Noninvasive Differentiation of Obstructive Azoospermia and Nonobstructive Azoospermia Using Multimodel Diffusion Weighted Imaging

Wei Cai,Xiangde Min,Dong Chen,Chanyuan Fan,Zhaoyan Feng,Basen Li,Peipei Zhang,Huijuan You,Jinke Xie,Jihong Liu,Liang Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.05.039
IF: 5.482
2021-10-01
Academic Radiology
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Rationale and Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate the diagnostic performance of parameters derived from multimodel diffusion weighted imaging (monoexponential, stretched-exponential diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging [DKI]) from noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging in distinguishing obstructive azoospermia (OA) from nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Materials and Methods</h3><p>Forty-six patients with azoospermia were prospectively enrolled and classified into two groups (21 OA patients and 25 NOA patients). The multimodel parameters of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI; apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC], distributed diffusion coefficient [DDC], diffusion heterogeneity [α], diffusion kurtosis diffusivity [D<sub>app</sub>], and diffusion kurtosis coefficient [K<sub>app</sub>]) were derived. The diagnostic performance of these parameters for the differentiation of OA and NOA patients were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of each parameter.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>All the parameters (ADC, α, DDC, D<sub>app</sub><sub>,</sub> and K<sub>app</sub>) values were significantly different between OA and NOA (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001 for all). For the differentiation of OA from NOA, K<sub>app</sub> showed the highest AUC value (0.965), followed by DDC (0.946), D<sub>app</sub> (0.933), ADC (0.922), and α (0.887). K<sub>app</sub> had a significantly higher AUC than the conventional ADC (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3><p>Parameters derived from multimodels of DWI have the potential for the noninvasive differentiation of OA and NOA. The K<sub>app</sub> value derived from the DKI model might serve as a useful imaging marker for the differentiation of azoospermia.</p>
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?