Abstract:Introduction: Electrophysiological testing has been proposed in the latest European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for cardiac pacing to identify left bundle branch block (LBBB) patients with infrahisian conduction delay (IHCD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). While in general IHCD is defined by a His-ventricular (HV) interval of >55 ms, a cut-off of ≥70 ms to trigger pacemaker (PM) implantation has been proposed in the latest ESC guidelines. The ventricular pacing (VP) burden during follow-up in such patients is largely unknown. As such, we aimed to assess the VP burden during follow-up of patients receiving PM therapy for LBBB after TAVR based on an HV interval > 55 ms and ≥70 ms. Methods: All patients with new-onset or pre-existing LBBB after undergoing TAVR at a tertiary referral center underwent EP testing the day after TAVR. In patients with a prolonged HV interval (>55 ms), PM implantation was performed by a trained electrophysiologist in a standardized fashion. All devices were programmed to avoid unnecessary VP by specific algorithms (e.g., AAI-DDD). Results: 701 patients underwent TAVR at the University Hospital of Basel. One hundred seventy-seven patients presented with new-onset or pre-existing LBBB the day following TAVR and underwent EP testing. An HV interval > 55 ms was found in 58 patients (33%) and an HV interval ≥ 70 ms in 21 patients (12%). 51 patients (mean age 84 ± 6.2 years, 45% women) agreed to receive a PM, out of which 20 (39%) patients had an HV Interval over 70 ms. Atrial fibrillation was present in 53% of the patients. A dual chamber PM was implanted in 39 (77%), and a single chamber PC in 12 (23%) patients, respectively. Median follow-up was 21 months. The median VP burden overall was 3%. The median VP burden was not significantly different between patients with an HV ≥ 70 ms (6.5 [0.8-52]) and those with an HV between 55 and 69 ms (2 [0-17], p = .23). 31% of patients demonstrated a VP burden < 1%, 27% 1%-5% and 41% > 5%. The median HV intervals in patients with VP burdens < 1%, 1%-5% and >5% were 66 (IQR 62-70) ms, 66 (IQR 63-74) ms and 68 (IQR 60-72) ms, respectively, p = .52. When only assessing patients with an HV interval 55-69 ms, 36% demonstrated a VP burden of <1%, 29% of 1%-5% and 35% of >5%. In patients with an HV Interval ≥ 70 ms, 25% demonstrated a VP burden < 1%, 25% of 1%-5% and 50% of >5% %, p = .64 (Figure). Conclusion: In patients with LBBB after TAVR and IHCD defined by an HV interval > 55 ms, VP burden is relevant in a non-negligible amount of patients during follow-up. Further studies are warranted to define the optimal cut-off value for the HV interval or to develop risk models incorporating HV measurements and other risk factors to trigger PM implantation in patients with LBBB after TAVR.

Impact of left bundle branch block or permanent pacemaker after transcatheter aortic valve replacement on mid-term left ventricular ejection fraction

Current Opinions on New-Onset Left Bundle Branch Block after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and the Search for Physiological Pacing

Electrophysiological evaluation following development of new and persistent left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A single center pilot study

Rapid Reversal of Heart Failure by Correcting Left Bundle Branch Block Induced by Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Long-term outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing compared with right ventricular pacing in TAVI patients

Chronic Right Ventricular Pacing Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Attenuates the Benefit on Left Ventricular Function

Long-term outcomes of TAVI patients undergoing different pacing modality: LBBAP versus RVP

Incidence and Outcomes of New-Onset Right Bundle Branch Block Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Conduction dynamics over time after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: An expert review

Incidence and Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients Who Underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Observation of a Chinese Population.

Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Morphology as a Predictor of Conductance Disturbances Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Incidence of arrhythmias and impact of permanent pacemaker implantation in hospitalizations with transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Ventricular pacing burden in patients with left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement therapy

Predictors, clinical impact, and management strategies for conduction abnormalities after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: an updated review

842The effect of post TAVR pacemaker implantation on mid and long-term mortality

Prognostic Impact of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Improvement after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Post‐TAVR conduction abnormalities leading to permanent pacemaker implantation: Risk factors, prevention, and management

Recovery rate from conduction disorders in patients with permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Left ventricular ejection fraction and clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Anatomical Predictors of Pacemaker Dependency After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Impact of right and left ventricular systolic dysfunction on perioperative outcome and long-term survival after transcatheter aortic valve replacement