Abstract:In the midst of the Covid-19 pandemic, an unresolved question is the aetiology of Covid-19: Where did this novel coronavirus come from? When an account by “UK scientists” ruled out Covid-19 as a bioweapon and as a laboratory creation, the dismissal of the claims by the ‘vox pop’ was swift and deci-sive, considered and multifactorial. There was a consensus of public sentiment (of 100%) to reject the two scientific propositions of “no bioweapon” and “no laboratory involvement”. The present paper reports on the top 100 comments (ranked by reader votes and accounting for 13,983 votes, comprising 13,156 up-arrow votes and 827 down-arrow votes) of UK newspaper readers to the dismissal of Covid-19 as a bioweapon and as a laboratory construct. Commentators pointed out the coincidences surrounding the outbreak, especially that the reported ground-zero city of the outbreak, Wuhan, China, was also host to several coronavirus research laboratories. Commentators expressed their skepticism of governments, institutions, and also scientists to tell them the truth (even if those entities knew it). Commentators dismissed the lan-guage of the scientists, pointing out (quite rightly) that “improbable” does not equal “impossible”. Commentators proposed variously that Covid-19 escaped from a laboratory, was “Made in China”, and was a bioweapon. Some readers called for banning the eating of wild animals in China and thereby excluding that channel as a potential viral source in the future. The proximal origin of Covid-19 is presently an unsettled question. Scientists’ dismissal of the hypo-thesis that Covid-19 is a bioweapon or a laboratory construct is itself dismissed by the public. The public want answers but they are also quite ready to question and reject the accounts of scientists. In the meantime, the aetiology of Covid-19 can be expected to remain contested and unsettled for some considerable time.

US halts funding to controversial virus-hunting group: what researchers think

U.S. blocks funding for pandemic research group

Controversial virus-hunting scientist skewered at US COVID-origins hearing

UK Scientists Criticize White House Ban on Studies That Increase Virus Potency or Transmissibility

US funders to tighten oversight of controversial 'gain-of-function' research

Wisconsin bill would restrict pathogen studies

US trust in scientists plunged during the pandemic — but it's starting to recover

US TikTok ban: how the looming restriction is affecting scientists on the app

We need a global framework for promoting safe handling of high consequence pathogens

US COVID-origins hearing puts scientific journals in the hot seat

Exploring COVID-19 research credibility among Spanish scientists

Research advocates see 'no good news for science'

Unease as US drug agency weighs its use of independent scientists

'Stop the xenophobia' — South African researchers sound alarm on eve of election

'America first' could affect health worldwide

NIH ends funding for key parasitology database

DOI：http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/ijcemr.2020.07.011 Science Versus Public Sentiment: “Covid-19 is not a Bioweapon Created in a Laboratory, Say UK Scientists”, “Nope, Don’t Believe It”, Say UK Public.

Cuts to high-profile NIH efforts leave researchers reeling

Coronavirus symptoms, research chief quits and Nature’s plan to join Plan S

"Follow the Science" in COVID-19 Policy: A Scoping Review

U.S. agency funding for climate and health research falls short