Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing on Electrical Synchrony and Hemodynamics in Heart Failure Patients with Left Bundle Branch Block

黄珍珍,梁义秀,汪菁峰,巩雪,肖子龙,王素华,宿燕岗,葛均波
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn113859-20220221-00034
2022-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To compare the acute effect of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) and biventricular pacing (BVP) on electrical synchrony and left ventricular (LV) hemodynamics in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB).Methods:Patients with heart failure complicated with LBBB who received cardiac resynchronization therapy(CRT)in Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital from September 2020 to March 2021 were enrolled.All patients received LBBP and BVP in a random crossover fashion.Electrical synchrony was evaluated with QRS duration and QRS area, and hemodynamic was assessed with the increase of the maximum rate of LV pressure increase (dP/dt max). Results:Eighteen patients were enrolled, including 8 in female and 10 in male, with an average age of (67.00±9.82)years(47-81 years). Both LBBP and BVP showed significant improvement in electrical synchrony and hemodynamics compared to baseline.Compared with BVP, LBBP achieved a larger reduction of QRS duration (-12.83 ms, 95% CI -20.24- -5.43 ms, P=0.002) as well as QRS area (-89.86 μVs, 95% CI -120.54- -59.17 μVs, P<0.001). LBBP achieved a significantly higher increase in LV dP/dt max than BVP (6.86%, 95% CI 3.11%-10.61%, P=0.001). Conclusion:Compared with BVP, LBBP delivered better improvement in electrical synchrony and acute hemodynamics in patients with heart failure and LBBB.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?