to RVSPring (135.11 +/- 13.68 ms), RVSP (141.65 +/- 14.26 ms), and RVAP (160.15 +/- 19.35 ms) (p < .001). LBBP showed comparable pacing parameters to RVAP or RVSP and was significantly better than HBP, with maintained cardiac function. TS-12-SD was significantly improved in LBBP (41.80 +/- 20.97 ms) than RVAP (69.70 +/- 32.42 ms, p = .003) and RVSP (63.30.56 +/- 32.53 ms, p = .018) but similar to HBP (51.50 +/- 25.67 ms, p = .283) or RVSPring (57.80 +/- 25.65 ms, p = .198). Among these pacing strategies, negative values of interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD) were only identified in LBBP (-19.25 +/- 18.43 ms), significantly different from RVAP (35.00 +/- 30.72 ms), RVSP (22.85 +/- 22.05 ms), HBP (5.20 +/- 18.64 ms), and RVSPring (16.00 +/- 26.76 ms (all p < .05). Using Pearson's analysis, Sti-LVAT was positively correlated with QRS duration, IVMD, TS-12-SD, LVEDV, and LVESV, while a negative relationship could be observed for left ventricular ejection fraction. Conclusions His-Purkinje conduction system pacing (HPCSP) achieved better electrical and mechanical synchrony than conventional RV pacing. For interventricular synchrony, only LBBP initiated earlier LV activation than RV, in accordance with the right bundle branch block (RBBB) pattern of paced QRS during LBBP. Sti-LVAT might be a good parameter correlating with LV systolic function and mechanical synchrony.

Sex differences outcomes in conduction system pacing for patients with typical left bundle branch block

Comparison Of Synchronization Between Left Bundle Branch And His Bundle Pacing In Atrial Fibrillation Patients: An Intra-Patient-Controlled Study

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing

Electrophysiological Insights into Three Modalities of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients Indicated for Pacing Therapy

Resynchronization Effects and Clinical Outcomes During Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing with and Without Conduction System Capture.

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure and Left Bundle Branch Block

Clinical outcomes of conduction system pacing compared to biventricular pacing in patients with mid-range ejection fraction

Long-term efficacy of left bundle branch pacing and biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure complicated with left bundle branch block

Conduction system pacing associated with reduced heart failure hospitalizations and all-cause mortality compared with traditional right ventricular pacing in the Medicare population

Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing on Electrical Synchrony and Hemodynamics in Heart Failure Patients with Left Bundle Branch Block

Conduction system pacing compared with biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: Results from International Collaborative LBBAP Study (I-CLAS) Group

Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing for Acute Cardiac Resynchronization in Patients With Heart Failure

Relationship of Different Left Bundle Branch Pacing Sites and Clinical Outcomes in Heart Failure Patients

Conduction System Pacing versus Biventricular Pacing in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing with or Without Conduction System Capture in Heart Failure Models

Mechanical Synchrony and Myocardial Work in Heart Failure Patients with Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Comparison with Biventricular Pacing.

Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing vs. Right Ventricular Pacing for Atrioventricular Block

Electrocardiographic predictors of clinical outcomes in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy patients with left bundle branch area pacing cardiac resynchronization therapy

Evaluation of Electrophysiological Characteristics and Ventricular Synchrony: an Intrapatient-Controlled Study During His-Purkinje Conduction System Pacing Versus Right Ventricular Pacing.

Feasibility of Conduction System Pacing in Patients with Baseline Bundle Branch Block—A Single-Center Mid-Term Follow-Up Study

Is conduction system pacing more effective than right ventricular pacing in reducing atrial high-rate episodes in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction?