Abstract:Large observational databases are often subject to missing data. As such, methods for causal inference must simultaneously handle confounding and missingness; surprisingly little work has been done at this intersection. Motivated by this, we propose an efficient and robust estimator of the causal average treatment effect from cohort studies when confounders are missing at random. The approach is based on a novel factorization of the likelihood that, unlike alternative methods, facilitates flexible modelling of nuisance functions (e.g., with state‐of‐the‐art machine learning methods) while maintaining nominal convergence rates of the final estimators. Simulated data, derived from an electronic health record‐based study of the long‐term effects of bariatric surgery on weight outcomes, verify the robustness properties of the proposed estimators in finite samples. Our approach may serve as a theoretical benchmark against which ad hoc methods may be assessed. Résumé Les grandes bases de données observationnelles sont souvent confrontées au problème des données manquantes. De ce fait, les méthodes d'inférence causale doivent gérer à la fois les facteurs de confusion et les données manquantes, un domaine étonnamment peu exploré. Pour répondre à ce défi, les auteurs de cet article proposent un estimateur efficace et robuste de l'effet causal moyen du traitement. Cet estimateur est spécialement conçu pour les études de cohortes où les facteurs de confusion sont manquants de manière aléatoire. L'approche proposée s'appuie sur une nouvelle factorisation de la vraisemblance. Contrairement à d'autres méthodes, celle‐ci permet de modéliser les fonctions de nuisance de manière flexible, notamment grâce à des techniques avancées d'apprentissage automatique, et ce tout en maintenant les taux de convergence attendus des estimateurs finaux. Des simulations basées sur des dossiers médicaux électroniques concernant les effets à long terme de la chirurgie bariatrique sur le poids confirment la robustesse des estimateurs dans des échantillons finis. Cette approche pourrait servir de référence théorique pour évaluer d'autres méthodes ad‐hoc.

Extreme-based causal effect learning with endogenous exposures and a light-tailed error

Causality and extremes

Counterfactual Covariate Causal Discovery on Nonlinear Extremal Quantiles

Estimation and Inference of Extremal Quantile Treatment Effects for Heavy-Tailed Distributions

Two-Way Exclusion Restrictions in Models with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects

A new approach to hierarchical data analysis: Targeted maximum likelihood estimation for the causal effect of a cluster-level exposure

Functional Extreme-PLS

Robust causal inference for point exposures with missing confounders

Nonrandom Exposure to Exogenous Shocks

Individual causal effects from observational longitudinal studies with time-varying exposures

Causal inference with a quantitative exposure

Prediction of Extremal Expectile Based on Regression Models With Heteroscedastic Extremes

Extreme Conditional Quantiles for Panel Data Model with Individual Effects

An Instrumental Variable Approach to Learning the Causal Exposure-Response Relationship in a Randomized Dose Comparison Trial

Toward Unique and Unbiased Causal Effect Estimation From Data With Hidden Variables

Inverting estimating equations for causal inference on quantiles

Extreme Quantile Treatment Effects under Endogeneity: Evaluating Policy Effects for the Most Vulnerable Individuals

Local search for efficient causal effect estimation

Causal discovery in heavy-tailed models

Explanatory causal effects for model agnostic explanations

Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Community-based Causal Effect of Community-Level Stochastic Interventions