Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To explore the value of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and perfusion weighted imaging (PWI) in identifying benign and malignant renal masses and differentiating the histological types of renal masses. METHODS:Fifteen healthy volunteers and 46 patients with renal masses proven by pathology, including clear cell carcinomas (n = 18), papillary carcinomas (n = 8), chromophobe carcinomas (n = 7) and angiomyolipomas (n = 13), were examined with DWI and PWI scan at 3.0 T MRI. ANOVA was employed to compare the values of transfer constant (K(trans)), rate constant of backflux (Kep) and extra-vascular extra-cellular space fractional volume (Ve) proceeded by PWI and the value of ADC resulted from DWI between normal kidney and different histological types of renal masses. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to analyze and compare the diagnostic value of the methods of PWI and DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses. RESULTS:The ADC value of normal renal parenchyma was (2.10 ± 0.24) × 10⁻³ mm²/s, which was statistically higher than benign and malignant renal masses (P < 0.05). The ADC value of benign masses was statistically higher than that of all histological types of malignant masses (P < 0.05). Among three histological types of malignancies, clear cell carcinoma showed the statistically highest ADC value (P < 0.05). But the difference between papillary carcinoma and chromophobe carcinoma had no statistical significance (P > 0.05).Values of K(trans), Kep and Ve between normal renal parenchyma and different histological types of renal masses had statistical differences.Values of K(trans) and Ve in three histological types of malignant renal masses were statistically higher than those of benign renal masses.Kep value of clear cell carcinoma was significantly higher than that of benign renal masses (P < 0.05).However, other histological types of malignant masses had no significant difference with benign masses.For three malignant masses, K(trans) of clear cell carcinoma, papillary carcinoma and chromophobe carcinoma were (0.85 ± 0.27), (0.51 ± 0.04) and (0.39 ± 0.05)/min respectively. All values gradually reduced. And the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The Ve value of renal clear cell carcinoma was statistically higher than that of papillary carcinoma (P < 0.05). ROC curve was used to analyze and compare the diagnostic value of PWI versus DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses. The K(trans) of benign and malignant renal masses had the largest AUC (AUC = 0.937) at a threshold of 0.38/min. And there were a sensitivity of 87.9% and a specificity of 85.7%. The AUC of ADC was 0.823, sensitivity 72.7% and specificity 92.9%. The ADC threshold for differentiating benign from malignant masses was 1.40 × 10⁻³ mm²/s; AUC of Ve 0.803, sensitivity 78.8% and specificity 71.4%, a threshold of 0.29/min; Kep showed lower diagnostic value. CONCLUSION:3.0 T MRI DWI and PWI can effectively differentiate benign and different histological types of malignant renal masses. And PWI is superior to DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses.K(trans) with the largest AUC showed the highest diagnostic value. And ADC is also irreplaceable in providing the information of cellular structural features and the movement of water diffusion.

Comparison of Biexponential and Monoexponential Model of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Distinguishing Between Common Renal Cell Carcinoma and Fat Poor Angiomyolipoma

Differentiating between malignant and benign renal tumors: do IVIM and diffusion kurtosis imaging perform better than DWI?

Diffusion kurtosis versus diffusion-weighted MRI in differentiating clear cell renal cell carcinoma and renal angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: a comparative study

Comparison of Monoexponential, Biexponential, Stretched-Exponential, and Kurtosis Models of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Differentiation of Renal Solid Masses.

MRI-Based Radiomics and Urine Creatinine for the Differentiation of Renal Angiomyolipoma With Minimal Fat From Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Preliminary Study

Comparative Study of Conventional Diffusion- Weighted Imaging and Introvoxel Incoherent Motion in Assessment of Pathological Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Whole-Tumor Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram and Texture Analysis to Differentiation of Minimal Fat Angiomyolipoma from Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Comparison of conventional diffusion-weighted imaging and intravoxel incoherent motion in differentiating between chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and renal oncocytoma: a preliminary study

[Application of Diffusion-Weighted Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging in Diagnosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes].

Diagnostic Utility of Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Differentiating Small Solid Renal Tumors (≤4 Cm) at 3.0T Magnetic Resonance Imaging

[Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Perfusion Weighted Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Renal Masses on 3.0 T MRI].

Value of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion for Differential Diagnosis of Renal Tumors.

Comparison of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Mr Imaging with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Mri for Differentiating Lung Cancer from Benign Solitary Pulmonary Lesions

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram Analysis: Differentiation of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma from Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma with R-Field of View Diffusion Weighted Imaging

Comparison of Intra-voxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in the Evaluation of Focal Malignant Liver Masses

Differentiation of Pancreas Carcinoma from Healthy Pancreas Using Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging:Comparison of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion-Derived Parameters

Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI for the Differentiation of Benign, Intermediate, and Malignant Solid Soft‐tissue Tumors

Comparison of Biexponential and Monoexponential DWI in Evaluation of Fuhrman Grading of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in evaluation of breast lesions: Comparison with conventional DWI

Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Mr Imaging In Breast Cancer: Quantitative Analysis For Characterizing Lesions

Efficacy of 3D VIBE Dixon Fat Quantification for Differentiating Clear-Cell from Non-Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.