Abstract:PurposeThe effect of board intellectual capital on non-profit organizational performance in non-western, less developed economies has been an important yet under-researched area. Given that the institutional and business relationships of a board account for the majority of board intellectual capital, the purpose of this paper is to fill the previously mentioned research gap by addressing how the interactions of the two relationships of board directors influence Chinese philanthropic foundation performance.Design/methodology/approachFollowing Creswell's (2014) explanatory sequential mixed-methodology, a qualitative study (Study 1) was first conducted to pre-test the assumptions, and then a quantitative study (Study 2) was carried out based on a secondary database of 1,405 Chinese philanthropic foundations to further examine the hypotheses. Several regression models were built for analyzing the results.FindingsStudy 1 confirmed that Chinese philanthropic foundations gained greater revenues and hosted more public welfare activities by leveraging the reinforcing or complementary effects of board directors' intellectual capital to improve organizational performance. Study 2 further examined the hypotheses that the interactions of intellectual capital increased the total revenue and public welfare expenditure of the foundations; however, significant positive relationships were only identified in foundations at the local level, and no significant associations were found in those at the national level.Practical implicationsThe research indicates that the intellectual capital of board directors may influence the performance of their philanthropic foundations. Thus, Chinese philanthropic foundations should be more aware of the importance of this influence when determining which candidates will join the board.Originality/valueThe study makes significant contributions to the existing knowledge of the development of non-governmental organizations; it incorporates the resource dependence theory and agency theory into understanding how the intricate interactions between the institutional and business relationships of board directors affect foundation performance and how the jurisdiction affiliations act as a boundary condition for such relationships in a non-western setting such as China.

Business Professors in the Boardroom: Can they walk-the-talk?

The Influence of Board Directors' Institutional and Business Relationships on Philanthropic Foundation Performance

Beyond the ivory tower: Professors on the board and corporate performance in China

Debt of Bank, Institutional Environment and the Agent Cost of Controlling Shareholder

From Classroom to Boardroom: the Value of Academic Independent Directors

Professors on boards and corporate innovation in China

Affiliated Bankers on Board and Firm Environmental Management: U. S. Evidence

Board independence and PIPE offerings

Does board diversity in industry-experience boost firm value? The role of corporate innovation

Political and Interlocking Connections in the Boardroom on Private Equity Placements

The Independence of Independent Directors:Evidence from Board Voting Behavior

Does Independence of the Board Affect Firm Performance?

Affiliated bankers on board and firm environmental management: U.S. evidence

Board Independence, Ownership Concentration and Corporate Performance - Chinese Evidence

Do politically connected independent directors create or destroy value

The Effect of Accounting Academics in the Boardroom on the Value Relevance of Financial Reporting Information

Do Outside Directors Matter? the Impact of Prestigious CEOs on Firm Performance

Impact of Independent Director's Background on the Firm's Value:Based on the Medium and Small-sized Enterprises Board in China

Do independent directors' scientific achievements matter? Evidence from over-investment of Chinese listed firms

Independent Directors’ Characteristics and Performance: Evidence from China

Does Board Gender Diversity Affect the Transparency of Corporate Political Disclosure?