Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background</h3>Right ventricular apex (RVA) is still the most common implanted site in the world. There are a large number of RVA pacing population who have been carrying dual-chamber permanent pacemaker (PPM) over decades. Comparison of left ventricular dyssynchrony, morphology and systolic function between RVA pacing population and healthy population is unknown.<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Method</h3>This case-control study enrolled 61 patients suffered from complete atrioventricular block (III°AVB) for replacement of dual-chamber PPM. Then, 61 healthy controls matched with PPM patients in gender, age, follow-up duration and complications were included. The lead impedance, pacing threshold and sensing were compared between at implantation and long-term follow-up. Left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony, morphology and systolic function were compared between RVA pacing population (RVA group) and healthy population (healthy group) at implantation (baseline) and follow-up. And clarify the predictors of LV systolic function in RVA group at follow-up.<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3>After 112.44 ± 34.94 months of follow-up, comparing with parameters at implantation, atrial lead impedance decreased significantly (690 ± 2397 Ω vs 613 ± 2257 Ω, p = 0.048); atrial pacing threshold has a increased trend and P-wave amplitude has a decreased trend, but there was no statistical differences; while, RVA ventricular lead threshold increased significantly (0.50 ± 0.23 V vs 0.91 ± 0.47 V, p < 0.001), impedance (902 ± 397 Ω vs 680 ± 257 Ω,p < 0.001) and R-wave amplitude (11.71 ± 9.40mv vs 7.00 ± 6.91 mv, p < 0.001) decreased significantly. Compared with healthy group, long-term RVA pacing significantly increased ventricular dyssynchrony (mean QRS duration, 156.21 ± 29.80 ms vs 97.08 ± 15.70 ms, p < 0.001), left atrium diameter (LAD, 40.61 ± 6.15 mm vs 37.49 ± 4.80 mm,p = 0.002), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD, 49.15 ± 5.93 mm vs 46.41 ± 3.80 mm,p = 0.003), left ventricular hypertrophy (LVMI, 121.86 ± 41.52 g/m2 vs 98.41 ± 25.29 g/m2,p < 0.001), significantly deteriorated degree of tricuspid regurgitation (p < 0.001), and significantly decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, 61.38 ± 8.10% vs 64.64 ± 5.85%, p = 0.012), but after long-term RVA pacing, the mean LVEF was still more than 50%. Long-term RVA group LVEF was negatively correlated with preimplantation LVMI (B = -0.055,t = −2.244,p = 0.029), LVMI at follow-up (B = −0.081,t = −3.864,p = 0.000) and tricuspid regurgitation at follow-up (B = −3.797,t = −3.599,p = 0.001).<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3>In conclusion, although long-term RVA pacing has significantly effects on left ventricular dyssynchrony, morphology and systolic function in III°AVB patients, the mean LVEF is still >50%. High preimplantation LVMI can predict the decline of LVEF.

Self‐association and solubility of peptides: Solvent‐titration study of Nα‐protected C‐terminal sequences of substance P

New-onset Heart Failure after Permanent Right Ventricular Apical Pacing in Patients with Acquired High-Grade Atrioventricular Block and Normal Left Ventricular Function.

The novel 2009 H1N1 influenza virus pandemic: unique considerations for programs in cardiothoracic transplantation.

Long-term outcomes of TAVI patients undergoing different pacing modality: LBBAP versus RVP

[Relapsing polychondritis, interstitial granulomatous dermatitis and antiphospholipid syndrome: an unusual clinical association].

Is Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Pacing Superior To Right Ventricular Apex Pacing? A Long-Term Follow-Up Study

Comparison of Right Ventricular Apex and Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Septum Pacing in the Elderly with Normal Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: Long-Term Follow-Up

Adverse Consequences Of Right Ventricular Apical Pacing And Novel Strategies To Optimize Left Ventricular Systolic And Diastolic Function

The effects of right ventricular outflow tract and right ventricular apex pacing on left ventricular systolic function and cardiac remodeling

Reduction of Unnecessary Right Ventricular Pacing by Managed Ventricular Pacing and Search AV+ Algorithms in Pacemaker Patients: 12-Month Follow-Up Results of a Randomized Study.

Left atrial remodeling and reduced atrial pump function after chronic right ventricular apical pacing in patients with preserved ejection fraction

Long-term follow-up results of the pacing to avoid cardiac enlargement (PACE) trial.

The effect of afterload on right ventricular pacing-induced left ventricular dysfunction: a translational study

Effects of long-term right ventricular apex pacing on left ventricular dyssynchrony, morphology and systolic function

Recovery rate from conduction disorders in patients with permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Is right ventricular outflow tract pacing superior to right ventricular apex pacing in patients with normal cardiac function?

Echocardiographic parameters associated with less reverse left ventricular remodeling after transcatheter aortic valve implant in subjects with prosthesis patient mismatch

Mid-term clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing compared to accurate right ventricular septal pacing

Effects of Right Ventricular Outflow Tract and Right Ventricular Apex Pacing on Ventricular Contraction Synchrony and Cardiac Function

Comparison of acute changes in left ventricular volume, systolic and diastolic functions, and intraventricular synchronicity after biventricular and right ventricular pacing for heart failure.

New approaches to breast reconstruction.