US trust in scientists plunged during the pandemic — but it's starting to recover

Alix Soliman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-03723-5

IF: 64.8

2024-11-18

Nature

Abstract:Confidence that researchers will make decisions in the public interest rose slightly from 2023 to 2024. Confidence that scientists will make decisions in the public interest nosedived at the onset of the pandemic but has now started to rise.

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Largest post-pandemic survey finds trust in scientists is high

Carissa Wong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00420-1

IF: 64.8

2024-02-15

Nature

Abstract:Study of more than 70,000 people suggests that trust levels vary among countries and are linked to political orientation. Study of more than 70,000 people suggests that trust levels vary among countries and are linked to political orientation.

multidisciplinary sciences
Government Trust in a Time of Crisis: Survey Evidence at the Beginning of the Pandemic in China

Zhenhua Su,Shan Su,Qian Zhou

2021-01-01

Abstract:China adopted rigorous lockdowns and restrictions to contain the spread of COVID-19 from 23 January to 8 April 2020. Although the quarantine severely limited people's freedom and caused multiple secondary disasters, most Chinese citizens tolerated it. Based on an online survey conducted at the beginning of the lockdown (from 31 January to 4 February 2020), we argue that local governments in many parts of the country gained more trust than usual, narrowing the trust gap with the central government. In the early stage of the pandemic, effective implementation of anti-COVID policies, official media propaganda, and public expectation all contributed to the public's increased confidence in local governments.
Trust in Physicians and Hospitals During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a 50-State Survey of US Adults

Roy H Perlis,Katherine Ognyanova,Ata Uslu,Kristin Lunz Trujillo,Mauricio Santillana,James N Druckman,Matthew A Baum,David Lazer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24984

2024-07-01

Abstract:Importance: Trust in physicians and hospitals has been associated with achieving public health goals, but the increasing politicization of public health policies during the COVID-19 pandemic may have adversely affected such trust. Objective: To characterize changes in US adults' trust in physicians and hospitals over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic and the association between this trust and health-related behaviors. Design, setting, and participants: This survey study uses data from 24 waves of a nonprobability internet survey conducted between April 1, 2020, and January 31, 2024, among 443 455 unique respondents aged 18 years or older residing in the US, with state-level representative quotas for race and ethnicity, age, and gender. Main outcome and measure: Self-report of trust in physicians and hospitals; self-report of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza vaccination and booster status. Survey-weighted regression models were applied to examine associations between sociodemographic features and trust and between trust and health behaviors. Results: The combined data included 582 634 responses across 24 survey waves, reflecting 443 455 unique respondents. The unweighted mean (SD) age was 43.3 (16.6) years; 288 186 respondents (65.0%) reported female gender; 21 957 (5.0%) identified as Asian American, 49 428 (11.1%) as Black, 38 423 (8.7%) as Hispanic, 3138 (0.7%) as Native American, 5598 (1.3%) as Pacific Islander, 315 278 (71.1%) as White, and 9633 (2.2%) as other race and ethnicity (those who selected "Other" from a checklist). Overall, the proportion of adults reporting a lot of trust for physicians and hospitals decreased from 71.5% (95% CI, 70.7%-72.2%) in April 2020 to 40.1% (95% CI, 39.4%-40.7%) in January 2024. In regression models, features associated with lower trust as of spring and summer 2023 included being 25 to 64 years of age, female gender, lower educational level, lower income, Black race, and living in a rural setting. These associations persisted even after controlling for partisanship. In turn, greater trust was associated with greater likelihood of vaccination for SARS-CoV-2 (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 4.94; 95 CI, 4.21-5.80) or influenza (adjusted OR, 5.09; 95 CI, 3.93-6.59) and receiving a SARS-CoV-2 booster (adjusted OR, 3.62; 95 CI, 2.99-4.38). Conclusions and relevance: This survey study of US adults suggests that trust in physicians and hospitals decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic. As lower levels of trust were associated with lesser likelihood of pursuing vaccination, restoring trust may represent a public health imperative.
Interpersonal Risk Communication Matters More Than Media Risk Communication in Its Impact on Individuals' Trust and Preventive Behaviors During COVID-19.

