Abstract:Introduction Although atrial septal pacing has been reported to reduce atrial fibrillation (AF) burden, there is less evidence regarding its effect on the prevention of permanent AF and the improvement of long-term clinical outcomes. However, Bachmann's bundle pacing (BBp), which features P-wave morphology similar to sinus rhythm and shortened P-wave duration (PWD), was reported to significantly reduce permanent AF recurrences and occurrences compared with right atrial appendage pacing (RAAp) and non-specific right septal pacing. Purpose Possible mechanisms for AF suppression with BBp are that fast inter-atrial conduction through BB decreases global atrial activation time and the dispersion of the overall atrial refractoriness, and it prevents the decrease in left ventricular filling and increase in left atrial pressure associated with delayed left atrial contraction. Intra-and inter-atrial conduction during BBp was evaluated using longitudinal bi-atrial strain. Methods In patients with successful BBp implantation defined by electrocardiographic criteria using SelectSecure pacing lead and C315 delivery catheter (Medtronic, Inc), both left atrium (LA) and right atrium (RA) global longitudinal strain (GLS) in simultaneous phases were measured using Philips Ultrasound Workspace 2D Strain in apical 4-chamber view during atrial pacing to assess intra- and inter-atrial conduction delay. The atrial GLS were measured semi-automatically, and the strain rate was analyzed in the three segments of septal wall, lateral wall, and roof and their average. The negative peak of strain rate during atrial systole was the starting point of atrial contraction, and time to peak (TTP) was measured. The difference in TTP between septal and lateral walls in each atrium was measured as intra-atrial conduction delay and the difference in average TTP between LA and RA as inter-atrial conduction delay. Results Ten patients who underwent successful BBp were enrolled (Sick sinus syndrome: 3, advanced atrioventricular block: 2, complete atrioventricular block: 5). At implantation, bipolar atrial electrogram amplitude was 2.03±0.93 mV, atrial lead impedance was 632.7±157.6 Ω, and atrial pacing threshold was 0.7±0.2 V at 0.4 ms. The PWD during sinus rhythm on the 12-lead ECG was 132.8±10.6 ms, while during BBp it was 108.0±11.9 ms, which was significantly shorter in the BBp group (p<0.001). The intra-atrial conduction delay in RA and LA was 10.9 ± 12.1 ms and 12.1 ± 17.3 ms, respectively, and the inter-atrial conduction delay was 6.6 ± 8.6 ms. On the other hand, for the 10 RAAp and 10 sinus rhythm patients as control groups, the inter-atrial conduction delay was 29.7±13.8 ms and 8.5±9.5 ms, respectively. BBp had significantly less inter-atrial conduction delay than RAAp (p=0.005) and was comparable to sinus rhythm (p=0.719). Conclusion Longitudinal bi-atrial strain suggested that BBp significantly reduced inter-atrial delay and it might be effective in AF suppression.Longitudinal bi-atrial strain

Electrogram-guided Bachmann bundle area pacing to correct interatrial block: Initial experience, safety, and feasibility

Electrophysiological Insights into Three Modalities of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients Indicated for Pacing Therapy

A Multi-Lead ECG Monitoring Combined with a Programmed Intracavitary ECG to Complete LBBaP Pacing: Study Protocol for a Single-center, Prospective Study

Preliminary Experience of Permanent Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Using Stylet‐directed Pacing Lead Without Delivery Sheath

Electrical Synchrony Optimization for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with Bradycardia and Heart Failure.

Feasibility and Outcomes of Upgrading to Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients with Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy and Infranodal Atrioventricular Block.

Anatomical and Histological Assessment of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Human Heart with Refractory Heart Failure

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing

Effects of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Permanent Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing: A Retrospective Study

Feasibility and Safety of Both His Bundle Pacing and Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: Intermediate Term Follow-Up

Durability of left bundle branch area pacing

Electroanatomical mapping-guided left bundle branch area pacing in patients with structural heart disease and advanced conduction abnormalities

Verification of intra- and inter-atrial conduction during Bachmann's bundle pacing using longitudinal bi-atrial strain

A mcgyvering way to left bundle branch area pacing : using the treadmill test machine ECG system and modified V1 / V6 leads connected to the pacing system analyser for left bundle branch area pacing

Feasibility, safety, and short-term follow-up of defibrillator lead at left bundle branch area pacing location: A pilot study

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure and Left Bundle Branch Block

Left bundle branch area pacing using a lumenless lead: A systematic literature review and meta‐analysis

Left bundle branch pacing lead for sensing ventricular arrhythmias in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: A pilot study (LBBP-ICD study)

B-PO01-022 EXPLORING THE OPTIMAL PACING MODALITY IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH-GRADE ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK AND RIGHT BUNDLE BRANCH BLOCK PATTERN: A PILOT STUDY

Feasibility of Conduction System Pacing in Patients with Baseline Bundle Branch Block—A Single-Center Mid-Term Follow-Up Study

Result of the left bundle branch area pacing data collection registry, an international multicenter study of conduction system pacing with a Tendril STS 2088 stylet‐driven lead