The consequences of emotionally evocative patient behaviors on emergency nurses' patient assessments and handoffs: An experimental study using simulated patient cases
Nathan R Huff,Hannah Chimowitz,Maria A DelPico,Kelly T Gleason,Janvi D Nanavati,Peter Smulowitz,Linda M Isbell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104507
Abstract:Background: Engaging with human emotions is an integral but poorly understood part of the work of emergency healthcare providers. Patient factors (e.g., irritable behavior; mental illness) can evoke strong emotions, and evidence suggests that these emotions can impact care quality and patient safety. Given that nurses play a critical role in providing high quality care, efforts to identify and remedy factors that may compromise care are needed. Yet to date, few experiments have been conducted. Objective: To examine the effects of emotionally evocative patient behavior as well as the presence of mental illness on emergency nurses' emotions, patient assessments, testing advocacy, and written handoffs. Design: Experimental vignette research. Setting: Online experiment distributed via email between October and December 2020. Participants: Convenience sample of 130 emergency nurses from seven hospitals in the Northeastern United States and one hospital in the mid-Atlantic region in the United States. Methods: Nurses completed four multimedia computer-simulated patient encounters in which patient behavior (irritable vs. calm) and mental illness (present vs. absent) were experimentally varied. Nurses reported their emotions and clinical assessments, recommended diagnostic tests, and provided written handoffs. Tests were coded for whether the test would result in a correct diagnosis, and handoffs were coded for negative and positive patient descriptions and the presence of specific clinical information. Results: Nurses experienced more negative emotions (anger, unease) and reported less engagement when assessing patients exhibiting irritable (vs. calm) behavior. Nurses also judged patients with irritable (vs. calm) behavior as more likely to exaggerate their pain and as poorer historians, and as less likely to cooperate, return to work, and recover. Nurses' handoffs were more likely to communicate negative descriptions of patients with irritable (vs. calm) behavior and omit specific clinical information (e.g., whether tests were ordered, personal information). The presence of mental illness increased unease and sadness and resulted in nurses being less likely to recommend a necessary test for a correct diagnosis. Conclusions: Emergency nurses' assessments and handoffs were impacted by patient factors, particularly irritable patient behavior. As nurses are central to the clinical team and experience regular, close contact with patients, the effects of irritable patient behavior on nursing assessments and care practices have important implications. We discuss potential approaches to address these ill effects, including reflexive practice, teamwork, and standardization of handoffs. Tweetable abstract: Simulated experimental study found that despite having received identical clinical information, emergency nurses believed that patients displaying irritable behaviours were less likely to return to work soon and were less likely to recover than patients who displayed calm behaviour.