Zakir Shah,Lu Wei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103369

IF: 4.842

2022-01-01

International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

Abstract:A cross-sectional survey study from 1496 respondents was conducted to investigate how interpersonal risk communication and media risk communication foster individuals' interpersonal trust and trust in scientists during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Findings reveal that interpersonal risk communication is significantly related to interpersonal trust and trust in scientists, but have no direct association with preventive behaviors. Media risk communication is significantly associated with preventive behaviors and increases individuals' trust in scientists while having no effect on interpersonal trust. Preventive behaviors are significantly influenced by both interpersonal trust and trust in scientists. In addition, trust mediated the association between risk communication and preventive behaviors.
Daily briefing: Global trust in scientists is high

Katrina Krämer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00496-9

IF: 64.8

2024-02-14

Nature

Abstract:A survey of more than 71,000 people in 67 countries finds that people trust scientists and believe they should play a bigger role in policy making. Plus, a private Moon landing could finally happen.

multidisciplinary sciences
Exploring the Role of Trust in Scientists to Explain Health-Related Behaviors in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic

Ebru Zeynep Muğaloğlu,Zeynep Kaymaz,Muhammet Emin Mısır,Canan Laçin-Şimşek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00323-5

Abstract:The devastating COVID-19 pandemic has cast a light on the question of why trust in scientists is important. This mixed-method study aimed to explore the study participants' trust in scientists about getting the COVID-19 vaccine. It also aimed to reveal which key sources of information participants followed about the pandemic. Participants' health-related behaviors and justifications for their behaviors as a response to the pandemic were also explored to understand how trust in scientists and sources of information played a role in the fight against COVID-19. The responses of 1233 participants across Turkey were analyzed. The findings indicated that trust in scientists and compliance with the scientists' suggested behaviors among the participants were quite high. It was also revealed that, for both trust and non-trust groups, participants questioned the reliability of information and the sources. Participants justified their behaviors mainly by referring to policies, e.g., masks, distance, and hygiene, developed and implemented with the collaboration of government, scientists, and the World Health Organization. Moreover, trust issues regarding scientists, government authorities, or other citizens were mentioned in participants' justifications. The current study also shed light on the importance of building trust through an open and healthy dialogue among scientists, government authorities, and the public to overcome the COVID-19 pandemic. The study highlighted the need for scientifically informed citizens to deal with the problems, i.e., misinformation and disinformation, in the post-truth era such as not jeopardizing effective solutions to eliminate the pandemic, e.g., taking the vaccine.
Social and political trust diverge during a crisis

Arnstein Aassve,Tommaso Capezzone,Nicolo' Cavalli,Pierluigi Conzo,Chen Peng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50898-4

IF: 4.6

2024-01-04

Scientific Reports

Abstract:This study shows that social and political trust may diverge in the face of shared threats, and that this pattern is driven by negative information about crisis management. Leveraging a three-wave panel survey and an information-provision experiment in the USA during the COVID-19 crisis, our research reveals that negative perceptions of pandemic management lead to a decline in political trust and a parallel increase in social trust. This dynamic is pronounced among government supporters, who, confronted with COVID-19 challenges, experience a substantial erosion of political trust. Simultaneously, there is a notable rise in social trust within this group. Our analysis suggests that, as government supporters attributed more responsibility for the crisis to their political leader, political trust was supplanted by social trust. Disenchanted voters, feeling let down by institutions, sought support in society. Both the survey and the experiment underscore that societal shocks can prompt individuals to shift from relying on formal institutions to informal ones as a coping strategy. This research contributes a generalizable framework explaining how negative perceptions of crisis management can lead societies to substitute political trust with social trust, advancing our understanding of societal responses to shared threats and adaptive strategies during crises.

multidisciplinary sciences
Trust in government increased during the Covid‐19 pandemic in Australia and New Zealand

Shaun Goldfinch,Ross Taplin,Robin Gauld

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12459

2021-01-06

Australian Journal of Public Administration

Abstract:Using an online panel, we surveyed a representative sample of 500 each in Australia and New Zealand during July 2020, in the middle of the Covid‐19 pandemic. We find trust in government has increased dramatically, with around 80% of respondents agreeing government was generally trustworthy. Around three quarters agreed management of the pandemic had increased their trust in government. Over 85% of respondents have confidence that public health scientists work in the public interest. Testing four hypotheses, we find that income and education predict trust in government and confidence in public health scientists, as does voting for the political party in government. Trust in government and confidence in public health scientists strongly predict Covid‐19 phone application use, largely through convincing people the App is beneficial. Trust in government then is both an outcome and antecedent of government effectiveness. Building trust is important for governments implementing difficult policy responses during a crisis.

