I Just Don't Want It To Be Business, Business, Business: Facilitators And Barriers To Values Discussions Between Patients With A Left Ventricular Assist Device, Their Family Caregivers, And The Healthcare Team
Avery C. Bechthold,Deborah B. Ejem,Colleen K. McIlvennan,Rachel D. Wells,Daniel D. Matlock,Christopher E. Knoepke,Marie A. Bakitas,James Nicholas Dionne-Odom
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.10.013
IF: 6.592
2024-01-01
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Abstract:Background Intentional exploration, or elicitation, of patient values (who and what matters most) in the context of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) can assist in identifying health preferences and care priorities. Yet, the values elicitation experiences of individuals post LVAD-implantation have been understudied, particularly among historically minoritized African American (AA)/Black and rural-dwelling individuals. Understanding the facilitators and barriers to values discussions among individuals from these groups is critical to addressing disparities in outcomes and optimizing patient-centered decision-making. Objectives To identify facilitators and barriers to values discussions between patients with an LVAD, their family caregivers (FCGs), and the healthcare team. Methods Analysis of qualitative data from an ongoing convergent mixed methods study (January 2023-present) among AA/Black and rural-dwelling patients with an LVAD recruited from a large outpatient center in the U.S. South. Participants completed a semi-structured, in-person/telephone interview where questions were asked about their values elicitation experiences. Transcribed interviews were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. Results Fourteen participants ages 30-69 were interviewed. Patients were predominantly non-Hispanic AA/Black (n=12, 86%), male (n=9, 64%), and urban-dwelling (n=10, 71%). Patients reported previous values discussions with their FCGs (n=14, 100%) and healthcare team (n=10, 71%). Facilitators to discussions with FCGs and the healthcare team included a perceived close relationship, sharing similar values (e.g., belief in a higher power), and patient motivation to discuss their values (e.g., assertive personality). Barriers to discussions with FCGs included grief over loss of previously enjoyable activities (e.g., inability to engage in hobbies), FCG distress, and lack of time (e.g., acute illness); barriers to discussions with the healthcare team included previous conflict, receiving mixed messages about the treatment plan, perceived lack of time (e.g., brief appointments), and seeing different providers each visit. Conclusions Qualitative analyses of an ongoing mixed methods study found that facilitators of values discussions included a perceived close relationship, sharing similar values, and patient motivation to discuss their values. Barriers included grief over loss of previously enjoyable activities, FCG distress, lack of time, previous conflict, receiving mixed messages about the treatment plan, and seeing different providers each visit. Generating a comprehensive understanding of the values elicitation experiences of patients and their FCGs is critical to the development of interventions aimed at increasing values discussions between patients, FCGs, and the healthcare team. Future work is needed to understand facilitators and barriers to values discussions from the clinician perspective.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems