Abstract:His bundle pacing (HBP) improves heart failure (HF) in atrial fibrillation (AF) pacing–dependent patients with a potential for a progressively increased threshold. HBP with right ventricular pacing (RVP) as a backup is always the preferred choice; however, RVP may induce HF. His Purkinje system pacing (HPSP) includes HBP and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP). LBBAP maintains left ventricular synchrony but has not been proven to be safe over the long term. We assessed the feasibility and safety of both HBP and LBBAP in AF pacing–dependent patients and compared the parameters of both leads at baseline and at the 6-month follow-up. A total of 16 AF patients in our center, who successfully attempted both HBP and LBBAP, were prospectively enrolled unless only one of these treatment statuses was attained. The electrocardiogram characteristics, leading parameters, echocardiography results, and clinical outcomes were assessed. Thirteen out of 16 patients achieved both HBP and LBBAP successfully in the same AF pacing–dependent patients. In symptomatic HF patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (n = 10), the left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) was reduced from 51.8 ± 4.4 to 48.3 ± 3.1 mm (p = 0.01) with the use of diuretics, either reduced or stopped (n = 7). During the follow-up, one patient in the group without HF had an increased HBP threshold and developed HF symptoms. His HF symptoms disappeared when switched into LBBAP mode. Another patient in the group with HF got his LVEF elevated by HBP for 3 months by utilizing left bundle branch block(LBBB)correction and continued to increase when switched into LBBAP for another 3 months due to an increased HBP correction threshold. The average unipolar pacing threshold of LBBAP was lower than that of HBP. No perforation or dislodgement occurred in our study. Both HBP and LBBAP could be attempted successfully in the same AF patients when one of the two modes could be adopted and switched according to the clinical feasibility. Compared with HBP, LBBAP yielded better and more stable parameters but showed comparable effects during the 6-month follow-up.

Feasibility of Conduction System Pacing in Patients with Baseline Bundle Branch Block—A Single-Center Mid-Term Follow-Up Study

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing

Electrophysiological Insights into Three Modalities of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients Indicated for Pacing Therapy

Feasibility and Outcomes of Upgrading to Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients with Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy and Infranodal Atrioventricular Block.

Feasibility and Safety of Both His Bundle Pacing and Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: Intermediate Term Follow-Up

A Multi-Lead ECG Monitoring Combined with a Programmed Intracavitary ECG to Complete LBBaP Pacing: Study Protocol for a Single-center, Prospective Study

Long-term Safety and Feasibility of Permanent His Bundle Pacing

The Feasibility and Safety of Left Bundle Branch Pacing Vs. Right Ventricular Pacing after Mid-Long-term Follow-Up: a Single-Centre Experience

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure and Left Bundle Branch Block

Durability of left bundle branch area pacing

Bilateral Bundle Branch Area Pacing to Achieve Physiological Conduction System Activation.

Feasibility and stability of left bundle branch pacing in patients after prosthetic valve implantation

Conduction system pacing, a European survey: insights from clinical practice

His bundle pacing in nodal versus infranodal atrioventricular block: a mid-term follow-up study

Feasibility and Efficacy of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients Indicated for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Left bundle branch area pacing: A promising modality for cardiac resynchronization therapy

Feasibility and Safety of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease

Conduction system pacing compared with biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: Results from International Collaborative LBBAP Study (I-CLAS) Group

B-PO01-022 EXPLORING THE OPTIMAL PACING MODALITY IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH-GRADE ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK AND RIGHT BUNDLE BRANCH BLOCK PATTERN: A PILOT STUDY

Electrogram-guided Bachmann bundle area pacing to correct interatrial block: Initial experience, safety, and feasibility

Clinical Features and Outcomes of Long-Term Lead Performance by Left Bundle Branch Pacing