public administration
Earning respect and trust

H Holden Thorp,H. Holden Thorp

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ado3040

IF: 56.9

2024-02-02

Science

Abstract:Respect for, and trust in, science may be at an all-time low. In the United States, a 2023 Pew Research poll showed that only 57% of the population believed science has had a positive impact on society, and a Gallup poll showed that confidence in higher education was down to 36%. If the Gallup poll were done now, support would likely be even lower, given recent events with university presidents, from questions about their research integrity to their explanations for policies on student speech. I'm frequently asked what can be done about all of this, especially in the realm of science. Many scientists think the challenge has largely to do with science communication, which is certainly important. But first, the scientific community must begin to conduct itself in the same manner that it is asking of the public, and that means treating everyone in the scientific community with respect.

multidisciplinary sciences
Trust in science and scientists among university students, staff, and faculty of a large, diverse university in Los Angeles during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Trojan Pandemic Response Initiative

Michele Nicolo,Eric Kawaguchi,Angie Ghanem-Uzqueda,Daniel Soto,Sohini Deva,Kush Shanker,Ryan Lee,Frank Gilliland,Jeffrey D Klausner,Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati,Andrea Kovacs,Sarah Van Orman,Howard Hu,Jennifer B Unger

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15533-x

IF: 4.5

2023-03-30

BMC Public Health

Abstract:Background: Mistrust in science and scientists may adversely influence the rate of COVID-19 vaccination and undermine public health initiatives to reduce virus transmission. Methods: Students, staff and faculty responded to an email invitation to complete an electronic survey. Surveys included 21-items from the Trust in Science and Scientists Inventory questionnaire. Responses were coded so higher scores indicated a higher trust in science and scientists, A linear regression model including sex, age group, division, race and ethnicity, political affiliation, and history of COVID-19, was used to determine variables significantly associated with trust in science and scientists scores at the p < 0.05 level. Results: Participants were mostly female (62.1%), Asian (34.7%) and White (39.5%) and students (70.6%). More than half identified their political affiliation as Democrat (65%). In the final regression model, all races and ethnicities had significantly lower mean trust in science and scientists scores than White participants [Black ([Formula: see text]= -0.42, 95% CI: -0.55, -0.43, p < 0.001); Asian ([Formula: see text]= -0.20, 95% CI: -0.24, -0.17, p < 0.001); Latinx ([Formula: see text]= -0.22, 95% CI: -0.27, -0.18, p < 0.001); Other ([Formula: see text]= -0.19, 95% CI: -0.26, -0.11, p < 0.001)]. Compared to those identifying as Democrat, all other political affiliations had significantly lower mean scores. [Republican ([Formula: see text] =-0.49, 95% CI: -0.55, -0.43, p < 0.0001); Independent ([Formula: see text] =-0.29, 95% CI: -0.33, -0.25, p < 0.0001); something else ([Formula: see text] =-0.19, 95% CI: -0.25, -0.12, p < 0.0001)]. Having had COVID-19 ([Formula: see text]= -0.10, 95% CI: -0.15, -0.06, p < 0.001) had significantly lower scores compared to those who did not have COVID-19. Conclusion: Despite the setting of a major research University, trust in science is highly variable. This study identifies characteristics that could be used to target and curate educational campaigns and university policies to address the COVID19 and future pandemics.
Public understanding of science: Communicating in the midst of a pandemic

Salim S. Abdool Karim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221089391

2022-05-02

Public Understanding of Science

Abstract:Public Understanding of Science, Volume 31, Issue 3, Page 282-287, April 2022. While Covid-19 created unprecedented transparency with real-time reporting across the globe, the pandemic's politically charged environment made public communication of scientific information particularly challenging. Scientists, as authoritative voices, were thrust into the public eye to explain the evidence amid uncertainty, a changing virus, distrust in government and concerns about their self-interest and hidden agendas. Honest communication that provides the public with enough easy-to-understand information to make up their own minds is essential during the pandemic; the public deserves nothing less.

