Abstract:We systematically investigate issues due to mis-specification that arise in estimating causal effects when (treatment) interference is informed by a network available pre-intervention, i.e., in situations where the outcome of a unit may depend on the treatment assigned to other units. We develop theory for several forms of interference through the concept of exposure neighborhood, and develop the corresponding semi-parametric representation for potential outcomes as a function of the exposure neighborhood. Using this representation, we extend the definition of two popular classes of causal estimands, marginal and average causal effects, to the case of network interference. We characterize the bias and variance one incurs when combining classical randomization strategies (namely, Bernoulli, Completely Randomized, and Cluster Randomized designs) and estimators (namely, difference-in-means and Horvitz-Thompson) used to estimate average treatment effect and on the total treatment effect, under misspecification due to interference. We illustrate how difference-in-means estimators can have arbitrarily large bias when estimating average causal effects, depending on the form and strength of interference, which is unknown at design stage. Horvitz-Thompson (HT) estimators are unbiased when the correct weights are specified. Here, we derive the HT weights for unbiased estimation of different estimands, and illustrate how they depend on the design, the form of interference, which is unknown at design stage, and the estimand. More importantly, we show that HT estimators are in-admissible for a large class of randomization strategies, in the presence of interference. We develop new model-assisted and model-dependent strategies to improve HT estimators, and we develop new randomization strategies for estimating the average treatment effect and total treatment effect.

Nonrandom Exposure to Exogenous Shocks

Estimating Total Treatment Effect in Randomized Experiments with Unknown Network Structure

An Instrumental Variable Approach to Learning the Causal Exposure-Response Relationship in a Randomized Dose Comparison Trial

Stochastic interventions, sensitivity analysis, and optimal transport

Relaxing Instrument Exogeneity with Common Confounders

An Optimal Transport Approach to Estimating Causal Effects via Nonlinear Difference-in-Differences

Analysis of Randomized Experiments with Network Interference and Noncompliance

Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects in nonstationary time series with state-space models

A systematic investigation of classical causal inference strategies under mis-specification due to network interference

Extreme-based causal effect learning with endogenous exposures and a light-tailed error

Estimating Time-Varying Direct and Indirect Causal Excursion Effects with Longitudinal Binary Outcomes

Regression adjustments for estimating the global treatment effect in experiments with interference

Inferring the Long-Term Causal Effects of Long-Term Treatments from Short-Term Experiments

Treatment Effect Estimation with Noisy Conditioning Variables

Estimation of the Number Needed to Treat, the Number Needed to be Exposed, and the Exposure Impact Number with Instrumental Variables

Estimating treatment effect heterogeneity in randomized program evaluation

Causal Inference When Counterfactuals Depend on the Proportion of All Subjects Exposed

Randomization inference for treatment effect variation

Estimating Treatment Effects using Multiple Surrogates: The Role of the Surrogate Score and the Surrogate Index

Using Standard Tools from Finite Population Sampling to Improve Causal Inference for Complex Experiments

Randomization Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects under Network Interference