Abstract:Empirical economic studies are often confronted by the joint problem of weak instruments and near exogeneity, such as labor economics and empirical economic growth theory. This dissertation presents new evidence and solutions on estimation and inference with weak instruments and near exogeneity. Chapter 1 reexamines the effect of institutions on economic performance in Acemoglu, Johnson and Robinson (2001) where the measurement of current institutions is instrumented by European settler mortality rates. Since many economists argue that the settler mortality rates can possibly affect economic performance through other channels, I reexamine the effect of institutions by considering near exogeneity. I provide some evidence to show that the effect of institutions is not significant in many regression specifications when the settler mortality rates are used as the main instrument.Chapter 2 studies estimation and inference with weak instruments and near exogeneity in a linear simultaneous equations model. I show that near exogeneity can exaggerate asymptotic bias of the TSLS and the LIML estimators. When using critical values from chi-square distributions, Anderson-Rubin and Kleibergen tests under exogeneity have a large size distortion. I propose the delete-d jackknife based Anderson-Rubin and Kleibergen tests to automatically reduce the size distortion in finite samples without a need for any pretest of exogeneity.Chapter 3 extends estimation and inference with weak identification and near exogeneity into a GMM framework with instrumental variables. A GMM framework allows nonlinear and nondifferentiable moment conditions. I examine asymptotic results of one-step GMM estimator, two-step efficient GMM estimator and continuously updating estimator with weak identification and near exogeneity. Near exogeneity can produce relatively large bias for all these estimators. The Anderson-Rubin type and the Kleibergen type tests under near exogeneity converge in distribution to nonstandard distributions, which creates large size distortion when using critical values from chi-square distributions. The delete-d jackknife based approach can reduce the size distortion

Relaxing Instrument Exogeneity with Common Confounders

Testing Independence Between Exogenous Variables and Unobserved Errors

Weak identification with many instruments

Are “Nearly Exogenous Instruments” reliable?

Linear Regression with Weak Exogeneity

Identifiability of Sparse Causal Effects using Instrumental Variables

Nonparametric Identification and Estimation with Independent, Discrete Instruments

BudgetIV: Optimal Partial Identification of Causal Effects with Mostly Invalid Instruments

Relaxing the exclusion restriction in shift-share instrumental variable estimation

A semiparametric instrumental variable approach to optimal treatment regimes under endogeneity

Identification with possibly invalid IVs

Using negative controls to identify causal effects with invalid instrumental variables

Identifying Causal Effects of Discrete, Ordered and ContinuousTreatments using Multiple Instrumental Variables

Testing overidentifying restrictions on high-dimensional instruments and covariates

Bayesian variable selection in linear regression models with instrumental variables

Selective Machine Learning of the Average Treatment Effect with an Invalid Instrumental Variable

Estimation and Inference with Weak Instruments and Near Exogeneity

Cleaning Up Confounding: Accounting for Endogeneity Using Instrumental Variables and Two-Stage Models

Nonrandom Exposure to Exogenous Shocks

Treatment Effect Estimation with Noisy Conditioning Variables

Sequential Underspecified Instrument Selection for Cause-Effect Estimation