communication,history & philosophy of science
Trust in scientific information mediates associations between conservatism and coronavirus responses in the U.S., but few other nations

Quinnehtukqut McLamore,Stylianos Syropoulos,Bernhard Leidner,Gilad Hirschberger,Kevin Young,Rizqy Amelia Zein,Anna Baumert,Michal Bilewicz,Arda Bilgen,Maarten J van Bezouw,Armand Chatard,Peggy Chekroun,Juana Chinchilla,Hoon-Seok Choi,Hyun Euh,Angel Gomez,Peter Kardos,Ying Hooi Khoo,Mengyao Li,Jean-Baptiste Légal,Steve Loughnan,Silvia Mari,Roseann Tan-Mansukhani,Orla Muldoon,Masi Noor,Maria Paola Paladino,Nebojša Petrović,Hema Preya Selvanathan,Özden Melis Uluğ,Michael J Wohl,Wai Lan Victoria Yeung,B Burrows

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07508-6

2022-03-08

Abstract:U.S.-based research suggests conservatism is linked with less concern about contracting coronavirus and less preventative behaviors to avoid infection. Here, we investigate whether these tendencies are partly attributable to distrust in scientific information, and evaluate whether they generalize outside the U.S., using public data and recruited representative samples across three studies (Ntotal = 34,710). In Studies 1 and 2, we examine these relationships in the U.S., yielding converging evidence for a sequential indirect effect of conservatism on compliance through scientific (dis)trust and infection concern. In Study 3, we compare these relationships across 19 distinct countries. Although the relationships between trust in scientific information about the coronavirus, concern about coronavirus infection, and compliance are consistent cross-nationally, the relationships between conservatism and trust in scientific information are not. These relationships are strongest in North America. Consequently, the indirect effects observed in Studies 1-2 only replicate in North America (the U.S. and Canada) and in Indonesia. Study 3 also found parallel direct and indirect effects on support for lockdown restrictions. These associations suggest not only that relationships between conservatism and compliance are not universal, but localized to particular countries where conservatism is more strongly related to trust in scientific information about the coronavirus pandemic.
Government Response Measures and Public Trust during the COVID‐19 Pandemic: Evidence from Around the World

Jia Liu,Yasir Shahab,Hafiz Hoque

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12577

IF: 5.6

2021-12-23

British Journal of Management

Abstract:This study examines public trust in government and public belief in its truthfulness in respect of the measures it is taking to combat COVID‐19. Analysing global data from the International Coronavirus Survey of 178 countries between 20 March and 8 April 2020, we establish that integrated government response policies, underpinned by containment health measures and economic reliefs, are crucial to winning public trust and support. We find that a one standard deviation increase in composite government response measures leads to a 0.353% increase in public trust in government and a 0.414% increase in public belief in its truthfulness. The impacts vary according to legal systems, whose political ethos determines the quality of welfare services and their ability to respond to citizens’ needs during a public health emergency. Further, public trust in government measures differs in relation to how a country's system of governance and institutional culture respond to meet public expectations, with citizens’ attitudes influenced by the fairness, effectiveness and accountability of government agencies. Most importantly, our evidence consistently demonstrates that the provision of impartial, transparent and truthful government communications is vital for maintaining public trust. Moreover, experience gained from previous pandemics, reinforcing a nation's preparedness and responsiveness to future public health crises, is crucial to ensuring citizens’ confidence in government competence. Overall, our original investigation reveals a contention between the exigencies of government policies and public expectations in a global health emergency, and has profound implications for public management and business and economic regeneration in the aftermath of the pandemic, laying the foundations for future research.

management,business
Trust in scientific institutions and experts during the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic in Finland

Piia T. Jallinoja,Eetu V. Vento,Esa T. Väliverronen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948241289633

