Abstract:Objective To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of MRI diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and quantitative dynamic contrast enhancement MRI (DCE-MRI) in benign and malignant breast lesions, and to explore the differential diagnosis ability for different pathological types and molecular subtype lesions. Methods Sixty four females were retrospectively enrolled in the study of MRI diffusion kurtosis imaging and quantitative dynamic contrast enhancement between November 20 and May 2017. All of them were confirmed to have benign or malignant lesions after surgical resection or puncture. All patients underwent axial T1WI, DKI and DCE-MRI examinations. The mean kurtosis (MK) and mean diffusivity (MD) values were calculated by the DKI model, and the hemodynamic parameters were obtained by quantitative dynamic contrast enhancement, including volume transfer constant (Ktrans), rate constant (Kep), extravascular extracellular space distribute volume per unit tissue volume (Ve) and blood volume fraction (Vp). Pathological analysis was performed to monitor the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) and nuclear proliferation index Ki67. The breast cancer was divided into Luminal A type, Luminal B type, HER-2 positive and triple-negative 4 subtypes. The differences of DKI parameters and DCE-MRI parameters between benign and malignant breast lesions were compared using two independent samples t test (normal distribution and homogeneity of variance) or Mann-Whitney U test (skewed distribution or variance). ROC analysis was used to evaluate the value of DKI and DCE-MRI parameters in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions with pathological results as the gold standard. The Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis H test were used to compare the differences of DKI and DCE-MRI parameters among different prognostic factors and molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Spearman rank correlation analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between DKI and DCE-MRI parameters and different prognostic factors. Results Sixty-four cases were single lesions, with breast cancer in 23 cases and 41 cases of benign lesions. In breast cancer, there were 9 cases of Luminal A type, 7 cases of Luminal B type, 3 cases of HER-2 positive type and 4 cases of triple negative type. The positive numbers of ER, PR and HER-2 were 14, 11 and 10 cases respectively. Nineteen cases showed high expression of Ki67, while 4 cases showed low expression. There were significant differences in MK, MD, Ktrans and Kep between benign and malignant lesions (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between Ve and Vp (P>0.05). The area under the ROC for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions were 0.897, 0.808, 0.844 and 0.842, respectively. The combined multi-parameter differential diagnosis improved the efficacy. Combined with the above four parameters, the area under the ROC was 0.950. The diagnosis Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 0.870, 0.951 and 0.922 respectively. The Ktrans and Vp values of patients with ER positive and ER negative, as well as Ve value of deferent lymph node status, were significantly different (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the other prognostic factors (P>0.05). There was a moderate positive correlation between ER and Ktrans and Vp values. There was a low positive correlation between lymph node status and Ve value (r= 0.6, 0.5 and 0.4, respectively, P<0.05). No correlation was found among other parameters and prognostic factors (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in DKI and DCE-MRI parameters among different subtypes of breast cancer patients (all P>0.05). Conclusion DKI combined with DCE-MRI can improve the differential diagnosis of breast lesions and some DCE-MRI parameters are related to prognostic factors.

Preliminary Study of Monoexponential, Biexponential, and Stretched-Exponential Models of Diffusion-Weighted MRI and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging on Differential Diagnosis of Spinal Metastases and Chordoma

Application of Monoexponential, Biexponential, and Stretched-Exponential Models of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis of Metastases and Myeloma in the Spine-Univariate and Multivariate Analysis of Related Parameters.

Use of monoexponential diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced-MRI for the differentiation of spinal tumors

Differentiating between malignant and benign renal tumors: do IVIM and diffusion kurtosis imaging perform better than DWI?

The Value of Bi-Exponential and Non-Gaussian Distribution Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Differentiation of Recurrent Soft Tissue Neoplasms and Post-Surgical Changes

Comparative Study of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Model and Diffusion Weighted Imaging Model in Diagnosisofbreastcancer

Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion MRI for differentiating Benign and Malignant Nonfatty Musculoskeletal Soft Tissue Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Use of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging and Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for the Differentiation of Breast Tumors

Radiomics Analysis of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging: Distinguishing Between Glioblastoma and Single Brain Metastasis

Differentiation of Prostate Cancer and Stromal Hyperplasia in the Transition Zone with Monoexponential, Stretched-Exponential Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in a Reduced Number of B Values: Correlation with Whole-Mount Pathology

Differentiation of glioma and solitary brain metastasis: a multi-parameter magnetic resonance imaging study using histogram analysis

Grading Meningiomas Using Mono-Exponential, Bi-Exponential and Stretched Exponential Model-Based Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging

Comparison of Conventional DWI, Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging, and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Differentiating Lung Lesions

Diagnostic Value of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Combined with Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Breast Lesions

Comparison of stretched-exponential and monoexponential models of diffusion-weighted imaging between prostate cancer and normal tissues

Comparison of Stretched‐exponential and Monoexponential Model Diffusion‐weighted Imaging in Prostate Cancer and Normal Tissues

Differentiation between high-grade gliomas and solitary brain metastases based on multidiffusion MRI model quantitative analysis

Multiple exponential models of diffusion weighted imaging in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma from hepatic hemangioma

Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging versus Conventional Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Distinguishing Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Benign Hepatic Nodules

Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Mr Imaging In Breast Cancer: Quantitative Analysis For Characterizing Lesions

Application of advanced diffusion models from diffusion weighted imaging in a large cohort study of breast lesions