Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To explore the value of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and perfusion weighted imaging (PWI) in identifying benign and malignant renal masses and differentiating the histological types of renal masses. METHODS:Fifteen healthy volunteers and 46 patients with renal masses proven by pathology, including clear cell carcinomas (n = 18), papillary carcinomas (n = 8), chromophobe carcinomas (n = 7) and angiomyolipomas (n = 13), were examined with DWI and PWI scan at 3.0 T MRI. ANOVA was employed to compare the values of transfer constant (K(trans)), rate constant of backflux (Kep) and extra-vascular extra-cellular space fractional volume (Ve) proceeded by PWI and the value of ADC resulted from DWI between normal kidney and different histological types of renal masses. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to analyze and compare the diagnostic value of the methods of PWI and DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses. RESULTS:The ADC value of normal renal parenchyma was (2.10 ± 0.24) × 10⁻³ mm²/s, which was statistically higher than benign and malignant renal masses (P < 0.05). The ADC value of benign masses was statistically higher than that of all histological types of malignant masses (P < 0.05). Among three histological types of malignancies, clear cell carcinoma showed the statistically highest ADC value (P < 0.05). But the difference between papillary carcinoma and chromophobe carcinoma had no statistical significance (P > 0.05).Values of K(trans), Kep and Ve between normal renal parenchyma and different histological types of renal masses had statistical differences.Values of K(trans) and Ve in three histological types of malignant renal masses were statistically higher than those of benign renal masses.Kep value of clear cell carcinoma was significantly higher than that of benign renal masses (P < 0.05).However, other histological types of malignant masses had no significant difference with benign masses.For three malignant masses, K(trans) of clear cell carcinoma, papillary carcinoma and chromophobe carcinoma were (0.85 ± 0.27), (0.51 ± 0.04) and (0.39 ± 0.05)/min respectively. All values gradually reduced. And the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The Ve value of renal clear cell carcinoma was statistically higher than that of papillary carcinoma (P < 0.05). ROC curve was used to analyze and compare the diagnostic value of PWI versus DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses. The K(trans) of benign and malignant renal masses had the largest AUC (AUC = 0.937) at a threshold of 0.38/min. And there were a sensitivity of 87.9% and a specificity of 85.7%. The AUC of ADC was 0.823, sensitivity 72.7% and specificity 92.9%. The ADC threshold for differentiating benign from malignant masses was 1.40 × 10⁻³ mm²/s; AUC of Ve 0.803, sensitivity 78.8% and specificity 71.4%, a threshold of 0.29/min; Kep showed lower diagnostic value. CONCLUSION:3.0 T MRI DWI and PWI can effectively differentiate benign and different histological types of malignant renal masses. And PWI is superior to DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses.K(trans) with the largest AUC showed the highest diagnostic value. And ADC is also irreplaceable in providing the information of cellular structural features and the movement of water diffusion.

Non-invasive evaluation of the pathological and functional characteristics of chronic kidney disease by diffusion kurtosis imaging and intravoxel incoherent motion imaging: comparison with conventional DWI

Differentiating between malignant and benign renal tumors: do IVIM and diffusion kurtosis imaging perform better than DWI?

Diffusion-weighted Imaging in Assessing Renal Pathology of Chronic Kidney Disease: A Preliminary Clinical Study

Diffusion-weighted, intravoxel incoherent motion, and diffusion kurtosis tensor MR imaging in chronic kidney diseases: Correlations with histology

Pathological assessment of chronic kidney disease with DWI: Is there an added value for diffusion kurtosis imaging?

Primary Study of Chronic Kidney Disease with Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

Noninvasive assessment of clinical and pathological characteristics of patients with IgA nephropathy by diffusion kurtosis imaging

Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for the Assessment of Renal Fibrosis of Chronic Kidney Disease: A Preliminary Study.

Chronic Kidney Disease: Pathological and Functional Evaluation with Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion‐weighted Imaging

Diffusion kurtosis imaging for the assessment of renal fibrosis of chronic kidney disease: A preliminary study

Noninvasive assessment of kidney dysfunction in children by using blood oxygenation level-dependent MRI and intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging

Renal Functional and Interstitial Fibrotic Assessment with Non-Gaussian Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging

Diffusion kurtosis imaging as an imaging biomarker for predicting prognosis in chronic kidney disease patients

Diffusion kurtosis imaging and arterial spin labeling for the noninvasive evaluation of persistent post-contrast acute kidney injury

Diffusion-weighted imaging for staging chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis.

Preliminary study on intravoxel incoherent motion imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging based on magnetic resonance imaging of normal kidneys in children

Capability of Arterial Spin Labeling and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging to Detect Early Kidney Injury in Chronic Kidney Disease.

Based on functional and histopathological correlations: is diffusion kurtosis imaging valuable for noninvasive assessment of renal damage in early-stage of chronic kidney disease?

[Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Perfusion Weighted Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Renal Masses on 3.0 T MRI].

Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of kidneys in patients with chronic kidney disease: initial study

MR Diffusion-weighted Imaging in the Diagnosis of Chronic Kidney Disease