2024-10-25

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health

Abstract:Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Ahead of Print. Aims:To explore variations in trust in science and scientific institutions in Finland during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the factors influencing trust in experts of a key institution in the management of the pandemic, the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL). These results are contrasted with trust in the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.Methods:Five surveys were conducted between April 2020 and March 2022 (n=5448). The changes were tested with the chi-square test. Predictors of trust in THL and the ministry was examined with binary logistic regression.Results:Trust in science and key scientific institutions remained consistently high throughout this period. In the early pandemic, trust in the ministry declined. The most significant explanatory factors for trust in THL and the ministry were being a supporter of some other party than the right-wing Finns Party and belonging to the age groups over 50 years.Conclusions:Our findings indicate that the pandemic, marked by unpredictability, did not weaken trust in science and THL, whereas trust in the ministry responsible for managing the pandemic and university experts weakened. In increasingly politically polarised societies, the impact of political sentiments on health-related perceptions and choices should be analysed more in future public health studies.

public, environmental & occupational health
COVID-19, Diffuse Anxiety, and Public (Mis)Trust in Government: Empirical Insights and Implications for Crime and Justice

Jonathan C. Reid,Samantha J. Brown,Jared Dmello

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07340168231190673

2023-07-29

Criminal Justice Review

Abstract:Criminal Justice Review, Ahead of Print. Given that trust in government is a critical feature of a well-functioning democracy, research into its determinants has long been a priority among public opinion scholars. The consensus in the literature is that short-term factors drive the ebbs and flows of public trust, and a climate of mistrust has significant consequences on the government's ability to deliver on policies and enforce the law. Despite decades of extensive research on public trust, changing circumstances related to the COVID-19 pandemic support the need to investigate the factors shaping trust in this distinct period. This article, using data from the American National Election Study, explores how economic, social, and political anxieties pervasive throughout the pandemic influence trust in the United States government. Findings from ordered logistic regression analyses indicate that public trust in government is associated with views of the government's COVID-19 response, beliefs about the state of the country and government corruption, economic anxieties, and concerns about election fraud and the status of American democracy. Findings also reveal that sentiments toward institutions—including the police and the Center for Disease Control—contribute to variability in public trust. The implications of these findings for criminal justice research and policy are also considered.
The enduring effect of scientific interest on trust in climate scientists in the United States

Matthew Motta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0126-9

IF: 30.7

2018-04-23

Nature Climate Change

Abstract:People who distrust scientists are more likely to reject scientific consensus, and are more likely to support politicians who are sceptical of scientific research1. Consequently, boosting Americans’ trust in scientists is a central goal of science communication2. However, while previous research has identified several correlates of distrust in climate scientists3 and scientists more broadly4, far less is known about potential long-term influences taking root in young adulthood. This omission is notable, as previous research suggests that attitudes towards science formulated in pre-teenage years play a key role in shaping attitudes in adulthood5. Using data from the Longitudinal Study of American Youth, I find that interest in science at age 12–14 years is associated with increased trust in climate scientists in adulthood (mid thirties), irrespective of Americans’ political ideology. The enduring and bipartisan effects of scientific interest at young ages suggest a potential direction for future efforts to boost mass trust in climate scientists.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,meteorology & atmospheric sciences
How COVID-19 illness perceptions and individual shocks are associated with trust during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia, France, Germany, and South Africa

Marie-Hélène Broihanne,Daria Plotkina,Stefanie Kleimeier,Anja S Göritz,Arvid O I Hoffmann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105178

IF: 3.255

2024-09-30

Health Policy

Abstract:The COVID-19 pandemic jeopardized individuals' health and economic stability, and the associated shocks might have decreased individuals' trust. In this paper, we study the relationship between subjective perceptions of the pandemic and individuals' institutional and interpersonal trust (e.g., trust towards the government or health representatives), while considering objective health and economic shocks due to the pandemic as drivers. We collected data across Australia, France, Germany, and South Africa during a later stage of the COVID-19 pandemic (i.e., from mid-April to early-June 2021) when individuals had time to personally experience the pandemic and its effects. COVID-19 illness perception was associated with lower institutional and interpersonal trust. The health shock of having experienced COVID-19 was associated with higher interpersonal trust, while economic shocks were associated with lower institutional trust when they were due to the pandemic. The results suggest that public policy interventions in a later stage of a pandemic should consider objective economic and health outcomes as well as subjective ones, such as individual's perceptions. Authorities should communicate in a way that helps concerned people understand that they can take control of their health and the possibility of infection, and reassure them that health measures such as vaccination can help prevent the spread of the virus.
Trust in Government Actions During the COVID-19 Crisis

Marc Oliver Rieger,Mei Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02772-x

