Abstract:Large observational databases are often subject to missing data. As such, methods for causal inference must simultaneously handle confounding and missingness; surprisingly little work has been done at this intersection. Motivated by this, we propose an efficient and robust estimator of the causal average treatment effect from cohort studies when confounders are missing at random. The approach is based on a novel factorization of the likelihood that, unlike alternative methods, facilitates flexible modelling of nuisance functions (e.g., with state‐of‐the‐art machine learning methods) while maintaining nominal convergence rates of the final estimators. Simulated data, derived from an electronic health record‐based study of the long‐term effects of bariatric surgery on weight outcomes, verify the robustness properties of the proposed estimators in finite samples. Our approach may serve as a theoretical benchmark against which ad hoc methods may be assessed. Résumé Les grandes bases de données observationnelles sont souvent confrontées au problème des données manquantes. De ce fait, les méthodes d'inférence causale doivent gérer à la fois les facteurs de confusion et les données manquantes, un domaine étonnamment peu exploré. Pour répondre à ce défi, les auteurs de cet article proposent un estimateur efficace et robuste de l'effet causal moyen du traitement. Cet estimateur est spécialement conçu pour les études de cohortes où les facteurs de confusion sont manquants de manière aléatoire. L'approche proposée s'appuie sur une nouvelle factorisation de la vraisemblance. Contrairement à d'autres méthodes, celle‐ci permet de modéliser les fonctions de nuisance de manière flexible, notamment grâce à des techniques avancées d'apprentissage automatique, et ce tout en maintenant les taux de convergence attendus des estimateurs finaux. Des simulations basées sur des dossiers médicaux électroniques concernant les effets à long terme de la chirurgie bariatrique sur le poids confirment la robustesse des estimateurs dans des échantillons finis. Cette approche pourrait servir de référence théorique pour évaluer d'autres méthodes ad‐hoc.

Causal inference with a quantitative exposure

Causal inference with missing exposure information: Methods and applications to an obstetric study.

A Review of Causal Inference Methods for Estimating the Effects of Exposure Change when Incident Exposure Is Unobservable

Formulating causal questions and principled statistical answers

Causal Inference for Quantile Treatment Effects

An Instrumental Variable Approach to Learning the Causal Exposure-Response Relationship in a Randomized Dose Comparison Trial

Causal inference under over-simplified longitudinal causal models

The covariate-adjusted residual estimator and its use in both randomized trials and observational settings

Quantifying causal effects from observed data using quasi-intervention

Causal Inference When Counterfactuals Depend on the Proportion of All Subjects Exposed

Nonparametric Inference on Dose-Response Curves Without the Positivity Condition

An Approach to Nonparametric Inference on the Causal Dose Response Function

Robust causal inference for point exposures with missing confounders

Causal Inference with High-dimensional Discrete Covariates

Sharp Bounds on Causal Effects in Case-Control and Cohort Studies

Causal inference targeting a concentration index for studies of health inequalities

Convex Mixture Regression for Quantitative Risk Assessment

Inverting estimating equations for causal inference on quantiles

Discussion of 'Causal inference with misspecified exposure mappings: separating definitions and assumptions'

Nonlinear mixed‐effects modeling as a method for causal inference to predict exposures under desired within‐subject dose titration schemes

Estimating the marginal effect of a continuous exposure on an ordinal outcome using data subject to covariate‐driven treatment and visit processes