2021-08-24

Social Indicators Research

Abstract:Abstract The worldwide COVID-19 pandemic puts countries and their governments in an unprecedented situation. Strong countermeasures have been implemented in most places, but how much do people trust their governments in handling this crisis? Using data from a worldwide survey, conducted between March 20th and April 22nd, 2020, with more than 100,000 participants, we study people’s perceptions of government reactions in 57 countries. We find that media freedom reduces government trust directly as well as indirectly via a more negative assessment of government reactions as either insufficient or too strict. Higher level of education is associated with higher government trust and lower tendency to judge government reactions as too extreme. We also find different predictors of perceived insufficient reactions vs. too-extreme reactions. In particular, number of COVID-19 deaths significantly predicts perceived insufficient reactions but is not related to perceived too-extreme reactions. Further survey evidence suggests that conspiracy theory believers tend to perceive government countermeasures as too strict.

sociology,social sciences, interdisciplinary
The channels underlying the effect of COVID-19 on trust in physicians

Guangyi Xin,Yao Yao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2024.2349770

2024-05-05

Applied Economics Letters

Abstract:We use a nationally representative panel to examine the channels through which the COVID-19 pandemic induced higher trust in physicians in China. We find that respondents who closely followed news services, in which the contribution made by medical professionals was extensively praised, were more likely to express higher trust in physicians. These respondents also expressed significantly lower trust in American people, reflecting criticism in the Chinese media of the handling of the pandemic in the United States, lending further support to the public opinion guidance channel. We also find that respondents who had more contact with physicians prior to COVID-19 were less influenced by good news stories about the heroics of doctors in the pandemic.

economics
‘Rally round the flag’: the COVID-19 crisis and trust in the national government

Sylvia Kritzinger,Martial Foucault,Romain Lachat,Julia Partheymüller,Carolina Plescia,Sylvain Brouard

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1925017

2021-06-14

West European Politics

Abstract:<span>During international crises, trust in government is expected to increase irrespective of the wisdom of the policies it pursues. This has been called a 'rally-round-the-flag' effect. This article examines whether the COVID-19 crisis has resulted in such a rally effect. Using multi-wave panel surveys conducted in Austria and France starting from March 2020, in the article it is examined how government trust was affected by the perceived threats to the nation's health and economy created by the pandemic as well as by the perceived appropriateness of the government's crisis response. A strong rally effect is shown in Austria, where trust was closely tied to perceived health risks, but faded away quickly over time. Perceptions of government measures mattered, too, while perceived economic threat only played a minor role. In France, in contrast, a strong partisan divide is found and no rally effect.Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1925017 .</span>

political science

US trust in scientists plunged during the pandemic — but it's starting to recover

Largest post-pandemic survey finds trust in scientists is high

Government Trust in a Time of Crisis: Survey Evidence at the Beginning of the Pandemic in China

Trust in Physicians and Hospitals During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a 50-State Survey of US Adults

Interpersonal Risk Communication Matters More Than Media Risk Communication in Its Impact on Individuals' Trust and Preventive Behaviors During COVID-19.

Daily briefing: Global trust in scientists is high

Exploring the Role of Trust in Scientists to Explain Health-Related Behaviors in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic

Social and political trust diverge during a crisis

Trust in government increased during the Covid‐19 pandemic in Australia and New Zealand

Earning respect and trust

Trust in science and scientists among university students, staff, and faculty of a large, diverse university in Los Angeles during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Trojan Pandemic Response Initiative

Public understanding of science: Communicating in the midst of a pandemic

Trust in scientific information mediates associations between conservatism and coronavirus responses in the U.S., but few other nations

Government Response Measures and Public Trust during the COVID‐19 Pandemic: Evidence from Around the World

Trust in scientific institutions and experts during the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic in Finland

COVID-19, Diffuse Anxiety, and Public (Mis)Trust in Government: Empirical Insights and Implications for Crime and Justice

The enduring effect of scientific interest on trust in climate scientists in the United States

How COVID-19 illness perceptions and individual shocks are associated with trust during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia, France, Germany, and South Africa

Trust in Government Actions During the COVID-19 Crisis

The channels underlying the effect of COVID-19 on trust in physicians

‘Rally round the flag’: the COVID-19 crisis and trust in the national government